Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stella P Holt Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2023
12
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$3k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Stella P Holt Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Stella P Holt Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $16k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’17
5
’18
8
’19
8
’20
7
’21
9
’22
7
’23
1
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$619kEducation$30kHealth$25kCivil Rights$23kEnvironment$15kArts & Culture$11kPublic Benefit$4kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0
02FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$164
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATURE CONSERVANCY$2,500
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION$2,000
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER$2,000
MASS EYE AND EAR INSTITUTE$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA JOURNALISM$1,500
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS$1,500
REPORTERS FOR FREEDOM PRESS$1,000
CM RUSSELL MUSEUM$1,000
FRIENDS OF THE IRISH STUDIES IN THE WEST$1,000
SWAN VALLEY CONNECTIONS$500
THE ESPLANADE ASSOCIATION$500
FRIENDS OF PUBLIC GARDEN$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $3k → 7%HARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $2k → 8%NATURE CONSERVANCY OF MONTANA: $2k → 9%SWAN VALLEY CONNECTIONS: $1k → 9%CM RUSSELL MUSEUM: $1k → 14%LITTLE BIG HORN COLLEGE: $1k → 23%FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION: $2k → 22%HARVARD VETERANS ALUMNI ORGANIZATION: $2k → 17%REPORTERS FOR FREEDOM PRESS: $1k → 14%HARVARD VETERANS ALUMNI ORGANIZATION: $2k → 9%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRANCH: $1k → 7%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3k → 8%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $2k → 7%BERMAN KLEIN CENTER: $2k → 8%NATURE CONSERVANCY OF MONTANA: $1k → 9%CM RUSSELL MUSEUM: $1k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION: $2k → 22%HARVARD VETERANS ALUMNI ORGANIZATION: $2k → 17%ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER: $2k → 14%HARVARD VETERANS ALUMNI ORGANIZATION: $1k → 9%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3k → 8%BERKMAN KLEIN CENTER FOR INTERNET & SOCIETY: $1k → 8%FRIENDS OF THE IRISH STUDIES IN THE WEST: $1k → 9%CM RUSSELL MUSEUM: $1k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION: $2k → 22%HARVARD VETERANS ALUMNI ORGANIZATION: $1k → 17%REPORTERS FOR FREEDOM PRESS: $1k → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2k → 8%BERKMAN KLEIN CENTER FOR INTERNET & SOCIETY: $1k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FRIENDS OF IRISH STUDIES: $1k → 9%CM RUSSELL MUSEUM: $1k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION: $2k → 22%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2k → 8%FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION: $2k → 22%FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION: $2k → 22%MCLAUGHLIN RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $3k → 14%MCLAUGHIN RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2k → 14%MASS EYE AND EAR: $4k → 16%MCLAUGHLIN RESEACH INSTITUTE: $2k → 14%MASS EYE AND EAR: $2k → 16%MCLAUGHLIN RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2k → 14%EPIC: $2k → 14%MASS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY: $2k → 16%EPIC: $2k → 14%MASS EYE AND EAR INSTITUTE: $2k → 16%ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER: $2k → 14%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $2k → 16%MASS EYE AND EAR INSTITUTE: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
MA
OH
PA
CO
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$94k · 23 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2023, 12 since wound down. Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
12

Total granted

$94k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+159%

Still filing today

52%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $12k · revenue +267%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    5× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +162%
  • EP
    ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER
    4× · 2018–2023 · $6k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • ME
    MASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • BK
    BERMAN KLEIN CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • HL
    HARVARD LAW SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
5
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
6
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
9
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
10
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
11
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
12
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Montana Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $617,503 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $11,500 · OtherTHE NATURE…HARVARD VETERANS ALUMNI ORGANIZATION: $6,500 · OtherHARVARD VE…MASS EYE AND EAR: $6,000 · OtherMASS EYE A…UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM: $4,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY…MCLAUGHLIN RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES INC: $4,500 · OtherMCLAUGHLIN…MASS EYE AND EAR INSTITUTE: $4,000 · OtherMASS EYE A…EPIC: $4,000 · OtherEPICREPORTERS FOR FREEDOM PRESS: $4,000 · OtherREPORTERS …UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $3,500 · Other+15 more: $20,500 · Other+15 moreFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $12,000 · Civil RightsELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER: $6,000 · Civil RightsCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsCOLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC: $4,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL: $2,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,000 · EducationHARVARD VARSITY CLUB INC: $1,500 · EducationDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $8,500 · HealthMASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY: $2,000 · HealthTRIGG - C M RUSSELL FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureESPLANADE ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureSWAN VALLEY CONNECTIONS: $1,500 · Environment
Community Improvement$617,503Other$69,000Civil Rights$23,000Education$12,500Health$10,500Arts & Culture$7,500Environment$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $617,503 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTRIGG - C M RUSSELL FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMCLAUGHLIN RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetESPLANADE ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSWAN VALLEY CONNECTIONS: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNational Smokejumper Association: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TRIGG - C M RUSSELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MCLAUGHLIN RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds ESPLANADE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SWAN VALLEY CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds HARVARD VARSITY CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds National Smokejumper Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stella P Holt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stella P Holt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stella P Holt Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stella P Holt Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stella P Holt’s filings →

More from the funding graph