Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stauber Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$415k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$526kHealth$458kAnimals$50kEnvironment$36kYouth Development$36kHousing & Shelter$18kArts & Culture$16kCommunity Improvement$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$718k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY SERVICES INC$250,000
SMILES INC$50,000
INSPIRATION MINISTRIES$50,000
MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY$30,000
MAYO CLINIC$10,000
WILD LIFE IN NEED CENTER$10,000
BELOIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE$2,500
MISERICORDIA$2,000
HAVEN$2,000
GANNON CENTER FOR WOMEN AND LEADERSHIP$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
OUR LADY OF TEPEYEC HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
WTTW$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $500 → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
CA
UT
AZ
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 21 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
26

Total granted

$1.0M
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+1%

Still filing today

48%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $518k · revenue +46%
  • CL
    CHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSPIRATION MINISTRIES
    4× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +64%
  • MH
    Maui Huliau Foundation
    6× · 2017–2022 · $36k · revenue +211%

Funded once

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • FS
    FOUR STAR FELLOWSHIP
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hawaiian Humane Society

The hawaiian humane society works to improve the welfare of animals through animal care, education, legislation, and prevention on the island of oahu. its mission is to promote the human-animal bond and the humane treatment of all animals.

Animals
2
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
3
Uhiwai O Haleakala

The mission of the corporation shall be to work with partners to protect and restore native ecosystems and watersheds, to improve the quality and quantity of freshwater resources to perpetuate hawaiian cultural resources and practices, to…

Environment
4
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
5
Humane Animal Welfare Society of Waukesha County Inc

The humane animal welfare society of waukesha county leads the community in animal welfare and assures sanctuary for animals in need.

Animals
6
Kahala Nui Senior Living Inc

In the spirit of "ohana", kahala nui senior living and its associates are dedicated to serving the unmet needs of seniors in hawaii. we are a not-for-profit organization that provides a continuum of high quality residential,…

Health
7
The Humane Society Wildlife Land Trust

The humane society wildlife land trust (hswlt) protects wildlife by preserving natural habitats and permanent sanctuaries.

Animals
8
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
9
Kahala Senior Living Community Inc

In the spirit of ohana, kahala senior living community and its associates are dedicated to serving the unmet needs of seniors in hawaii. we are a not-for-profit organization that provides a continuum of high quality residential and health…

Housing & Shelter
10
Honolulu Zoological Society

To inspire stewardship of our living world by providing meaningful conservation education and experiences to our community. the zoo emphasizes pacific tropical ecosystems and our values of malama (caring) and ho'okipa (hospitality).

Animals
11
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
12
Lihue Court Townhomes Corporation

The mission is to develop, own and manage multi-family rental communities serving families earning 20 to 80 percent of median income. the organization will assist its target families to become more self sufficient through the provision of…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Window to the World Communications Inc; the most unlike its peers is Maui Huliau Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC: $517,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesSMILES INC: $215,000 · OtherSMILES INCCHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSPIRATION MINISTRIES: $110,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA IN…Individual grant recipient: $22,797 · Other+37 more: $131,103 · Other+37 moreMAYO CLINIC: $131,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $30,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE IN NEED CENTER LTD: $20,000 · AnimalsMaui Huliau Foundation: $35,923 · EducationHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $2,000 · EducationLADDER UP (F/K/A CITY-WIDE TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM): $1,500 · Education+1 more: $300 · EducationSARAH'S CIRCLE: $17,500 · Housing & ShelterGIRL SCOUTS OF HAWAII: $5,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$518,500Other$478,900Health$131,000Animals$50,000Education$39,723Housing & Shelter$17,500Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC: $517,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $131,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSPIRATION MINISTRIES: $110,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMaui Huliau Foundation: $35,923 over 6y, 9.0% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWILDLIFE IN NEED CENTER LTD: $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSARAH'S CIRCLE: $17,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBELOIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $12,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF HAWAII: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WARMING HOUSE YOUTH CENTER: $3,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLADDER UP (F/K/A CITY-WIDE TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM): $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $1,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHALEAKALA WALDORF SCHOOL: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSPIRATION MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Maui Huliau Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE IN NEED CENTER LTD ↗
  • Who funds SARAH'S CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds BELOIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF HAWAII ↗
  • Who funds THE WARMING HOUSE YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE ↗
  • Who funds HADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds LADDER UP (F/K/A CITY-WIDE TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM) ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL13× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stauber Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stauber Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stauber Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph