Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stelter Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$22kCrime & Legal$8kHousing & Shelter$7kInternational$4kPublic Benefit$3kEducation$3kHealth$2kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$110k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Christian Legal Aid$2,300
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Compassion International$1,084
EVICS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$579
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Hillsdale College$300
Christian Church of Estes Park$120
Turning Point USA$100
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $785) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Angelreach: $497 → 9%Angelreach: $288 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
OR
IA
IN
CA
CO
NE
VA
AZ
NM
AR
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$31k · 20 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
31

Total granted

$31k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+6%

Still filing today

45%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsReligionInternationalCrime & LegalHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Compassion International Incorporated
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +16%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN LEGAL AID
    4× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +416%
  • SF
    Students for Life of America Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $900 · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • P
    Politifact
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
2
Center of Theological Inquiry

The Center of Theological Inquiry is an independent research institution with an international visiting scholar program which convenes researchers in an ideal setting for interdisciplinary inquiries where theology casts light on global…

Religion
3
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
4
Reformation Bible College Inc

Reformation Bible College exists to provide a place for learning devoted to serving both laymen and pastors, offering both undergraduate and graduate degree programs based on Reformed Christian doctrine.

Education
5
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
6
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
7
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
8
Erskine College and Theological Seminary

Erskine College exists to glorify God as a Christian academic community where students are equipped to flourish as whole persons for lives of service through the pursuit of undergraduate liberal arts and graduate theological education.

Education
9
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
10
Risen Jesus Inc

Risen Jesus, Inc. provides religious education to college students and adults. This is accomplished via public lectures, debates and resources written and electronic on the ministry website www.risenjesus.com. Dr. Michael Licona is also a…

Religion
11
San Diego Christian College

San Diego Christian College exists to educate and inspire students through the truth of scripture and the development of competencies that prepare graduates whose purpose is to impact the world.

Education
12
Asbury College

Asbury university equips students, through academic excellence and spiritual vitality, for lifelong learning, leadership, and service to the professions, society, the family and the church, preparing them to engage their cultures and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Museum of the Bible. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF ESTES PARK: $5,283 · OtherCHRISTIAN CHURCH OF ESTES PARKIndividual grant recipient: $5,112 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,098 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $4,125 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $3,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,079 · OtherPolitifact: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,491 · Other+36 more: $14,473 · Other+36 moreCompassion International Incorporated: $4,231 · InternationalCOMMUNITY CHRISTIAN LEGAL AID: $4,086 · Crime & LegalRedeeming Justice Network: $1,121 · Civil RightsStudents for Life of America Inc: $900 · Civil RightsFAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC: $76 · Civil Rights+1 more: $50 · Civil RightsTHE EZRA PROJECT INC: $500 · ReligionRatio Christi Inc: $450 · ReligionChristianity Today International: $218 · ReligionREASONS TO BELIEVE: $150 · ReligionLeadership Institute: $950 · Public BenefitANGEL REACH: $785 · Human Services
Other$44,461International$4,231Crime & Legal$4,086Civil Rights$2,147Religion$1,318Public Benefit$950Human Services$785

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY CHRISTIAN LEGAL AID: $4,086 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetRedeeming Justice Network: $1,121 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLeadership Institute: $950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc: $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL REACH: $785 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EZRA PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRatio Christi Inc: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INC: $400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $365 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChristianity Today International: $218 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE BIBLE: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREASONS TO BELIEVE: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC: $76 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens United: $65 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArt Center of Estes Park: $50 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN LEGAL AID ↗
  • Who funds Redeeming Justice Network ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds Students for Life of America Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL REACH ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE EZRA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Ratio Christi Inc ↗
  • Who funds TWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO14.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stelter Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stelter Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stelter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph