· Private foundation
Stearns Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $78k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $318k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY | $55,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS RIVERS ALLIANCE | $40,000 |
| WOODMERE ART MUSEUM | $30,000 |
| STANFORD UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| WHEATON COLLEGE | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION (USCF FOUNDATION) | $20,000 |
| COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES | $17,500 |
| BRIC ARTS MEDIA BKLYN INC (DBA BRIC) | $15,000 |
| SAINT IGNATIUS SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| GRACE SCIENCE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION DBA MARINHEALTH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOGY CONSORTIUM FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| LOVE LIVES IN SEEKONK | $10,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC | $10,000 |
| MARIN COUNTY BICYCLE COALITION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $236k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
88 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 54 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MRMassachusetts Rivers Alliance Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $175k · revenue +76%
- WAWOODMERE ART MUSEUM8× · 2018–2025 · $162k · revenue +218%
- CFCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES9× · 2017–2025 · $153k · revenue +283%
Funded once
- OOORDER OF SISTERS OF OUR LADY OF SORROWSone grant, 2019 · $40k
- ACADM CAPITAL FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -49%
- WAWOODMERE ART MUSEUM PHIL PAone grant, 2017 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…
The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is Grace Science Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
107 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 107 of the 156 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Massachusetts Rivers Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds WOODMERE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds WHEATON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Seekonk Land Conservation Trust ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds CUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GRACE SCIENCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds SEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FARM FRESH RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds SAN DOMENICO SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WESTPORT LAND CONSERVATION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds WESTPORT RIVER WATERSHED ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BRIC ARTS MEDIA BKLYN INC ↗
- Who funds THE PACIFIC PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOG CONSORTIUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARIN PRIMARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds OLD SLATER MILL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · United Way of Rhode Island Inc · Marin Community Foundation · June Rockwell Levy Foundation Incorporated · Fidelity Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Amica Companies Foundation · Neil & Anna Rasmussen Foundation · Alvord Family Foundation · Pobble Stone Foundation · The Jaket Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stearns Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oars Inc — 100% of income from government
- Buzzards Bay Coalition — 37% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- Sea Education Association Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc — 11% of income from government
- Berkshire Immigrant Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- Communities for Restorative Justice Inc — 8% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Narrows Center for the Arts Inc — 5% of income from government
- Handel and Haydn Society — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Old Dartmouth Historical Society — 2% of income from government
- Neads Inc — 1% of income from government
- Concord Antiquarian Society D/B/a Concord Museum — 1% of income from government
- Massachusetts Rivers Alliance Inc — 1% of income from government
- Westport Historical Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Museum of Science — 0% of income from government
- Wheaton College — 0% of income from government
- Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.