Skip to content
Srb Charitable Corporation at a glance

· Private foundation

Srb Charitable Corporation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$38MHealth$6.5MPhilanthropy$5.0MPublic Safety & Disaster$2.5MArts & Culture$2.2MFood & Nutrition$100kHuman Services$50kAnimals$38kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $220k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.4M
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$59M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$2,000,000
SID RICHARDSON MEMORIAL FUND$400,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$100,000
SUNCOAST SCHOOL FOR INNOVATIVE STUDIES INC$70,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS$50,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS INC$28,855
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$20,000
ACCESS HEALTH INTERNATIONAL$10,000
THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 18% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $450k → 22%THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART PS1: $100k → 13%THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $400k → 17%OOS CHARITABLE CORPORATION: $5.0M → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS: $50k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $2.0M → 16%CHINATI FOUNDATION: $50k → 23%GEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM: $25k → 12%SUNCOAST SCHOOL FOR INNOVATIVE STUDIES INC: $70k → 9%ACCESS HEALTH INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 9%CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND: $5.0M → 7%HUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS INC: $29k → 10%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $250k → 22%THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $300k → 17%SID RICHARDSON MEMORIAL FUND: $400k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS: $50k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $75k → 16%GEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM: $25k → 12%CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND: $5.0M → 7%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $250k → 22%THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $300k → 17%SID RICHARDSON MEMORIAL FUND: $400k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS: $50k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $75k → 16%CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND: $5.0M → 7%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $250k → 22%SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS: $1.0M → 17%SID RICHARDSON MEMORIAL FUND: $300k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS: $50k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $75k → 16%CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND: $5.0M → 7%SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS: $1.0M → 17%SID RICHARDSON MEMORIAL FUND: $200k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS: $50k → 14%CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND: $5.0M → 7%SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS: $1.0M → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS: $50k → 14%CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND: $5.0M → 7%SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS: $1.0M → 17%SID RICHARDSON MEMORIAL FUND: $100k → 11%FORT WORTH EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $560k → 11%SAFE CITY PLACE: $2.5M → 11%KIMBELL ART MUSEUM: $1.0M → 11%TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK: $20k → 11%TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK: $20k → 11%TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK: $20k → 11%TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK: $20k → 11%TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44M · 11 repeat orgs$9.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against -43% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$44M
$9.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
-43%

Still filing today

82%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CHARTER FUND INC D/B/A CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND
    6× · 2018–2023 · $30M · revenue +8%
  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    7× · 2018–2024 · $6.2M · revenue +49%
  • SA
    SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $4.0M · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • OC
    OOS CHARITABLE CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $5.0M · revenue -69% · 100% of their budget
  • SC
    Safe City Place
    one grant, 2019 · $2.5M · revenue -77%
  • KA
    KIMBELL ART MUSEUM
    one grant, 2018 · $1.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
2
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
3
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
5
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
12
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charter Fund Inc D/B/a Charter School Growth Fund; the most unlike its peers is Sid Richardson Memorial Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARTER FUND INC D/B/A CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND: $30,000,000 · PhilanthropyCHARTER FUND INC D/B/A CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUNDOOS CHARITABLE CORPORATION: $5,000,000 · PhilanthropyOOS CHARITABLE CORPORATIONBaylor College of Medicine: $6,225,000 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $4,000,000 · EducationSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHO…Sid Richardson Memorial Fund: $1,400,000 · EducationSid Richardson Memorial FundTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,200,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY O…FORT WORTH EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $560,000 · Education+1 more: $70,000 · EducationSafe City Place: $2,498,300 · Community ImprovementKIMBELL ART MUSEUM: $1,000,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY: $400,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY: $140,000 · OtherTarrant Area Food Bank: $100,000 · OtherTHE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART PS1: $100,000 · OtherMuseum of Modern Art: $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHINATI FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureGEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM: $50,000 · Arts & CulturePLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $300,000 · HealthTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $50,000 · HealthHUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS: $28,855 · AnimalsHumane Society of North Texas: $9,000 · AnimalsACCESS HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · International
Philanthropy$35,000,000Education$13,455,000Community Improvement$2,498,300Other$1,740,000Arts & Culture$1,100,000Health$350,000Animals$37,855International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARTER FUND INC D/B/A CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND: $30,000,000 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $6,225,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOOS CHARITABLE CORPORATION: $5,000,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $4,000,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSid Richardson Memorial Fund: $1,400,000 over 5y, 41% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $1,000,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFORT WORTH EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $560,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $300,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSUNCOAST SCHOOL FOR INNOVATIVE STUDIES INC: $70,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE CHINATI FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS: $28,855 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetACCESS HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHumane Society of North Texas: $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA8.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Srb Charitable Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Srb Charitable Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Srb Charitable Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to Srb Charitable Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Srb’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home