· Public charity
Staenberg Family Foundation
To be organized, and at all times hereafter, to be operated exclusively for the benefit of and to be operated, supervised and controlled by the jewish federation of st.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 26 grants below total $1,369,400 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,597,228 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $227,828 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $99k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $156k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $443k
- $250k+2 grants · $672k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Maryville University | $378,000 |
| Jewish Federation of St Louis | $293,600 |
| JEWISHColorado | $180,000 |
| Municipal Theater Association of St Louis (MUNY) | $120,000 |
| National Council of Jewish Women St Louis Section | $92,500 |
| Cancer Supports Community St Louis | $50,000 |
| Be the Narrative | $36,000 |
| Epstein Hebrew Academy | $27,000 |
| Friends of United Hatzalah | $27,000 |
| Ukrainian Patriot Inc | $18,000 |
| Esther Miller Bais Yaakov | $18,000 |
| Jazz St Louis | $10,000 |
| Central Reform Congregation | $10,000 |
| College Bound | $10,000 |
| Shalom Park | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
42 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $584k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC2× · 2017–2018 · $2.3M · revenue +51%- ESENTREPRENEUR STARTUP BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION2× · 2017–2018 · $285k · revenue +56%
- CSCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY OF GREATER ST LOUIS7× · 2018–2024 · $177k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER - DENVERone grant, 2018 · $1.6M
- CSCHURCHILL SCHOOL AND CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $200k · revenue +88%
- OUORTHODOX UNIONone grant, 2023 · $54k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
To sustain and enhance jewish life at home and around the world.
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.
Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…
See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…
To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.
To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…
As the central community relations agency of the organized jewish community in our nation's capital, the jcrc of greater washington endeavors to foster a society based on freedom, justice and democratic pluralism for it is such a society…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of St Louis and the most unlike its peers is Shaving Israel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Jewish Federation of St Louis ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS ↗
- Who funds Maryville University - St Louis ↗
- Who funds ENTREPRENEUR STARTUP BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISHColorado ↗
- Who funds CRAFT ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
- Who funds CHURCHILL SCHOOL AND CENTER ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN ST LOUIS SECTION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS JEWISH LIGHT ↗
- Who funds CANDID ↗
- Who funds A MILLION STARS INC DBA COLLEGE BOUND ↗
- Who funds Be The Narrative formerly Student to Student Inc ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL BUSINESS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds JAZZ ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds SAUL MIROWITZ JEWISH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds B'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
- Who funds THE ST LOUIS MEN'S GROUP AGAINST CANCER ↗
- Who funds ESTHER MILLER BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds CONCORDANCE ↗
- Who funds VARIETY THE CHILDRENS CHARITY OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY TO HOPE ↗
- Who funds MOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAT KADIMAH HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds VENTURE FOR AMERICA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of St Louis · St Louis Community Foundation · Millstone Foundation · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Washington University · Edward Jones Foundation · Centene Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · The Kranzberg Family Charitable Foundation · Trio Foundation of St Louis
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Staenberg Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Staenberg Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Staenberg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.