Skip to content

· Public charity

Springwell Inc

Springwell helps individuals improve their quality of life and reduce their need for residential care by helping them access community resources.

$94M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$723kHealth$393kHuman Services$142kHousing & Shelter$70kCommunity Improvement$50kYouth Development$35kRecreation & Sports$15k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $259,988, the rows itemized in this filing. The $94,492,629 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $94,232,641 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$44M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES$110,000
HUDSON COA$30,992
HEALTHY WALTHAM$15,000
WESTON COA$15,000
GREATER BOSTON CHINESE$15,000
NEWTON HOUSING$15,000
GOOD SHEPARD COMMUNITY CARE$14,760
METROWEST YMCA$12,500
NATICK COA$8,910
HEALTHY WALTHAM$8,500
GREATER BOSTON CHINESE$8,326
ENHANCE ASIAN COMMUNITY ON HEALTH INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $152k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NORTHBOROUGH HELPING HANDS: $10k → 11%GREATER BOSTON CHINESE: $15k → 16%GREATER BOSTON CHINESE: $15k → 16%GREATER BOSTON CHINESE GOLDEN AGE CENTER: $9k → 16%GREATER BOSTON CHINESE GOLDEN AGE CENTER: $9k → 16%GREATER BOSTON CHINESE GOLDEN AGE CENTER: $9k → 16%GREATER BOSTON CHINESE GOLDEN AGE CENTER: $9k → 16%GREATER BOSTON CHINESE: $8k → 16%GREATER BOSTON CHINESE: $8k → 16%GREATER BOSTON CHINESE GOLDEN AGE CENTER: $7k → 16%GREATER BOSTON CHINESE GOLDEN AGE CENTER: $7k → 16%METRO WEST YMCA: $14k → 8%METROWEST YMCA: $13k → 8%METROWEST YMCA: $13k → 8%METRO WEST YMCA: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 12 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$1.3M
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+60%

Still filing today

58%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ML
    METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $723k · revenue +197%
  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON CHINESE GOLDEN AGE CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $99k · revenue +42%
  • MY
    METROWEST YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $44k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • BB
    BUSY BEE TRANSPORTATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $37k
  • WP
    WAYLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
  • FS
    Framingham State Univ
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Visiting Nurse & Community Health Inc

We are committed to providing the highest quality, compassionate home care to the patients entrusted to us. We are also steadfast in our pledge to be a responsive and innovative advocate for the communities we serve, focusing on health…

—
2
Massachusetts E-Health Collaborative
—
3
Northeast Arc Inc

Helping adults and children with disabilities, (incl asd), become full participants in the community.

—
4
Lowell Community Health Center Inc

Lowell community health center's mission is to provide caring, quality, and culturally competent health services to the people of greater lowell, regardless of their financial status; to reduce health disparities and enhance the health of…

Health
5
Eastern Area Agency on Aging

It is the mission of Eastern Area Agency on Aging to be the best source of information, options, and services for seniors, adults with disabilities, and caregivers.

Human Services
6
Access Care Partners Inc

Westmass eldercare, inc. is an aging services access point and designated area agency on aging that provides services which include in-home support, informational services, nursing home advocacy, legal assistance, meal site transportation…

Human Services
7
Harvard Street Neighborhood Health Center Inc

Harvard street neighborhood health center serves as the primary health resource to our community, through the delivery of comprehensive patient-centered medical care.

Health
8
Jewish Family Service of Metrowest Inc

Jewish family service of metrowest, inc, a non-profit agency, provides vital social, health and community services to alleviate suffering, enhance lives and support people in need.

Human Services
9
Community Servings Inc

Community servings' mission is to actively engage the community to provide medically tailored, nutritious, scratch-made meals and medically tailored groceries to chronically and critically ill individuals and their families.

Human Services
10
Merrimack Valley Food Bank Inc

The focus of the merrimack valley food bank is to help meet a person's most profound need - adequate nutrition and freedom from hunger. only through cooperative efforts can society initiate change, develop strategies to alleviate hunger,…

Food & Nutrition
11
Health Equity Partnership of North Central Mass Inc

To bring together and support diverse voices to promote health equity in the 27 cities and towns of north central massachusetts.

Community Improvement
12
Northeast Center for Youth and Families Inc

Provide a range of high-quality, community-based, behavioral health services to empower individuals and families to live healthy and successful lives.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advocates Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Cricket Fdn Jennifer L Grigg Trustee. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES INC: $723,266 · OtherMETROWEST LEGAL SERVICES INCTOWN OF HUDSON: $98,243 · OtherTOWN OF HUDSONCROSSROADS COUNSELING: $75,000 · OtherCROSSROADS COUNSELINGNEWTON HOUSING: $70,000 · OtherNEWTON HOUSING+8 more: $197,868 · Other+8 moreGREATER BOSTON CHINESE GOLDEN AGE CENTER: $98,750 · Human ServicesGREATER BOST…METROWEST YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $43,711 · Human ServicesMETROWEST YO…NORTHBOROUGH HELPING HANDS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNORTHBOROUGH…Healthy Waltham Inc: $84,000 · HealthADVOCATES INC: $15,000 · HealthENHANCE ASIAN COMMUNITY ON HEALTH INC: $12,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,164,377Human Services$152,461Health$99,000Philanthropy$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETROWEST LEGAL SERVICES INC: $723,266 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetGREATER BOSTON CHINESE GOLDEN AGE CENTER: $98,750 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHealthy Waltham Inc: $84,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMETROWEST YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $43,711 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $29,540 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCATES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENHANCE ASIAN COMMUNITY ON HEALTH INC: $12,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetNORTHBOROUGH HELPING HANDS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 17% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON CHINESE GOLDEN AGE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Healthy Waltham Inc ↗
  • Who funds METROWEST YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CRICKET FDN JENNIFER L GRIGG TRUSTEE ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds ENHANCE ASIAN COMMUNITY ON HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHBOROUGH HELPING HANDS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA15.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Metrowest Health Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Baypath Elder Services Inc · Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Springwell Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Springwell Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Advocates Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Enhance Asian Community On Health Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Metrowest Legal Services Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Metrowest Young Men's Christian Association Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Healthy Waltham Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Springwell’s filings →

More from the funding graph