Skip to content

· Public charity

Spruce Root Inc

See schedule oto assist southeast alaskas people, businesses, and communities in reaching long-term economic, social, and environmental resilience, and improve economic conditions in southeast alaska communities through innovation, sustainability and collaboration.

$908k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$134k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$1.9MCommunity Improvement$218kHuman Services$171kCivil Rights$110kFood & Nutrition$82kPublic Benefit$77kReligion$61kHousing & Shelter$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $658,529, the rows itemized in this filing. The $907,991 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $249,462 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $234k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $419k
$47,347
Median grant
2
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETY$134,000
ECOTRUST$89,080
HOONAH INDIAN ASSOCIATION$87,000
CENTRAL COUNCIL OF TLINGIT & HAIDA INDIAN TRIBES OF ALASKA (TLINGIT & HAIDA$55,000
KLAWOCK COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (KCA)$53,468
AWARE$47,347
RENEWABLE ENERGY ALASKA PROJECT$42,000
KOOTZNOOWOO INCORPORATED$42,000
SKAGWAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$42,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ALASKA CHAPTER$41,933
SHAAN SEET$18,701
SOUTHEAST CONFERENCE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE: $53k → 12%YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE: $40k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 14 repeat orgs$241k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$2.3M
$182k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+40%

Still filing today

43%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $518k · revenue +47%
  • ECOTRUST
    3× · 2022–2024 · $177k · revenue +63%
  • RE
    RENEWABLE ENERGY ALASKA PROJECT
    4× · 2021–2024 · $144k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • OV
    ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KASAAN
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • JK
    Jilkaat Kwaan Heritage Centergraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $42k · revenue +40%
  • CC
    CENTRAL COUNCIL OF TLINGIT & HAIDA
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Association Educational Foundation Inc
Environment
2
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council Inc-Seacc

SEACC's mission is to protect the special places of the world's largest temperate rainforest, promote conservation, and advocate for sustainability in human use of natural resources. Inspired by the land, wildlife, cultures, and…

Environment
3
Alaska Wildlife Alliance

Support ecosystem-based wildlife management by increasing public awareness of wildlife issues, responding to information requests, advocating for science-based wildlife habitat management through proposal and comment submissions, and…

Environment
4
Northern Alaska Environmental Center

Since 1971, the northern alaska environmental center has promoted environmental conservation and sustainable resource stewardship in interior and arctic alaska through education and advocacy.

Environment
5
Katmai Conservancy

Katmai Conservancy supports the preservation of Katmai National Park and Preserve its unique ecosystems scenic character and associated natural and cultural resources by promoting greater public interest appreciation and support through…

Environment
6
Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission

The Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission (Commission), based in Utqiagvik, Alaska, is a nonprofit corporation organized for the purpose of preserving and enhancing the marine resources of Bowhead whales including protection of habitat, Eskimo…

—
7
Alaska Historical Publication Association
Education
8
Southeast Alaska Wilderness Exploration Analysis and Discovery

Our organization supports community-based approaches to social, economic and environmental sustainability in Southeast Alaska.

Environment
9
Ahtna Intertribal Resource Commission

The core purpose of AITRC is "traditional resource stewardship." The core values are "survival; protect and enhance subsistence resources; and partnerships." The vision statement is "our way of life and cultural tradition is unified and…

Environment
10
Southeast Alaska Indiginous Transboundary Commissi

Protecting tribal land and waterways for future generations

Animals
11
Alaska Sustainability Initiative

To advance solutions that build the resilience and sustainability of Alaska, for its current and future residents and the natural systems upon which they depend.

Animals
12
Bering Sea Fishermens Association

Western alaska fisheries support and restoration.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southeast Alaska Watershed Coalition; the most unlike its peers is The Nature Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOONAH INDIAN ASSOCIATION: $594,000 · OtherHOONAH INDIAN ASSOCIATIONECOTRUST: $177,080 · OtherECOTRUSTCENTRAL COUNCIL OF TLINGIT & HAIDA INDIAN TRIBES OF ALASKA (TLINGIT & HAIDA: $132,224 · OtherCENTRAL COUNCIL OF TLINGIT & HAIDA INDIAN TRIBES OF ALASKA (TLINGIT & HAID…KLAWOCK COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION: $131,500 · OtherKLAWOCK COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY ALASKA CHAPTER: $102,933 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY ALASKA CHAPTERAWARE Inc: $95,347 · OtherAWARE IncKOOTZNOOWOO INCORPORATED: $84,000 · OtherBARNACLE FOODS: $82,000 · OtherORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE: $76,540 · OtherSHAAN SEET: $60,701 · Other+9 more: $249,468 · Other+9 moreSITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $517,753 · EnvironmentSITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETYRENEWABLE ENERGY ALASKA PROJECT: $144,000 · EnvironmentRENEWABLE ENERGY ALASKA PROJE…SOUTHEAST ALASKA WATERSHED COALITION: $45,000 · EnvironmentSOUTHEAST ALASKA WATERSHED CO…THE YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE NONPROFIT: $93,250 · Human ServicesSKAGWAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $76,070 · Community ImprovementJilkaat Kwaan Heritage Center: $42,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,785,793Environment$706,753Human Services$93,250Community Improvement$76,070Arts & Culture$42,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $517,753 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetECOTRUST: $177,080 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetRENEWABLE ENERGY ALASKA PROJECT: $144,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetAWARE Inc: $95,347 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE NONPROFIT: $93,250 over 2y, 82% of budgetSKAGWAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $76,070 over 3y, 10% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST ALASKA WATERSHED COALITION: $45,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetJilkaat Kwaan Heritage Center: $42,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetThe Southeast Conference: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ECOTRUST ↗
  • Who funds RENEWABLE ENERGY ALASKA PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds AWARE Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE NONPROFIT ↗
  • Who funds SKAGWAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST ALASKA WATERSHED COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Jilkaat Kwaan Heritage Center ↗
  • Who funds The Southeast Conference ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rasmuson FoundationAK19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc · The Alaska Community Foundation · Alaska Conservation Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Spruce Root Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Spruce Root Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Ecotrust: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Spruce Root Inc?

Find your warmest path to Spruce Root Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Spruce Root’s filings →

More from the funding graph