Skip to content

· Private foundation

Spratt Leah Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$286kEducation$51kHealth$45kYouth Development$21kHuman Services$19kCivil Rights$14kHousing & Shelter$14kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
$4,270
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pony Express National Museum$18,822
Pony Express PumpkinFest Inc$10,000
The Allied Arts Council - Arts Fund$7,000
MOSAIC LIFE CARE FOUNDATION$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
MWSU Foundation$5,000
Social Welfare Board$4,270
Individual grant recipient$3,000
YWCA USA$2,500
Freudenthal Center for Parkinson's$2,000
Cotillion for Achievement$1,500
Girl Scouts of NE Kansas & NW MO$1,000
YMCA of Greater Omaha$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA of Greater Omaha: $1k → 12%YWCA USA: $3k → 14%YWCA USA: $3k → 14%YWCA USA: $3k → 14%YWCA USA: $3k → 14%YWCA USA: $3k → 14%YWCA USA: $3k → 14%YWCA USA: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$450k · 18 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +94% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
10

Total granted

$450k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
0%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MW
    MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +1%
  • HF
    Heartland Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +95%
  • YU
    YWCA USA INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • PE
    PONY EXPRESS HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +85%
  • HS
    HISTORIC ST JOSEPH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • IF
    INTERSERV FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
2
Young Men's Christian Association

The burbank community ymca (burbank y) is committed to strengthening the foundation of our community through youth development, healthy living, and social responsibility. we work within our community to ensure that everyone, regardless of…

Human Services
3
National Housing Conference Inc

The national housing conference has been defending the american home since 1931. we believe everyone in america should have equal opportunity to live in a quality, affordable home in a thriving community. nhc convenes and collaborates with…

Housing & Shelter
4
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Kansas City

The ymca of greater kansas city founded on christian principles is a charitable organization with an inclusive environment committed to enriching the quality of family, spiritual, social, mental and physical well-being.

Human Services
5
Illinois Pork Producers Association

To improve the quality, production efficiency, and promotion of pork. representation and advocacy in regulatory and policy issues affecting the pork industry.

—
6
Missouri Jobs With Justice

Educate the community on workers' rights

Employment
7
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
8
Missouri Historical Society

The missouri historical society (mhs) is a missouri pro forma decree, not-for-profit corporation whose primary functions are educational and community programs; collections and conservation; library and research; and exhibitions.…

Arts & Culture
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
11
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
12
Young Womens Christian Association

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism and empowering women.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Second Harvest Community Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is New Generation Singers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pony Express National Museum: $101,452 · OtherPony Express National MuseumMISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · OtherMISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $36,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe Allied Arts Council - Arts Fund: $36,000 · OtherThe Allied Arts Council - Arts FundARTS FUND: $21,000 · OtherARTS FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherTUSKEGEE EAGLES OF ST JOSEPH INC: $15,000 · OtherSocial Welfare Board: $13,870 · OtherAllied Arts Council: $13,000 · Other+11 more: $38,500 · Other+11 morePONY EXPRESS PUMPKIN FEST INC: $70,000 · Arts & CulturePONY EXPRESS PUMP…PONY EXPRESS HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & CulturePONY EXPRESS HIST…Heartland Foundation: $23,320 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $12,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthYWCA USA INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesYMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $1,000 · Human ServicesPIVOTAL POINT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING INC: $11,000 · EducationINTERSERV FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$329,822Arts & Culture$75,000Health$36,820Human Services$18,500Education$11,000Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPONY EXPRESS PUMPKIN FEST INC: $70,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetMISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHeartland Foundation: $23,320 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA USA INC: $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPIVOTAL POINT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetINTERSERV FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST MISSOURI CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW GENERATION SINGERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetYMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PONY EXPRESS PUMPKIN FEST INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Heartland Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YWCA USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PIVOTAL POINT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds PONY EXPRESS HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERSERV FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST MISSOURI CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NEW GENERATION SINGERS INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Northwest MissouriincMO22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Northwest Missouriinc · Norma J and William J Kenney Charitable · Harold P Dugdale Charitable Trust · Wm and Margaret Schreiber Char Tr · Harry and Helena Messick Charitable Tr · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Killackey Charitable Tr Commerce Trust · The Depriest Family Foundation Inc · Heartland Regional Medical Center · Edward Jones Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Spratt Leah Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Spratt Leah Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Spratt Leah’s filings →

    More from the funding graph