Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stark Martin Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$119k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$330kEnvironment$151kFood & Nutrition$119kHousing & Shelter$104kArts & Culture$90kHealth$75kYouth Development$37kEducation$37k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $93k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILIES IN NATURE$20,000
GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF FREDERICKSBURG$20,000
CARITAS OF AUSTIN$15,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$15,000
HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL$13,000
ARIZONA FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOUNDATION$10,000
GIRLSTART$7,500
FREDERICKSBURG ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PHOENIX$5,000
BALLET AUSTIN$5,000
AUSTIN CLASSICAL GUITAR$2,000
AUSTIN MONTESSORI SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $119k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ARIZONA FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%ARIZONA FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%ARIZONA FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%ARIZONA FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%ARIZONA FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%ARIZONA FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%ARIZONA FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%ARIZONA FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PHOENIX: $5k → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PHOENIX: $5k → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PHOENIX: $5k → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PHOENIX: $5k → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PHOENIX: $5k → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PHOENIX: $5k → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PHOENIX: $5k → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PHOENIX: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$924k · 14 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$924k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+140%

Still filing today

93%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FI
    FAMILIES IN NATURE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $151k · revenue +211%
  • Central Texas Food Bank Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $119k · revenue +12%
  • CO
    CARITAS OF AUSTIN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $104k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • AT
    AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +140%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Austin Independent Journalism

To equip Austinites to make informed decisions through independent, in-depth reporting, diverse opinions, and civil dialogue. A strong local press is essential for a healthy community and democracy. We work to make Austin a more empowered…

Arts & Culture
2
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
3
Austin Creative Alliance

The mission of Austin Creative Alliance is to advance, connect, and celebrate Austin's arts, culture, and creative communities in order to nourish and strengthen the character, quality of life, and economic prosperity of our region.

Arts & Culture
4
Good Work Austin

Good Work Austin's mission is to foster healthy careers in the local food and beverage industry through professional development and advocacy for more equitable practices.

Public Benefit
5
Austin Public Library Friends Foundation

Support and strengthen austin public libraries

Education
6
Austin Classical School

Austin Classical School exists to glorify Jesus Christ by co-laboring with families to cultivate wise, virtuous, and humble students through an excellent classical, Christian education.

Education
7
Austin Home Base

To offer a community where students love learning, teachers love teaching, and families thrive.

Education
8
Atx Kids Club

ATX KIDS CLUB's mission is to empower youth through educational adventures that promote independence, confidence, and a deeper connection to their community - one field trip at a time.

Education
9
Austin Together Fund

Austin together enables sustained collaborations that strengthen the nonprofit community to create better outcomes for central texans through our unique grant and community engagement model.

Community Improvement
10
Film Society of Austin Inc
Arts & Culture
11
Austin Area Foundation

Support nonprofit organizations by managing & distributing charitable gifts

Philanthropy
12
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Austin Classical Guitar Society; the most unlike its peers is Families in Nature. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF FREDERICKSBURG: $109,250 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF FREDERICKSBURGCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $104,250 · OtherCARITAS OF AUSTINHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL: $86,500 · OtherHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCILCREATE HEALTHY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherCREATE HEALTHY FOUNDATIONGOOD SAMARITAN CENTER: $15,000 · Other+1 more: $9,000 · OtherFAMILIES IN NATURE: $151,100 · EnvironmentFAMILIES IN NATURECentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $119,250 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas …Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation: $79,500 · Human ServicesArizona Friend…Delivering Dreams of Arizona: $39,750 · Human ServicesDelivering Dre…HILL COUNTRY FILM SOCIETY INC: $62,000 · Arts & CultureHILL COUN…BALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED: $14,000 · Arts & CultureBALLET AU…AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $5,000 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN TH…GIRLSTART: $37,250 · Recreation & SportsFREDERICKSBURG ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $33,000 · EducationAUSTIN MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC: $4,000 · Education
Other$399,000Environment$151,100Food & Nutrition$119,250Human Services$119,250Arts & Culture$81,000Recreation & Sports$37,250Education$37,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILIES IN NATURE: $151,100 over 8y, 13% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $119,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $104,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL: $86,500 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetArizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation: $79,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCREATE HEALTHY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetHILL COUNTRY FILM SOCIETY INC: $62,000 over 7y, 25% of budgetDelivering Dreams of Arizona: $39,750 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetGIRLSTART: $37,250 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetBALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY: $9,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILIES IN NATURE ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CREATE HEALTHY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY FILM SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Delivering Dreams of Arizona ↗
  • Who funds GIRLSTART ↗
  • Who funds FREDERICKSBURG ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Better Business BureauTX15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Better Business Bureau · The Seawell Elam Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stark Martin Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stark Martin Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stark Martin Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Stark Martin Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stark Martin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph