Skip to content
Springfield Pregnancy Care Center Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Springfield Pregnancy Care Center Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$700
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$600
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$3kInternational$1kReligion$860Civil Rights$803Philanthropy$754Human Services$700Education$300Youth Development$300Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$600
Median grant
1
States reached
$127k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Clearway Clinic$600
Springfield Rescue Mission$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $700) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Springfield Rescue Mission: $200 → 17%Springfield Rescue Mission: $200 → 17%Springfield Rescue Mission: $200 → 17%Springfield Rescue Mission: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
MA
OH
UT
MO
AZ
TN
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7k · 10 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$7k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+90%

Still filing today

60%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalReligionEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CLEARWAY CLINIC INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +30%
  • H4
    HOPE 4 KIDS INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2021–2023 · $600 · revenue +32%
  • HI
    HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $550 · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HOMESTEAD FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $254 · revenue ×36
  • HH
    Heritage House Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $214 · revenue -11%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $200
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Intimate Life Ministries
—
2
Birthmother Bridge Ministries
—
3
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
4
Mission Pre-Born Inc

Mission: pre-born, inc. was formed as an indiana not-for-profit organization in 2007 and is a results oriented ministry designed to strategically impact the abortion industry. mission: pre-born has the following mission and values (see…

Human Services
5
Heartbeats for Life

Heartbeats is a life-affirming ministry committed to impacting the lives we serve with the love of christ. see schedule o for complete mission statement.

Civil Rights
6
Lifesource Ministries Inc

Christ-centered organization dedicated to empowering women with the truth and hope they need to choose life. develop and distribution of informational and educational materials.

Health
7
Brookshire New Birth Ministries

To provide a transitional living faclity for battered women, women released from prison and women rehabing from drug addiction

Human Services
8
Refuge for Prodigals International Bible Ministries Inc
Religion
9
Tender Life Maternity Home

Tender Life is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help and hope for women during their pregnancies and beyond.

Housing & Shelter
10
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
11
One Life Ministries
Religion
12
Options a Pregnancy Resource Center Inc

The organization strives to offer hope, help, and healing to women facing an unplanned pregnancy.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 40 Days for Life; the most unlike its peers is The Homestead Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEARWAY CLINIC INC: $3,300 · HealthCLEARWAY CLINIC INCHeritage House Inc: $214 · HealthHeritage House IncPro-Life of Pioneer Valley: $700 · OtherPro-Life of Pioneer ValleyHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC: $550 · OtherHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INCTeen Challenge: $300 · OtherTeen ChallengeGIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $200 · OtherGIDEONS INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient: $200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe Q: $200 · OtherThe QThe Glorious Harvest Hope Chapel: $200 · OtherThe Glorious Harvest Hope ChapelIndividual grant recipient: $100 · OtherRenew Massachusetts Coalition Inc: $100 · OtherSPRINGFIELD RESCUE MISSION: $700 · Human ServicesSPRINGFIE…HOPE 4 KIDS INTERNATIONAL: $600 · InternationalRBC MINISTRIES: $460 · Religion40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $300 · EducationTHE HOMESTEAD FOUNDATION INC: $254 · PhilanthropyBIKING FOR BABIES: $103 · Civil Rights
Health$3,514Other$2,550Human Services$700International$600Religion$460Education$300Philanthropy$254Civil Rights$103

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLEARWAY CLINIC INC: $3,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPRINGFIELD RESCUE MISSION: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE 4 KIDS INTERNATIONAL: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRBC MINISTRIES: $460 over 2y, 0.0% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOMESTEAD FOUNDATION INC: $254 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHeritage House Inc: $214 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIKING FOR BABIES: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRenew Massachusetts Coalition Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Springfield Pregnancy Care Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Springfield Pregnancy Care Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Springfield Pregnancy Care Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home