Skip to content

· Private foundation

Spitzer Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0170% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Religion$16kArts & Culture$10kPhilanthropy$4kHealth$4kEducation$3kHuman Services$783Other$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$7,148
Median grant
2
States reached
$135k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$14,940
VARIOUS CONTRUBUTIONS UNDER 1500$7,148
THE DONORS FUND$2,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BONEI OLAM: $474 → 20%Bonei Olam: $368 → 20%Bonei Olam: $59 → 20%Bonei Olam: $59 → 20%Bonei Olam: $59 → 20%Misaskim Corp: $18 → 20%Chaim Medical Resource: $18 → 20%Bobbies Place: $405 → 20%Bobbiesplace: $360 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27k · 8 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +55% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
34

Total granted

$27k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+55%

Still filing today

63%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DG
    DAILY GIVING INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $4k · revenue +501%
  • BO
    Bonei Olam Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1k · revenue +77%
  • BP
    BOBBIES PLACE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $765 · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • V
    Various
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • CK
    Cong Khal Skwera (Check 9991)
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • YM
    Yeshivas Mir Yerushalayim (Check 9990)
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ksav Sofer Inc
Philanthropy
2
Hashevaynu Inc

The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.

Education
3
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
4
Tzohar Halev Inc

Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel

Education
5
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
6
Yeshivas Ohr Yissochor Academy Inc

To operate a school in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
7
Nezer Yisroel Inc
—
8
Chevra Ahavas Chesed Inc

Assistance in religious burials

Membership Benefit
9
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
10
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
11
Keren Avraham Shmuel Inc Wachman
Philanthropy
12
Hayashar Vehatov Inc

The furtherance of primacy of orthodox jewish jurisprudence

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chaim Medical Resource Inc; the most unlike its peers is TorahAnytimeCom Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS CONTRUBUTIONS UNDER 1500: $16,829 · OtherVARIOUS CONTRUBUTIONS UNDER 1500Individual grant recipient: $14,940 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVarious: $5,240 · OtherVariousCong Khal Skwera (Check 9991): $5,000 · OtherCong Khal Skwera (Check 9991)Yeshivas Mir Yerushalayim (Check 9990): $4,500 · OtherYeshivas Mir Yerushalayim (Check 9990)+26 more: $6,229 · Other+26 moreDAILY GIVING INC: $3,768 · PhilanthropyDAILY GIVI…DONORS FUND INC: $2,800 · PhilanthropyDONORS FUN…KEREN HASHVIIS INC: $3,600 · ReligionOHR NAAVA: $216 · Religion+2 more: $36 · ReligionYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $2,748 · EducationSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $2,548 · Food & NutritionBonei Olam Inc: $1,019 · Human ServicesBOBBIES PLACE INC: $765 · Human Services+2 more: $36 · Human ServicesKAPAYIM INC: $72 · Health
Other$52,738Philanthropy$6,568Religion$3,852Education$2,748Food & Nutrition$2,548Human Services$1,820Health$72

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAILY GIVING INC: $3,768 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDONORS FUND INC: $2,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $2,748 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $2,548 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,019 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOBBIES PLACE INC: $765 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHR NAAVA: $216 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKAPAYIM INC: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC: $18 over 1y, 18% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTorahAnytimeCom Inc: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DAILY GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HASHVIIS INC ↗
  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOBBIES PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds OHR NAAVA ↗
  • Who funds KAPAYIM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MISASKIM CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY18× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Yisroel Aryeh and Leib Foundation · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · Mkz Charity Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Spitzer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Spitzer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Spitzer Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Spitzer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Spitzer’s filings →

More from the funding graph