· Public charity
Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital Corporation
The mission of Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital is to meet the health care needs of our community for a lifetime.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $141,268 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $229,543 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $88,275 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $113k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| West Virginia University Foundation Inc | $16,000 |
| Wood County Junior Livestock Committee Inc - 4H & FFA Summer Showcase | $15,100 |
| Wood County Society Inc | $15,000 |
| Parkersburg Art Center Inc | $15,000 |
| Ritchie Co Youth Livestock Association | $11,800 |
| West Virginia University Parkersburg | $10,000 |
| Appalachian Partnership Inc | $10,000 |
| Washington State Community College Foundation | $10,000 |
| Childrens Museum of the MOV Inc | $10,000 |
| Downtown PKB Inc | $8,750 |
| Galley Enterprises Inc | $7,500 |
| Wirt County Fair Association | $6,618 |
| American Cancer Society | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WVWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC4× · 2019–2024 · $75k · revenue +8%
- WCWood County Society Inc3× · 2021–2024 · $35k · revenue +1%
- COChamber of Commerce of the MOV3× · 2018–2021 · $34k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- SRSUMMERSVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2018 · $147k · revenue -66%
- SOSoutheastern Ohio Port Authorityone grant, 2023 · $18k
- PWPARKERSBURG WOOD COUNTY AREA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +145%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the communitys health through the efficient provision, coordination, and integration of quality health services, health education, and research. To provide compassionate, quality health services according to the spiritual,…
To foster, support, and assist in any research and economic development activities consistent with the educational objectives and mission of west virginia state university.
The west virginia chamber of commerce provides opportunities for broad based prosperity throughout west virginia.
As the state's leading business advocate and resource, the ohio chamber of commerce aggressively champions free enterprise, economic competitiveness and growth for the benefit of all ohioans.
The huntington regional chamber of commerce will be the business advocate and actively facilitate the development and promotion of an attractive business climate and workforce in cabell and wayne counties.
The business council of westchester's mission is to work hard to grow the economy, create jobs and build a strong business community in westchester county.
To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.
The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…
All of the expenses of the cww are for the purpose of improving local government and administration through cooperative efforts. all services are provided to various communities in western wayne county, michigan.
The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.
To promote economic development, job creation, job retention, job training, workforce development, and the retention of current and recruitment of new business to ohio.
To offer a wide range of strategic partnerships, academia, employment and community opportunities to the state, while promoting innovation and critical thinking within our workforce. Our vision is to catalyze economic growth and improve…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc) and the most unlike its peers is Belpre Area Multi-Use Trail Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 61 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SUMMERSVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE MOV INC ↗
- Who funds WOOD COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds Wood County Society Inc ↗
- Who funds Chamber of Commerce of the MOV ↗
- Who funds Parkersburg Art Center Inc ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN PKB INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY ALLIANCE OF THE MID-OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Marietta Area Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds PARKERSBURG WOOD COUNTY AREA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds APPALACHIAN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds BUCKSKIN COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON STATE COLLEGE OF OHIO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Community Health Association ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE RECOVERY MANOR INC ↗
- Who funds PARKERSBURG AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC (PREVIOUSLY PACF INC) ↗
- Who funds OHIO COUNTY INDEPENDENT BARLOW IN ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER OF REGION V INC ↗
- Who funds BELPRE AREA MULTI-USE TRAIL PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BOYS CLUB OF PARKERSBURG INC ↗
- Who funds Marietta College ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc) · Peoples Bank Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc · Marietta Community Foundation Inc · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · The Virginia L Neptune Charitable Foundation · Spartan Foundation · Deitzler Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.