Skip to content

· Private foundation

Spring Forth Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$319k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$162k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.1MInternational$1.1MCivil Rights$55kCommunity Improvement$13kEducation$10kAnimals$8kHuman Services$7kPublic Benefit$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $224k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$642k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GENERALS INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES$162,000
DUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES$62,000
LAMPLIGHTER MINISTRIES$34,000
THE CENTER FOR GLOCAL LEADERSHIP$18,000
ASCEND MINISTRY$10,000
HARBOR LIGHT CHURCH$7,500
PIVOTING TO POWER$5,000
HEART 180$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CAPITOL HILL CHRISTIAN EMBASSY$2,000
HOPE FOR THE HARVEST$2,000
BREATH OF THE SPIRIT MINISTRY$2,000
THE WILDFIRE FUND$1,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$1,000
A GENEROSITY PROJECT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%KINGDOM AUTHORITY MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 11%HEARTS OF MERCY: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
OR
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
SC
DC
HI
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 24 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
24

Total granted

$2.4M
$132k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+5%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $245k · revenue +129%
  • LM
    LAMPLIGHTER MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $226k · revenue +73% · 26% of their budget
  • CH
    Christian Harvest International Min
    3× · 2020–2023 · $15k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • HF
    HEARTCRY FOR CHANGE USA
    one grant, 2017 · $55k
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR GLOCAL LEADERSHIP
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
  • KC
    KINGS CATHEDRAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
2
Equippers Group International

To produce and publish training materials for church leadership and development. To facilitate churches groups and individual participation in world mission.

Religion
3
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
4
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
5
Alongside Education Ministries Inc

Pastor training

—
6
Crusades International Inc

Ministry education and instruction

Philanthropy
7
International Christian Publishers

Religious corp, charitable, educational and cultural, conduct all activities relate to publishingchristian literature

Religion
8
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
9
Grateful Shepherd Ministries

Training pastors and leaders in christian faith

Religion
10
Making Jesus Known Evangelistic Ministries

Preaching the message of Jesus Christ around the world through large events.

—
11
Christian Ministries International

Christian evangelism, missions, and training through seminars, literature, and counseling.

—
12
Christian Ministries International
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commission to Every Nation; the most unlike its peers is Highway 19 Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GENERALS INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $965,500 · OtherGENERALS INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIESIndividual grant recipient: $221,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRINITY CHURCH: $161,750 · OtherTRINITY CHURCHLAMPLIGHTER MINISTRIES: $149,000 · OtherLAMPLIGHTER MINISTRIESDUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES: $114,500 · OtherDUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES+33 more: $316,100 · Other+33 moreDUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INC: $244,500 · ReligionDUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INCLAMPLIGHTER MINISTRIES INC: $225,900 · ReligionLAMPLIGHTER MINISTRIES INCCENTER FOR GLOCAL LEADERSHIP: $106,650 · ReligionCENTER FOR GLOCAL LEADERSHI…+8 more: $34,000 · Religion+8 moreFEED MY SHEEP INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesKingdom Authority Ministeries Inter: $3,200 · Human ServicesHEARTS OF MERCY: $1,000 · Human ServicesWILD HEART RANCH INC: $7,500 · HealthGLOBAL CAPITAL CONNECTIONS INC: $4,000 · International
Other$1,928,450Religion$611,050Human Services$9,200Health$7,500International$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INC: $244,500 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetLAMPLIGHTER MINISTRIES INC: $225,900 over 6y, 26% of budgetCENTER FOR GLOCAL LEADERSHIP: $106,650 over 6y, 23% of budgetChristian Harvest International Min: $14,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBELLEVUE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENCOUNTERS NETWORK A MINISTRY TO THE NATIONS: $9,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE CALL: $7,500 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetWILD HEART RANCH INC: $7,500 over 4y, 12% of budgetBRIDGE BUILDERS INTERNATIONAL: $5,200 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFEED MY SHEEP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBAL CAPITAL CONNECTIONS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetKingdom Authority Ministeries Inter: $3,200 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTRADITIONAL VALUES COALITION: $1,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetMODERN DAY MISSIONS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTS OF MERCY: $1,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetHighway 19 Ministries: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LAMPLIGHTER MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR GLOCAL LEADERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Christian Harvest International Min ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVUE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ENCOUNTERS NETWORK A MINISTRY TO THE NATIONS ↗
  • Who funds THE CALL ↗
  • Who funds WILD HEART RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE BUILDERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY SHEEP INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CAPITAL CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Kingdom Authority Ministeries Inter ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS14.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Spring Forth Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Spring Forth Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Spring Forth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph