Skip to content
St Francis Regional Medical Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

St Francis Regional Medical Center

St.

$193k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$600kHuman Services$147kRecreation & Sports$92kFood & Nutrition$61kCommunity Improvement$55kYouth Development$45kEducation$30kReligion$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $125,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $193,076 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $68,076 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$277M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCOTT CARVER DAKOTA CAP AGENCY INC$25,000
RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP (DBATHE RIVER VALLEY HEALTH SERVICES)$25,000
SHAKOPEE LIONS FOUNDATION$25,000
ST MARY'S HEALTH CLINIC$25,000
SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY EDUCATION$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $187k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%RIVER VALLEY YMCA: $39k → 5%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $39k → 5%RIVER VALLEY YMCA: $38k → 5%SCOTT CARVER DAKOTA CAP AGENCY INC: $25k → 5%SCOTT CARVER DAKOTA CAP AGENCY: $25k → 5%SCOTT-CARVER-DAKOTA CAP AGENCY INC: $22k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$875k · 10 repeat orgs$171k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$875k
$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+80%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MARYS HEALTH CLINICS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +9%
  • SC
    SCOTT CARVER DAKOTA CAP AGENCY INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $72k · revenue +39%
  • SA
    SHAKOPEE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $55k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • G
    Guild
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +13%
  • BS
    BENEDICTINE SISTERS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION (DBA ST SCHOLASTICA MONASTERY)
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
  • TH
    THE HOPE CHEST FOR BREAST CANCER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue +80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southwestern Mn Opportunity Council

To strengthen our communities through opportunities and service, to help build community resources and help move people out of poverty.

Community Improvement
2
St Cloud Downtown Alliance Foundation

Enhancing and strengthening our community and our regional core.

—
3
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
4
Southeastern North Dakota Community Action Agency

Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…

Human Services
5
South Metro Human Services

Radias health is a non-profit mental health & substance use disorders services organization customizing community based services through the integration of knowledge, compassion, and collaboration. we are committed to being an inclusive,…

Human Services
6
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

—
7
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
8
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
9
Minnesota Pharmacists Association

Serving minnesota pharmacists to advance patient care.

—
10
Royal Promise

Answering the physical and spiritual needs of the most vulnerable, through care and advocacy, to make disciples of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy
11
Care Partners

To assist individuals with cancer and life-limiting illnesses

Health
12
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shakopee Soccer Association; the most unlike its peers is Southwest Metro Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $277,000 · HealthRIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPST MARYS HEALTH CLINICS: $200,000 · HealthST MARYS HEALTH CLINICSGuild: $100,000 · OtherGuildISD 720 - SHAKOPEE: $65,000 · OtherISD 720 - SHAKOPEENEW CREATION LUTHERAN CHURCH: $26,500 · OtherNEW CREATION LUTHERAN CH…SCOTT COUNTY: $15,000 · OtherSCOTT COUNTYBENEDICTINE SISTERS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION (DBA ST SCHOLASTICA MONASTERY): $12,600 · OtherBENEDICTINE SISTERS BENE…+2 more: $11,000 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH: $115,770 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN…SCOTT CARVER DAKOTA CAP AGENCY INC: $71,600 · Human ServicesSCOTT CARVER DAKOTA …SHAKOPEE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $54,601 · Community ImprovementSHAKOPEE LIONS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHWEST METRO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationDISTRICT 112 FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationSHAKOPEE SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE HOPE CHEST FOR BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $12,500 · Philanthropy
Health$477,000Other$230,100Human Services$187,370Community Improvement$79,601Education$40,000Youth Development$20,000Philanthropy$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $277,000 over 8y, 23% of budgetST MARYS HEALTH CLINICS: $200,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH: $115,770 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGuild: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSCOTT CARVER DAKOTA CAP AGENCY INC: $71,600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSHAKOPEE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $54,601 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetSHAKOPEE SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTHE HOPE CHEST FOR BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDISTRICT 112 FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 19% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Allina Health SystemSaint Paul & Minnesot…Ch Robinson Worldwide…The Minneapolis Found…Greater Twin Cities U…The Richard M Schulze…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Allina Health SystemMN17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Allina Health System · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Francis Regional Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Francis Regional Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Francis Regional Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home