Skip to content

· Private foundation

Spero Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$93k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$321kHealth$32kHuman Services$13kReligion$10kArts & Culture$4kYouth Development$3kFood & Nutrition$2kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $74k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$525k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARYMOUNT SCHOOL$27,850
YALU UNIVERSITY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$11,000
LEHIGH UNIVERSITY$10,000
ROWNEWYORKCOM$5,050
HAUPPAUGE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,500
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$2,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$2,500
ST VINCENT DE$1,000
VOICE HEALTH INSTITUTE$1,000
1X3 INC$1,000
RELIGIOUS OF THE SACRED HEART OF MARY$500
MSK GIVING$500
PAULIST FATHERS$500
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 27%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ANSLEYS ANGELS OF AMERICA: $100 → 10%A House on Beekman: $2k → 28%A House on Beekman: $500 → 28%A HOUSE ON BEEKMAN: $415 → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
VA
MD
TN
MS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$327k · 19 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
39

Total granted

$327k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+4%

Still filing today

32%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VH
    VOICE HEALTH INSTITUTE
    5× · 2017–2024 · $17k · revenue ×16
  • FU
    Fordham University
    7× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +47%
  • AH
    A HOUSE ON BEEKMAN INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $2k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • NY
    NEW YORK COMMON PANTRYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +38%
  • R
    ROWNEWYORKORG
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • WH
    WPY HOPEWELL FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
9
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
10
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
11
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University; the most unlike its peers is Reed Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARYMOUNT SCHOOL OF NYC: $181,789 · OtherMARYMOUNT SCHOOL OF NYCMARYMOUNT SCHOOL OF NEW YORK: $45,350 · OtherMARYMOUNT SCHOOL OF NEW YORKYALU UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · OtherYALU UNIVERSITYLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · Other+52 more: $71,657 · Other+52 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $16,000 · EducationFordham University: $10,100 · EducationVOICE HEALTH INSTITUTE: $16,800 · HealthSOLVING KIDS' CANCER INC: $5,672 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,500 · Health+3 more: $690 · HealthA HOUSE ON BEEKMAN INC: $2,460 · Human ServicesAINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICA: $100 · Human ServicesNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $2,250 · Food & NutritionReed Foundation Inc: $253 · PhilanthropyTUESDAY'S CHILDREN: $203 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$338,796Education$26,100Health$25,662Human Services$2,560Food & Nutrition$2,250Philanthropy$253Public Safety & Disaster$203

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVOICE HEALTH INSTITUTE: $16,800 over 5y, 14% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University: $10,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOLVING KIDS' CANCER INC: $5,672 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA HOUSE ON BEEKMAN INC: $2,460 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR LADY OF MOUNT CARMEL: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $440 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTUESDAY'S CHILDREN: $203 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL PROMISE INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUOGUE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANIEL'S MUSIC FOUNDATION: $27 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUOGUE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VOICE HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Fordham University ↗
  • Who funds SOLVING KIDS' CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds A HOUSE ON BEEKMAN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds OUR LADY OF MOUNT CARMEL ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Spero Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Spero Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Spero Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph