Skip to content

· Public charity

St Joseph Regional Health Network

The mission of st.

$217k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$108k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$233MCrime & Legal$314kHuman Services$32kReligion$25kEducation$23kCommunity Improvement$10kArts & Culture$10kPhilanthropy$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $148,523, the rows itemized in this filing. The $216,678 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $68,155 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $108k
$13,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$152M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bern Township Police$107,823
Breast Cancer Support Services$15,000
Diocese of Allentown$13,500
Alvernia University$6,700
Adalyn Rose Foundation$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ADALYN ROSE FOUNDATION: $9k → 11%Adalyn Rose Foundation: $6k → 11%SAFE BERKS: $10k → 11%CLARE OF ASSISI HOUSE INC: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$234M · 7 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$234M
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-4%

Still filing today

71%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH MEDICAL GROUP
    7× · 2017–2023 · $230M · revenue -30% · 59% of their budget
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2023 · $2.7M · revenue -91% · 43% of their budget
  • BT
    Bern Township Police
    3× · 2022–2025 · $314k

Funded once

  • HM
    HOPE MINISTRIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR THE READING PUBLIC MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -11%
  • SB
    SAFE BERKS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
2
Reading Berks Association of Realtors Inc

The reading berks association of realtors promotes a high standard of professionalism, advocates for private property rights, and strives to improve the quality of life in our communities.

—
3
Bon Secours - St Francis Health System Foundation Inc

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good help to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

—
4
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
5
Bon Secours - Richmond Health System Inc

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

Health
6
Bradford Regional Medical Services

Multi-specialty physician group practice organized to serve patients in bradford, pa, and the surrounding area.

Health
7
Berks Community Health Center

Berks community health center provides exceptional family-centered primary and preventive healthcare for all residents of berks county, regardless of economic status.

Health
8
North Adams Regional Hospital

The mission of north adams regional hospital is to advance health & wellness for everyone in our community in a welcoming, inclusive, & personalized environment.

Health
9
Penn State Health Holy Spirit Medical Center

The mission of penn state health holy spirit medical center is to nurture the healing ministry of the church, supported by education and research. fidelity to the gospel urges us to emphasize human dignity and social justice as we create…

Health
10
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
11
Connections Work

Connections work changes lives and improves communities by providing services and supports to individuals seeking pathways to success.

—
12
Bon Secours Richmond Healthcare Foundation

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good help to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Joseph Medical Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Sisters of St Francis of Philadelphia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
2/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOSEPH MEDICAL GROUP: $230,427,934 · HealthST JOSEPH MEDICAL GROUP+2 more: $32,000 · HealthST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,721,441 · OtherBern Township Police: $313,638 · Other+4 more: $57,800 · OtherADALYN ROSE FOUNDATION: $14,000 · Human ServicesSAFE BERKS: $10,000 · Human ServicesCLARE OF ASSISI HOUSE INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR THE READING PUBLIC MUSEUM: $10,000 · Arts & CultureBERKS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · PhilanthropyOLIVET BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF READING AND BERKS COUNTY PA: $7,500 · Youth Development
Health$230,459,934Other$3,092,879Human Services$32,000Arts & Culture$10,000Philanthropy$8,000Youth Development$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOSEPH MEDICAL GROUP: $230,427,934 over 7y, 59% of budgetST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,721,441 over 6y, 43% of budgetALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $23,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CANCER SUPPORT SERVICES OF BERKS COUNTY: $22,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetADALYN ROSE FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE READING PUBLIC MUSEUM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAFE BERKS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERKS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLARE OF ASSISI HOUSE INC: $8,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetOLIVET BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF READING AND BERKS COUNTY PA: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Breidegam Family FoundationPA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Breidegam Family Foundation · Berks County Community Foundation Inc · The Wyomissing Foundation Inc · Penn Entertainment Foundation · The Cynthia and Jim Boscov Family Foundation · Henry Janssen Foundation · United Way of Berks County Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Joseph Regional Health Network funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Joseph Regional Health Network. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Joseph Regional Health Network’s filings →

    More from the funding graph