Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sss Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$201kEducation$62kArts & Culture$60kAnimals$50kReligion$43kHuman Services$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$23kMembership Benefit$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$999k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEADER DOG FOR THE BLIND$5,000
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HOOFBEATS & PAWPRINTS RESCUE$4,500
Individual grant recipient$4,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$4,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$4,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$4,000
PLEASANT ACRE DAY SCHOOL$4,000
CONCORDIA PAWS$3,000
TOYS FOR TOTS NATCHEZ$3,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION MS CHAPTER$3,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$3,000
NATCHEZ ADAMS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LEADER DOG FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 8%LEADER DOG FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 8%LEADER DOG FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 23%LEADER DOG FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 23%LEADER DOG FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 8%LEADER DOG FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 8%LEADER DOG FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 8%LEADER DOG FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 8%LEADER DOG FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MI
NY
MA
IN
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$596k · 44 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
16

Total granted

$596k
$36k

Still filing today

41%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +145%
  • AL
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $41k · revenue +85%
  • LD
    LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • SS
    SENIOR SWIM PROGRAM
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • FH
    FLORENCE HOUSE WOMEN'S SHELTER
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • MH
    MADELINE'S HOUSE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
2
Humane Society of South Mississippi

The mission of the humane society is to save and enhance the lives of pets through cooperative and innovative approaches to adoption, spay/neuter, sheltering and community engagement.

Animals
3
National Association of Children's Hospitals Inc

Nach supports children's hospitals by addressing public policy issues that affect their ability to fulfill their missions to serve children and their families. nach fulfills its mission and vision through federal advocacy, collaboration…

—
4
Take Paws Rescue

The mission of take paws rescue is to meet the moral obligation to protect and save the lives of pets in need of rescue in louisiana. take paws rescue enacts this mission by pulling pets from rural and high kill shelters and preparing them…

Animals
5
Saint Frances Animal Center

Our mission is to provide a safe and nuturing environment for abandoned and mistreated dogs and cats until they can be placed in loving homes.

Animals
6
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
7
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
8
Christus St Michael Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for the charitable, scientific, and educational purposes of advancing, promoting, and supporting the health care ministries of those religious congregations (the "sponsoring…

—
9
Mississippi Animal Rescue League

Aquisition and care for homeless and abused animals prevention of cruelty to animals through education

Animals
10
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
11
Kitties & Kanines Shelter

Our mission is to provide non-lethal solutions to the homeless, abandoned, and feral animal population of fort smith, arkansas. we will do this through re-unifying animals with their owners, adopting animals to new families, or…

Animals
12
Friends of the Scituate Shelter Inc

Providing adoption assistance and veterinary care and grooming for impounded or lost animals. maintain and upkeep the scituate animal shelter. thousands of animals adopted up to date.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Mississippi Chartered; the most unlike its peers is Concordia Paws. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $44,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $37,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERPRESERVATION SOCIETY: $33,000 · OtherPRESERVATION SOCIETYPLEASANT ACRE DAY SCHOOL: $30,000 · OtherPLEASANT ACRE DAY SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $23,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST MARY BASILICA FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $18,000 · OtherTOYS FOR TOTS NATCHEZ: $15,500 · OtherCATHEDRAL SCHOOL TRUST FUND: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION MS CHAPTER: $14,500 · OtherNATCHEZ MASONIC BODIES: $14,500 · OtherNATCHEZ FESTIVAL OF MUSIC: $12,000 · Other+33 more: $86,300 · Other+33 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $50,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESE…AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $41,000 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCL…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI CHARTERED: $24,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION …THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $12,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL …+1 more: $3,000 · HealthHOOFBEATS AND PAWPRINTS RESCUE: $32,000 · AnimalsHOOFBEATS …NATCHEZ-ADAMS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $25,500 · AnimalsNATCHEZ-AD…Concordia Paws: $3,000 · AnimalsLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $37,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $23,000 · InternationalFRENCH CAMP ACADEMY: $16,000 · EducationADAMS COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $2,000 · EducationTHE WILSON RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationNATCHEZ COMMUNITY STEWPOT INC: $4,500 · Food & NutritionFOR NATCHEZ: $2,000 · Arts & CultureArtsNatchez Inc: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$357,800Health$130,000Animals$60,500Human Services$39,000International$23,000Education$19,000Food & Nutrition$4,500Arts & Culture$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $41,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $37,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOOFBEATS AND PAWPRINTS RESCUE: $32,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetNATCHEZ-ADAMS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $25,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI CHARTERED: $24,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRENCH CAMP ACADEMY: $16,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATCHEZ COMMUNITY STEWPOT INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetConcordia Paws: $3,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetKNIGHTS TEMPLAR EYE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA TAU OMEGA FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADAMS COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetArtsNatchez Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE WILSON RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds HOOFBEATS AND PAWPRINTS RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds NATCHEZ-ADAMS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI CHARTERED ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FRENCH CAMP ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds NATCHEZ COMMUNITY STEWPOT INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Concordia Paws ↗
  • Who funds KNIGHTS TEMPLAR EYE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA TAU OMEGA FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Make a Difference FoundationMS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Make a Difference Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sss Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sss Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sss’ filings →

More from the funding graph