Skip to content

· Private foundation

Squam Lake Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$400k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.3MHuman Services$434kArts & Culture$352kHousing & Shelter$221kFood & Nutrition$210kYouth Development$50kReligion$5k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $250k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$150,000
MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC$37,000
WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$30,000
INTERFAITH OUTREACH & COMMUNITY PARTNERS$30,000
THE BASILICA OF ST MARYST VINCENT DE PAUL MINISTRY$25,000
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$20,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION TWIN CITIES$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
BANYAN COMMUNITY$20,000
SIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC$18,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$15,000
TUBMAN$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $166k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNION GOSPEL MISSION TWIN CITIES: $20k → 14%UNION GOSPEL MISSION TWIN CITIES: $10k → 14%UNION GOSPEL MISSION TWIN CITIES: $10k → 14%UNION GOSPEL MISSION TWIN CITIES: $10k → 14%UNION GOSPEL MISSION TWIN CITIES: $5k → 14%UNION GOSPEL MISSION TWIN CITIES: $4k → 14%UNION GOSPEL MISSION TWIN CITIES: $4k → 14%UNION GOSPEL MISSION TWIN CITIES: $3k → 14%UNION GOSPEL MISSION TWIN CITIES: $3k → 14%SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $20k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $20k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $18k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $15k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $10k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $10k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 18 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$1.3M
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
-12%

Still filing today

61%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureReligionPhilanthropyFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +37%
  • IO
    INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $159k · revenue +58%
  • SA
    SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $93k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BASILICA OF SAINT MARY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -12%
  • SV
    SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL-TWIN CITIES
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
2
Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services Inc

Strengthen central mn communities through leadership in workforce excellence.

—
3
Mental Health Resources Inc

The mission of mental health resources is to foster hope, health and recovery for people affected by mental illness and substance use disorder.

—
4
Minnesota Assistance Council for Veterans

Minnesota assistance council for veterans (macv) is dedicated to a mission to end veteran homelessness in minnesota. macv provides services to veterans who are homeless or at risk of homelessness throughout minnesota in areas of housing,…

Employment
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

—
7
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
8
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
9
Minnesota Institute for Talented Youth

Mity's mission is to inspire and challenge intellectually curious students to pursue their passions within a diverse, inclusive community and empower them by building skills and relationships for lifelong success.

—
10
Missions Inc Programs

See Schedule O.Established in 1895, Missions Inc. Programs is a multi-service non-profit organization with a long history of providing services to those who are most in need, each year offering thousands of people, whose lives have been…

—
11
Senior Community Services

Our mission is empowering people as they age.

Human Services
12
Minnesota Acts Now

Crime and communities violence interve

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners; the most unlike its peers is Madeline Island Chamber Music co Taft Stettinius & Hollister Llp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC: $1,225,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC+1 more: $25,000 · HealthINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $159,000 · OtherINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY…Madeline Island Chamber Music co Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP: $158,000 · OtherMadeline Island Chamber Music co …WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $158,000 · OtherWESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHTHE BASILICA OF ST MARYST VINCENT DE PAUL MINISTRY: $97,500 · OtherTHE BASILICA OF ST MARYST VINCENT…SIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC: $71,000 · OtherSIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INCIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $25,000 · Other+4 more: $36,750 · OtherMACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC: $190,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $3,500 · Arts & CultureSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $93,000 · Human ServicesUNION GOSPEL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF ST PAUL INC: $67,500 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesAGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC: $52,500 · ReligionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $52,000 · Food & NutritionThe Banyan Foundation: $50,000 · Community ImprovementMINNESOTA MILITARY FAMILY FOUNDATION: $22,500 · Philanthropy
Health$1,250,000Other$735,250Arts & Culture$193,500Human Services$165,500Religion$52,500Food & Nutrition$52,000Community Improvement$50,000Philanthropy$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC: $1,225,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC: $190,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $159,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMadeline Island Chamber Music co Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP: $158,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $93,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC: $71,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF ST PAUL INC: $67,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC: $52,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $52,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Banyan Foundation: $50,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTUBMAN: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA MILITARY FAMILY FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MINNESOTA SINFONIA: $3,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds Madeline Island Chamber Music co Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP ↗
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF ST PAUL INC ↗
  • Who funds AGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds The Banyan Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TUBMAN ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA MILITARY FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MINNESOTA SINFONIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Squam Lake Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Squam Lake Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Squam Lake’s filings →

    More from the funding graph