Skip to content
St John Health System Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

St John Health System Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable.

$435k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$4.7MEducation$1.0MArts & Culture$662kHuman Services$658kPhilanthropy$485kCommunity Improvement$475kFood & Nutrition$234kHousing & Shelter$219kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 21 grants below total $370,582, the rows itemized in this filing. The $435,036 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $64,454 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $222k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$11,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULSAS FUTURE INC$110,000
ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER INC$42,101
TRAUMA FELLOWSHIP OF OKLAHOMA INC$20,000
NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE INC$15,000
SAMARITAN COUNSELING & GROWTH CENTER INC$15,000
TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$14,990
OKLAHOMANS FOR EQUALITY INC$14,500
CARABELLES LEGACY INC$14,250
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF TULSA$13,150
NOWATA CAN$12,500
CARING COMMUNITY FRIENDS INC$11,000
YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC$10,000
STAND 4 JUSTICE MOVEMENT$10,000
CASCIA HALL SCHOOL CORPORATION$10,000
SUSTAINABLE TULSA INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $319k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAMARITAN COUNSELING & GROWTH CENTER INC: $15k → 14%HOPE CLINIC: $10k → 14%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE INC: $15k → 14%DAY SPRING VILLA WOMEN AND CHILDRENS SHELTER INC: $8k → 15%YWCA TULSA: $8k → 15%THE SPRING SHELTER INC: $8k → 15%THE HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF TULSA INC: $8k → 15%THE SPRING SHELTER INC: $8k → 15%THE HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF TULSA INC: $8k → 15%YWCA TULSA: $8k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $10k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $8k → 15%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $8k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES INC: $8k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SVS INC: $8k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $7k → 15%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $55k → 15%COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT OF TULSA COUNTY INC: $100k → 15%COMM ACTION PROJECT OF TULSA COUNTY INC: $9k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES INC: $6k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
MA
OH
MO
VA
AZ
OK
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.7M · 42 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
35

Total granted

$6.7M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

83%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $137k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR TULSAS FUTURE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $435k · revenue +6%
  • MH
    Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma
    8× · 2017–2025 · $204k · revenue +177%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $146k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $615k · revenue -126%
  • AS
    ALL SAINTS HOME MEDICAL LLC
    one grant, 2018 · $235k · revenue -9%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR HOUSING SOLUTIONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $185k · revenue +115%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crossover Health Services Inc

Crossover health services (chs) envisions a christian healthcare movement where faith, strong relationships, and shared resources drive community restoration and eliminate health disparities. we believe that healthcare is a right, not a…

Health
2
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
3
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
4
Saint Francis Hospital Inc

To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

Health
5
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
6
Indian Health Care Resource Center Inc

To empower the american indian through exceptional healthcare.

Health
7
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
8
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
9
Tulsa County Medical Society Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to develop, create, and maintain programs in the tulsa area designed for health promotion, health education, and disease prevention and treatment through the professional expertise and engagement of the…

Philanthropy
10
Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma

The mission of the Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma is exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes. The activities of the Corporation may include: (A) Promoting the good health and welfare (continued on Schedule O)

Health
11
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
12
Oklahoma State Medical Association

Osma's vision is to be the leading voice in health care for oklahoma's patients, families and physicians. osma's mission is better health for oklahoma.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
74/75
Grantees still filing
40/75
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $3,355,326 · HealthST JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INCALL SAINTS HOME MEDICAL LLC: $235,456 · HealthALL SAINTS HOME MEDICAL LLCMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $204,024 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $146,460 · Health+17 more: $297,166 · Health+17 morePORTA CAELI HOUSE CORP: $933,334 · OtherPORTA CAELI HOUSE CORPBISHOP KELLEY HIGH SCHOOL: $213,000 · OtherBISHOP KELLEY HIGH SCHOOLTHE CENTER FOR HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC: $185,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR HOUSING SOLUTI…TULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $109,802 · OtherTRAUMA FELLOWSHIP OF OKLAHOMA INC: $108,000 · OtherTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC: $82,500 · OtherCASCIA HALL SCHOOL CORP: $79,750 · Other+28 more: $567,989 · Other+28 moreUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $615,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…REACH OUT AND READ INC: $115,000 · EducationREACH OUT …The University of Tulsa: $75,000 · EducationThe Univer…+2 more: $29,000 · EducationTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $469,358 · Philanthropy+6 more: $62,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR TULSAS FUTURE: $435,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $10,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT OF TULSA COUNTY INC: $108,591 · Human ServicesCROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesEmergency Infant Services Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE SPRING SHELTER INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesPHILOS HOSPITALITY INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $15,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN COUNSELING & GROWTH CENTE: $15,000 · Human ServicesYWCA TULSA INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $14,900 · Human Services+6 more: $51,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $47,800 · Food & NutritionFood on the Move Inc: $16,200 · Food & Nutrition
Health$4,238,432Other$2,279,375Education$834,000Philanthropy$531,358Community Improvement$445,000Human Services$336,991Food & Nutrition$64,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $3,355,326 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $615,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $469,358 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR TULSAS FUTURE: $435,000 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $204,024 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC: $185,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $146,460 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $115,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $109,802 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT OF TULSA COUNTY INC: $108,591 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC: $82,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma Hospital Association Inc: $67,625 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTULSA ZOO MANAGEMENT INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPATHWAYS TO HEALTH COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $59,370 over 7y, 32% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $47,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA DREAM CENTER INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSt John Medical Center Inc: $42,101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $34,475 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARING COMMUNITY FRIENDS INC: $31,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTULSA CHARITY FIGHT NIGHT INC: $23,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SPRING SHELTER INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $19,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTAND 4 JUSTICE MOVEMENT: $19,775 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES INC: $18,300 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOsteopathic Founders Foundation: $18,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetB THE LIGHT MISSION: $17,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFood on the Move Inc: $16,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetARUBAH COMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION: $16,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPHILOS HOSPITALITY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBrady Craft Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetSAMARITAN COUNSELING & GROWTH CENTE: $15,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetYWCA TULSA INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $14,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES: $14,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMANS FOR EQUALITY INC: $14,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCarabelles Legacy Inc: $14,250 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetRIVER PARKS FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetProject Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home: $12,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Uma Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetGREENWOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRI COUNTY TECH ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George Kaiser Family …The Anne and Henry Za…Tulsa Community Found…The Hardesty Family F…Saint Francis Hospita…The Sharna and Irvin …Community Food Bank o…Morningcrest Healthca…Grace & Franklin Bern…The Gelvin FoundationCharles and Lynn Schu…One Gas Foundation Inc
George Kaiser Family FoundationOK71.3× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Saint Francis Hospital Inc · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Community Food Bank of Eastern Oklahoma Inc · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St John Health System Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St John Health System Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 290%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc: 37% of income from government
  • The Center for Housing Solutions Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services: 15% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: 8% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Ywca Tulsa Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
29get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to St John Health System Inc?

Find your warmest path to St John Health System Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on St John Health System’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home