Loading…
· Public charity
ST PETERS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
Charitable foundation providing funds to institutions and individuals for relief of sick and destitue persons, orphans, and other persons needing assistance per the boards judgement.
$122k
Granted FY2024
4
Grants
1
Communities
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Health$322kHousing & Shelter$225kHuman Services$184kPhilanthropy$35kEducation$20kOther$55k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
feed indigent
2019
feed indigent
2020
—
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
- SAMARITAN HOUSE INC$30,000
- CARE RING INC$25,000
- CHARLOTTE COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC$15,000
- SUPPORTIVE HOUSING COMMUNITIES INC$12,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $184k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$841k · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else
13 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
13
0
Total granted
$841k
$0
Still filing today
77%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSAMARITAN HOUSE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $225k · revenue +62%
- CRCARE RING INC8× · 2017–2024 · $148k · revenue +117%
- SHSUPPORTIVE HOUSING COMMUNITIES INC6× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +23%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
One Charlotte Health Alliance Llc
The ONE Charlotte Health Alliance Mission is to convene and align partnerships to improve health in under served communities
—
2
Community Free Clinic Inc
The mission of the Clinic is to help adults move toward wellness by providing healthcare and pharmacy services. The Clinic accomplishes its mission by removing the barriers of limited financial resources and lack of health insurance.…
Health
3
Charlotte Medical Dental and Pharmaceutical Association
Health
4
North Carolina Community Health Center Assoc Inc
To promote community based primary health care systems in medically underserved areas.
Health
5
First Choice Community Health Ctrs
Providing healthcare to the underserved population of Harnett County NC and the surrounding area.
Health
6
Cook Community Clinic Inc
To create a medical home for uninsured families and individuals in the communities that we serve.
Health
7
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found
Health
8
Samaritan Health Center Inc
To provide high quality health care services to uninsured and underserved patients in Durham, NC and surrounding areas.
Health
9
Neighborhood Healthcare
Neighborhood Healthcare is committed to providing quality health care and promoting wellness to everyone in our communities, focusing on those most in need.
—
10
WakeMed
The mission of wakemed is to improve the health and well-being of our community with outstanding and compassionate care to all.
Health
11
Community Health Connect
To improve access to quality health and dental care for low-income uninsured men, women, and children in Utah County.
—
12
Wnc Health Network Inc
WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Supportive Housing Communities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nourish Up. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$322,000Housing & Shelter$225,000Human Services$184,000Other$55,000Philanthropy$35,000Education$20,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAMARITAN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CARE RING INC ↗
- Who funds SUPPORTIVE HOUSING COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds MATTHEWS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds NC MED ASSIST ↗
- Who funds CAMINO HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds LOAVS & FISHES ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP TRAYS ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE REGIONAL DENTAL HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS ASSISTANCE MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds TEEN HEALTH CONNECTION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Foundation for the CarolinasNC23.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Healthy Charlotte Alliance Inc · The Presbyterian Hospital · The Leon Levine Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Philip L Van Every Foundation · Presbyterian Hospital Foundation · Merancas Foundation Inc · Americares Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ST PETERS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CHARLOTTE REGIONAL DENTAL HEALTH CLINIC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
high risk
2 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.
Legal standing
medium risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 561707376 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CHARLOTTE REGIONAL DENTAL HEALTH CLINIC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 36% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to St Peters Hospital Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to St Peters Hospital Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines