Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stampt Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$45kReligion$44kHuman Services$36kHealth$35kYouth Development$14kInternational$13kEmployment$11kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$360k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALESIANUM TRUST SAINT FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY$5,000
SALVATION ARMY WI AND UPPER MI$4,600
AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC$4,400
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
NOURISHING HOPE$3,000
ST BONIFACE CATHOLIC CHURCH$3,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES$3,000
ST FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY$2,000
EISENHOWER IKE CENTER$2,000
LAKE COUNTRY CLASSICAL ACADEMY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
SALVATION ARMY OF NORTH AND CENTRAL IL$1,500
INDEPENDENCE CENTER$1,500
BROOKFIELD ACADEMY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SAMARITANS: $3k → 16%CAMP MISHAWAKA: $5k → 14%LAKE COUNTRY CLASSICAL ACADEMY: $2k → 5%ST BONIFACE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 6%THE SALESIANUM TRUST SAINT FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY: $5k → 17%AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $2k → 13%NOURISHING HOPE: $3k → 14%PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $3k → 4%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $2k → 19%SAMARITANS: $3k → 16%LAKE COUNTRY CLASSICAL ACADEMY: $2k → 5%ST BONIFACE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 6%ST FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY: $2k → 17%AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 9%NOURISHING HOPE: $2k → 14%SAMARITANS: $2k → 16%LAKE COUNTRY CLASSICAL ACADEMY: $2k → 5%ST BONIFACE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 6%ST FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY: $2k → 17%AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 9%LAKE COUNTRY CLASSICAL ACADEMY: $2k → 5%ST BONIFACE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 6%ST FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY: $2k → 17%YEARS UP BOSTON: $2k → 16%ST BONIFACE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 6%ST FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY: $2k → 17%YEARS UP BOSTON: $2k → 16%ST FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY: $2k → 17%YEAR UP: $2k → 16%YEAR UP: $2k → 16%YEAR UP BOSTON: $2k → 16%YEAR UP BOSTON: $2k → 16%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 17%SALVATION ARMY WI AND UPPER MI: $5k → 17%SALVATION ARMY WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN: $4k → 17%SALVATION ARMY WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN: $3k → 17%SALVATION ARMY OF MILWAUKEE COUNTY: $3k → 17%SALVATION ARMY WI AND UPPER MI: $3k → 17%SALVATION ARMY WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
MA
IN
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$199k · 24 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against -28% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
6

Total granted

$199k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
-28%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $13k · revenue +35%
  • IC
    INDEPENDENCE CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +46%
  • YEAR UP INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $11k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • CM
    CAMP MISHAWAKA
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -28%
  • CR
    CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Big Brothers-Big Sisters of Metropolitan Chicago

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite and empower the promise of youth. we nurture children, strengthen communities and believe that inherent in every child is the ability to succeed and thrive in life.

—
2
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
3
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
4
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Triangle Inc

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth. the organization's vision is that all youth achieve their full potential.

Youth Development
5
Personal Counseling Services Inc

To provide mental health services to everyone desiring wellness of body, mind, spirit and community.

—
6
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
7
Lakeshore Community Services Inc

The mission of lakeshore is to enhance the ability of persons with mental and physical disabilities to live as independently as possible through acquisition of skills and utilization of services that promote each individual's self…

Human Services
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
10
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
11
Choices Coordinated Care Solutions Inc

To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.

Human Services
12
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters Southern Lake Michigan Region Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lake Country Classical Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $32,000 · OtherMARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLST BONIFACE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $18,250 · OtherST BONIFACE CATHOLIC CHURCHSAINT FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY: $14,200 · OtherSAINT FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARYINDEPENDENCE CENTER: $12,000 · OtherINDEPENDENCE CENTERSALVATION ARMY WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN: $9,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGANSALVATION ARMY WI AND UPPER MI: $7,600 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $7,200 · OtherNOURISHING HOPE: $6,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF MILWAUKEE COUNTY: $6,500 · Other+14 more: $40,250 · Other+14 moreYEAR UP INC: $11,000 · EducationYEAR UP IN…LAKE COUNTRY CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC: $9,250 · EducationLAKE COUNT…EISENHOWER CENTER INC: $9,500 · HealthEISENHOWER…SAMARITANS INC: $8,750 · HealthSAMARITANS…RACING FOR KIDS: $1,000 · HealthAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $12,800 · InternationalCAMP MISHAWAKA: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $4,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$153,500Education$20,250Health$19,250International$12,800Youth Development$5,000Crime & Legal$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $12,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENCE CENTER: $12,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEISENHOWER CENTER INC: $9,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE COUNTRY CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC: $9,250 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSAMARITANS INC: $8,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP MISHAWAKA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRACING FOR KIDS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SOUTHERN LAKE MICHIGAN REGION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
  • Who funds EISENHOWER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTRY CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITANS INC ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds CAMP MISHAWAKA ↗
  • Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds RACING FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SOUTHERN LAKE MICHIGAN REGION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stampt Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stampt Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Samaritans Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stampt Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Stampt Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stampt’s filings →

More from the funding graph