Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stanley and Judith Frankel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$6.2MHealth$5.8MReligion$2.2MEducation$1.0MPhilanthropy$404kHuman Services$298kYouth Development$90kHousing & Shelter$54kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $146k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $568k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
$36,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$1,454,000
PROJECT LEGACY$100,000
BAIS BROCHO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$100,000
HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT$80,000
Individual grant recipient$72,000
Individual grant recipient$72,000
Individual grant recipient$72,000
KOLLEL BNAI YESHIVAH$72,000
TALMUDICAL YESHIVAH OF PHILADELPHIA$36,000
CHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF TROY$36,000
HEBREW BENEVOLENT SOCIETY$36,000
NEW MUSIC DETROIT$20,000
CONGRGATION BETH AHM$18,000
MISSION OAKLAND - POLICE WEEK$5,000
BONEI OLAM INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $330k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BONEI OLAM INC: $5k → 20%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%BONEI OLAM INC: $5k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $5k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $5k → 20%PROJECT LEGACY: $100k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $5k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $5k → 20%PROJECT LEGACY: $75k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $5k → 20%FOCUS HOPE: $5k → 21%DETROIT CHESED PROJECT: $25k → 8%DETROIT CHESED PROJECT: $25k → 8%DETROIT CHESED PROJECT: $20k → 8%DETROIT CHESED PROJECT: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
KS
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 24% of Stanley and Judith Frankel Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Stanley and Judith Frankel Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 36 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
28

Total granted

$16M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+8%

Still filing today

50%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $142k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationReligionArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    7× · 2017–2024 · $5.8M · revenue +202% · 60% of their budget
  • HD
    HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT
    6× · 2018–2025 · $455k · revenue +39%
  • DP
    DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA
    5× · 2017–2023 · $440k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • BB
    BAIS BROCHO D'STOLIN KARLIN
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • OU
    OAKLAND UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
3
United Jewish Foundation

The united jewish foundation of detroit owns, manages and invests jewish communal assets, including general and endowment funds, agency endowments, supporting foundations and real property. the foundation is committed to ensuring that…

Philanthropy
4
Keren L'torah

Keren l'torah will promote jewish education in the greater detroit jewish community through classes, lectures, and distribution of written and audio materials. all educational opportunities by the corporation will be either free or at a…

Religion
5
Jewish Historical Society of Michigan

Jewish historical society of michigan shares and celebrates the experiences and contributions of the jewish people, communities and institutions of michigan.

—
6
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
7
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
8
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
9
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
10
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
11
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
—
12
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Center of Metropolitan Detroit; the most unlike its peers is Yad Laniyim. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/33
Grantees still filing
22/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Michigan: $5,799,776 · OtherUniversity of MichiganTALMUDICAL YESHIVA OF PHILADELPHIA: $849,000 · OtherTALMUDICAL YESHIVA OF PHILADELPHIABAIS BROCHO D'STOLIN KARLIN: $500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $468,000 · Other+44 more: $2,125,318 · Other+44 moreDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $5,386,971 · Arts & CultureDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $440,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIATHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $240,000 · Arts & CultureHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT: $455,360 · EducationCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $225,000 · Education+2 more: $22,200 · EducationPROJECT LEGACY: $175,000 · Human ServicesDETROIT CHESED PROJECT: $90,000 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $35,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $20,000 · Human Services+2 more: $5,100 · Human ServicesJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $75,000 · ReligionLAHSER ROAD MIKVAH: $50,000 · ReligionAISH HATORAH DETROIT: $25,000 · ReligionTHE AFIKIM FOUNDATION: $5,250 · ReligionTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $28,000 · PhilanthropyYAD LANIYIM: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$9,742,094Arts & Culture$6,066,971Education$702,560Human Services$350,100Religion$155,250Youth Development$90,000Philanthropy$53,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $5,799,776 over 7y, 60% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $5,386,971 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT: $455,360 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $440,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $240,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $225,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT LEGACY: $175,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetDETROIT CHESED PROJECT: $90,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $90,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $28,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYAD LANIYIM: $25,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BEAR-HUG FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetBEYOND BASICS: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $7,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH DENTAL CLINIC: $6,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetTHE AFIKIM FOUNDATION: $5,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOCUSHOPE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYAD EZRA: $3,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN PSYCHOANALYTIC FOUNDATION INC: $800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT LEGACY ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT CHESED PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAHSER ROAD MIKVAH ↗
  • Who funds Met Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds AISH HATORAH DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Jewish FoundationMI32× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Jewish Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Jewish Federation of Detroit · Ahavas Avraham Foundation · The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation · The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · Woll-Yellin Family Foundation · The Samuel and Jean Frankel Jewish Heritage Foundation · Shari & Alon Friendship Foundation Inc · The Jerold and Ellen Minkin Family Foundation · Schostak Family Support Foundation · Pappas Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stanley and Judith Frankel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stanley and Judith Frankel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stanley and Judith Frankel Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stanley and Judith Frankel Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stanley and Judith Frankel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph