· Public charity
Spectroscopy Society of Pittsburgh
The SPECTROSCOPY SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH is organizaed to promote the increase in knowledge of spectroscopy, to promote the dissemination of such knowledge, and to promote the cooperation of workers in the field of spectroscopy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $93,878 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $205,902 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $112,024 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BROWN UNIVERSITY | $40,000 |
| MERCYHURST UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ST JOSEPH | $9,500 |
| CARNEGIE SCIENCE CENTER | $9,500 |
| CHATHAM UNIVERSITY | $9,490 |
| LANDMARK COLLEGE | $8,190 |
| FRANKLIN PIERCE UNIVERSITY | $7,198 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CICARNEGIE INSTITUTE5× · 2017–2025 · $91k · revenue +57%
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH5× · 2017–2024 · $89k · revenue +44%- WCWESTMINSTER COLLEGE2× · 2017–2020 · $45k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- TSTHE SOCIETY FOR ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS OF PITTSBURGHgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $58k · revenue +29%
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +39%- OUOhio Universityone grant, 2019 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…
The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.
Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.
Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muskingum University and the most unlike its peers is The Society for Analytical Chemists of Pittsburgh. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 80 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds THE SOCIETY FOR ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SETON HILL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WAYNESBURG UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAINT JOSEPH ↗
- Who funds LANDMARK COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CHATHAM UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH SECTION AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BIDWELL TRAINING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
- Who funds GETTYSBURG COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CARLOW UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GROVE CITY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THIEL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BETHEL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Norwich University ↗
- Who funds MONMOUTH COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ANDERSON UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds CEDAR CREST COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds FELICIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Council of Independent Colleges · Ibm International Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · The Society for Analytical Chemists of Pittsburgh · Folds of Honor Foundation · American Chemical Society · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Ernst & Young Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Spectroscopy Society of Pittsburgh funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Norwich University — 14% of income from government
- Landmark College Inc — 6% of income from government
- Notre Dame of Maryland University Inc — 1% of income from government
- University of Saint Joseph — 1% of income from government
- Mount Saint Mary's University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Spectroscopy Society of Pittsburgh?
Find your warmest path to Spectroscopy Society of Pittsburgh through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.