Skip to content

· Private foundation

Spartan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$360k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$2.9MHealth$2.2MHuman Services$1.3MPublic Benefit$573kRecreation & Sports$545kYouth Development$257kArts & Culture$205kPhilanthropy$155kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $167k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $820k
  • $250k+1 grant · $360k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEVELAND CLINIC$360,000
YMCA OF PARKERSBURG WV$170,196
Parkersburg Area Comm Foundation$120,709
WVU FOUNDATION$110,000
Memorial Health Foundation$104,000
Marietta College$101,731
CAMDEN CLARK MEDICAL CENTER$100,000
Uniontown Public Library$63,578
THE HILL SCHOOL$50,000
USGA$25,000
WEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY$25,000
GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION$20,000
United Way Alliance of the MOV$15,000
ELY CHAPMAN EDUCATION FOUNDATION$15,000
WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
OH
PA
NJ
KY
WV
VA
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 30 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
30

Total granted

$6.6M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+35%

Still filing today

37%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $865k · revenue +8%
  • MC
    Marietta College
    7× · 2019–2025 · $666k · revenue +28%
  • MH
    MARIETTA HEALTH FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $380k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2022 · $252k
  • BG
    Boys Girls Club of Parkersburg
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • CO
    City of Vienna Parks and Recreation
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waynesburg University

Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…

Education
2
Uvmc Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Philanthropy
3
Mcv Associated Physicians

The mission of the organization is to provide physicians and other healthcare professionals to support the needs of the community, as well as the academic mission of the vcu school of medicine.

Health
4
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
5
Medical College of Va Foundation

To support and foster vcu health and vcu health sciences through philanthropy, stewardship, innovation, communication, and collaboration.

Education
6
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
7
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
8
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
9
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
10
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
11
Wvu At Parkersburg Foundation Inc

To promote, encourage, and assist in the development and growth of west virginia university at parkersburg and to render services to its faculty, students, and alumni, and to the citizens of west virginia.

—
12
Park University

Park university's mission is to transform lives through accessible, student-centered, quality higher education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Vienna. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND CLINIC: $1,075,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINICYMCA OF PARKERSBURG WV: $892,164 · OtherYMCA OF PARKERSBURG WVParkersburg Area Comm Foundation: $354,385 · OtherParkersburg Area Comm FoundationUniontown Public Library: $343,457 · OtherUniontown Public LibraryYMCA: $251,691 · OtherBoys Girls Club of Parkersburg: $250,000 · OtherCity of Vienna Parks and Recreation: $250,000 · OtherCAMDEN CLARK MEDICAL CENTER: $225,000 · OtherKANAWHA COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $218,000 · OtherJohn Chambers College of B and E: $210,000 · OtherUSGA: $200,000 · Other+37 more: $1,691,655 · Other+37 moreWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $865,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSIT…Marietta College: $665,688 · EducationMarietta CollegeTHE HILL SCHOOL: $150,000 · EducationTHE HILL SCHOOL+4 more: $63,500 · EducationMARIETTA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $380,000 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE MOV INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureARTSBRIDGE INC: $52,250 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMARIETTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY ALLIANCE OF THE MID-OHIO VALLEY INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $34,250 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesBOYS CLUB OF PARKERSBURG INC: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF VIENNA: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$5,961,352Education$1,744,188Health$390,000Arts & Culture$162,250Philanthropy$159,250Human Services$50,000Youth Development$7,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $865,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMarietta College: $665,688 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMARIETTA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $380,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetTHE HILL SCHOOL: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PAKERSBURG WEST VIRGINIA: $114,758 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE MOV INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetMARIETTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetARTSBRIDGE INC: $52,250 over 2y, 16% of budgetCamden-Clark Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetUNITED WAY ALLIANCE OF THE MID-OHIO VALLEY INC: $50,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEly Chapman Education Foundation: $35,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $34,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE COLLEGE OF OHIO FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF PARKERSBURG INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetParkersburg Art Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetActors Guild of Parkersburg Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Marietta College ↗
  • Who funds MARIETTA HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PAKERSBURG WEST VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE MOV INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIETTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTSBRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Camden-Clark Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY ALLIANCE OF THE MID-OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Ely Chapman Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc)WV40.8× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc) · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Peoples Bank Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc · The Ross Foundation Inc · Deitzler Foundation Inc · The Virginia L Neptune Charitable Foundation · Bowles Rice Foundation · Marietta Community Foundation Inc · Oakland Foundation Inc · Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital Corporation · United Way Alliance of the Mid-Ohio Valley Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Spartan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Spartan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Spartan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Spartan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Spartan’s filings →

More from the funding graph