Skip to content

· Private foundation

Spring Garden Soup Society

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$100kHousing & Shelter$88kFood & Nutrition$84kReligion$48kEducation$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$601k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Whosoever Gospel Mission$8,000
St Francis Inn$8,000
The City School$8,000
Norris Square Senior Center$8,000
Face to Face (St Vincent's)$8,000
Feast of Justice$8,000
St John's Hospice$8,000
Sherwood Christian Outreach$8,000
Small Things$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%The Simple Way: $8k → 22%The Simple Way: $8k → 22%The Simple Way: $5k → 22%The Sunday Love Project: $1k → 22%Whosoever Gospel Mission: $11k → 22%Whosoever Gospel Mission: $8k → 22%Whosoever Gospel Mission: $8k → 22%Whosoever Gospel Mission: $8k → 22%Feast for Justice: $8k → 22%Feast for Justice: $8k → 22%Feast for Justice: $8k → 22%Feast of Justice: $8k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$345k · 13 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$345k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%
+143%

Still filing today

46%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WG
    WHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION AND RES CUE HOME ASSO OF GERMANTOWN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $49k · revenue +45%
  • TC
    The City School
    6× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +150%
  • FO
    FEAST OF JUSTICE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $32k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • PH
    Penn Home
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • TS
    THE SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +143%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bread of Life Community Services
Food & Nutrition
2
New Jerusalem Outreach Ministries

Provide human social educational and spiritual services to individuals in the community

Religion
3
Two Ladies of Christ Inc

The primary purpose of our organization is to provide outreach to the at-risk, low income residents of the Philadelphia Metropolitan area by providing non-perishable foods, personal needs and informal education.

Human Services
4
Salaam Food Pantry

Support those in need (including senior citizens, disabled persons) with food,groceries and hot lunch in our community and give everyone an opportunity to be part of the cause.

Human Services
5
Light of the World Neighborhood and Economic Development Inc

Assist homeless, hungry, and people in low income communities.

Community Improvement
6
Feed My Sheep Homeless Outreach

To provide food for the homeless

—
7
Loaves & Fishes the Church Without Walls

Community outreach and church services

Religion
8
Feed the City Inc

Provide food & clothing to the public

Food & Nutrition
9
Seven Stars Christian Church

Mission Church

Religion
10
Gods Bounty Inc

Supplying food to low income residents

Food & Nutrition
11
Joshuas Mission of Hope Inc

Giving hope to disadvantaged children

Education
12
Faith House Ministries

Community outreach

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Whosoever Gospel Mission and Res Cue Home Asso of Germantown; the most unlike its peers is Sherwood Christian Outreach Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The City School: $44,615 · OtherThe City SchoolNorris Square Senior Center: $32,000 · OtherNorris Square Senior CenterSaint John's Hospice: $32,000 · OtherSaint John's HospiceST FRANCIS INN: $32,000 · OtherST FRANCIS INNSt Vincents Soup KitchenFace to Face: $24,000 · OtherSt Vincents Soup KitchenFace to FaceSaint Vincent's Soup Kitchen/Face to Face: $14,220 · OtherSaint Vincent's Soup Kitchen/Face to FaceNorris Square Senior Citizens Center: $14,220 · OtherNorris Square Senior Citizens CenterSherwood Presbyterian Church: $14,220 · OtherSherwood Presbyterian ChurchFace to Face (St Vincent's): $8,000 · Other+3 more: $13,510 · Other+3 moreWHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION AND RES CUE HOME ASSO OF GERMANTOWN: $49,320 · Human ServicesWHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION AND RES…FEAST OF JUSTICE: $32,000 · Human ServicesFEAST OF JUSTICETHE SIMPLE WAY: $21,000 · Human ServicesTHE SIMPLE WAY+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesSHERWOOD CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTER: $33,068 · ReligionSHERWOOD C…
Other$228,785Human Services$103,320Religion$33,068

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION AND RES CUE HOME ASSO OF GERMANTOWN: $49,320 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetThe City School: $44,615 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSHERWOOD CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTER: $33,068 over 4y, 11% of budgetFEAST OF JUSTICE: $32,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSaint John's Hospice: $32,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SIMPLE WAY: $21,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetSMALL THINGS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION AND RES CUE HOME ASSO OF GERMANTOWN ↗
  • Who funds The City School ↗
  • Who funds SHERWOOD CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FEAST OF JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds Saint John's Hospice ↗
  • Who funds THE SIMPLE WAY ↗
  • Who funds SMALL THINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PhilabundancePA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Philabundance · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family Foundation Inc · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Connelly Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Spring Garden Soup Society funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Spring Garden Soup Society. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Spring Garden Soup Society?

    Find your warmest path to Spring Garden Soup Society through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Spring Garden Soup Society’s filings →

    More from the funding graph