Loading…
· Public charity
ST FRANCIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Provide quality health care for the people in scott, carver and western dakota counties, minnesota.
$193k
Granted FY2024
5
Grants
1
Communities
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Health$477kHuman Services$187kCommunity Improvement$80kEducation$40kYouth Development$20kPhilanthropy$13kOther$230k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
—
2020
—
2021
uninsured underinsured
2022
—
2023
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$277M
Total assets
Largest grants
- RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP (DBATHE RIVER VALLEY HEALTH SERVICES)$25,000
- SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY EDUCATION$25,000
- SHAKOPEE LIONS FOUNDATION$25,000
- SCOTT CARVER DAKOTA CAP AGENCY INC$25,000
- ST MARY'S HEALTH CLINIC$25,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $187k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5% — the area typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$875k · 10 repeat orgs$171k to everyone else
10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
10
6
Total granted
$875k
$146k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+6%
+18%
Still filing today
60%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SMST MARY'S HEALTH CLINIC8× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +6%
- SCSCOTT-CARVER-DAKOTA CAP AGENCY INC3× · 2017–2024 · $72k · revenue +31%
- SASHAKOPEE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE3× · 2017–2019 · $55k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- GIGUILD INCone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +18%
- BSBENEDICTINE SISTERS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION (DBA ST SCHOLASTICA MONASTERY)one grant, 2018 · $13k
- HCHOPE CHEST FOR BREAST CANCER FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue +59%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Sioux Center Health
To provide medical care for all ages.
—
2
Possabilities of Southern Minnesota
Training and day services for individuals with developmental disabilities.
—
3
South Dakota Foundation for Medical Care
Collaborate with partners to improve health outcomes.
Health
4
Minnesota Medical Association
Be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state & the best place to practice
—
5
Mental Health Minnesota
Mental Health Minnesota is the voice of lived mental health expenience. We carry that declaration forward as we work to advance mental health and well-being for all, increase access to mental health treatment and services, and provide…
Health
6
Minnesota Business Partnership
To maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans.
—
7
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and
Advance public policy & job growth strategies to create an environment for businesses to prosper
—
8
Minnesota Association of Community
To provide access to high-quality mental and chemical health services for all.
Education
9
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St. Cloud is a nonprofit human services organization that in 2024 served 47,220 individuals of all faiths and beliefs across Central Minnesota.
Human Services
10
Catholic Charities North Dakota
Catholic Charities of North Dakota provides services to people in need across the state of ND.
—
11
Saint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce
Provide a bold voice for business across the saint paul/east metro
—
12
Greater Sioux Community Health
The mission of promise community health center is to provide accessible, holistic health care that adapts to the needs of the community to improve the wellbeing of all persons.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shakopee Soccer Association and the most unlike its peers is Southwest Metro Educational. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$477,000Other$230,100Human Services$187,370Community Improvement$79,601Education$40,000Youth Development$20,000Philanthropy$12,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP (DBATHE RIVER VALLEY HEALTH SERVICES) ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES ↗
- Who funds GUILD INC ↗
- Who funds SCOTT-CARVER-DAKOTA CAP AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds SHAKOPEE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST METRO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHAKOPEE LIONS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHAKOPEE SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE CHEST FOR BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT 112 FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Allina Health SystemMN18× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Allina Health System · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ST FRANCIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP (DBATHE RIVER VALLEY HEALTH SERVICES).
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 202886410 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP (DBATHE RIVER VALLEY HEALTH SERVICES), cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 23% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to St Francis Regional Medical Center?
Find your warmest path to St Francis Regional Medical Center through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines