Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Cynthia and Jim Boscov Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0175% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20212025.

Education$205kPhilanthropy$84kHuman Services$14kHousing & Shelter$12kHealth$6kYouth Development$5kEnvironment$3kArts & Culture$2kOther$108k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF BERKS COUNTY$20,000
ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY$12,500
HOSTS FOR HOSPITALS$10,000
HELPING HARVEST FRESH FOOD BANK$5,000
SPOTLIGHT PA$5,000
CARON TREATMENT CENTERS$5,000
RICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION$5,000
OLIVET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF READING AND BERKS COUNTY PA$5,000
GOGGLE WORKS$1,000
SAFE BERKS$1,000
READING SCIENCE CENTER$1,000
READING HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF READING PA$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SOUTH MOUNTAIN YMCA: $7k → 9%SAFE BERKS: $5k → 11%SAFE BERKS: $1k → 11%SAFE BERKS: $500 → 11%SAFE BERKS: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$188k · 6 repeat orgs$233k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$188k
$210k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+4%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF BERKS COUNTY INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $75k · revenue +10%
  • AU
    ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +27%
  • HF
    Hosts for Hospitals
    3× · 2023–2025 · $12k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +4%
  • SM
    SOUTH MOUNTAIN YMCA
    one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue 0%
  • SR
    SCHUYLKILL RIVER GREENWAY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Reading Hospital

Website: www.towerhealth.org/locations/reading-hospital the mission of reading hospital is to provide compassionate, accessible, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare to the community; to promote health; to education healthcare…

Health
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
Reading Berks Association of Realtors Inc

The reading berks association of realtors promotes a high standard of professionalism, advocates for private property rights, and strives to improve the quality of life in our communities.

4
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
5
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

6
Holy Redeemer Health System

As a catholic health system, rooted in the tradition of the sisters of the holy redeemer, we care, comfort and heal, following the example of jesus, proclaiming the hope god offers in the midst of human struggle.

Health
7
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
8
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
9
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
10
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
11
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
12
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helping Harvest Fresh Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Hosts for Hospitals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $200,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY+1 more — $5,000 · EducationALVERNIA UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · OtherALVERNIA UNIVERSITYCARON TREATMENT CENTERS — $25,000 · OtherCARON TREATMENT CENTERSPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $18,750 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODJEWISH FEDERATION OF READING PA INC — $9,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF READING …HELPING HARVEST FRESH FOOD BANK — $5,000 · Other+4 more — $4,600 · OtherUNITED WAY OF BERKS COUNTY INC — $75,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF BERKS C…BERKS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 · PhilanthropyBERKS COUNTY COMMUNIT…SAFE BERKS — $7,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH MOUNTAIN YMCA — $7,000 · Human ServicesHosts for Hospitals — $12,000 · Housing & ShelterRICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthREADING HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 · HealthOLIVET BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF READING AND BERKS COUNTY PA — $5,000 · Youth Development
Education$205,000Other$112,350Philanthropy$84,000Human Services$14,000Housing & Shelter$12,000Health$6,000Youth Development$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BERKS COUNTY INC — $75,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetALVERNIA UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHosts for Hospitals — $12,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetBERKS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF READING PA INC — $9,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSAFE BERKS — $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH MOUNTAIN YMCA — $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHELPING HARVEST FRESH FOOD BANK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHUYLKILL RIVER GREENWAY ASSOCIATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREADING HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOGGLE WORKS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHYY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Breidegam Family FoundationPA30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Breidegam Family Foundation · Berks County Community Foundation Inc · Penn Entertainment Foundation · Henry Janssen Foundation · Hammel Family Foundation · The Wyomissing Foundation Inc · Firstenergy Foundation · Berkshire Charitable Foundation · Marlin Miller Jr Family Foundation · United Way of Berks County Inc · The Kindness Coalition · Pf Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Cynthia and Jim Boscov Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Cynthia and Jim Boscov Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Cynthia and Jim Boscov Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph