Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way Alliance of the Mid-Ohio Valley Inc

The mission of the united way alliance is to unite communities, contributors and human service agencies in a common goal to improve the quality of life in the greater mid-ohio valley.

$238k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$1.1MHealth$406kYouth Development$379kPublic Safety & Disaster$291kEmployment$191kHousing & Shelter$183kEducation$152kFood & Nutrition$138kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $229,056 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $237,897 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,841 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $196k
$15,417
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES WV$25,917
O'NEIL SENIOR CENTER$24,333
HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC$20,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PARKERSBURG$17,625
THE ARC OF THE MID OHIO VALLEY$17,375
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE MOV$17,292
CONSUMER CREDIT COUNCELING SERVICE OF THE MOV$15,500
NORTH STAR ADVOCACY CENTER$15,417
FAMILY CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER$15,300
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCITEY OF WV$14,542
WOOD COUNTY SOCIETY$12,833
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS CAP CITY$8,298
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$7,458
BELPRE AREA MINISTRIES$5,833
EVE INC$5,833
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $345k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WV: $26k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WV: $6k → 15%CARING CONNECTION: $26k → 15%CARING CONNECTION: $24k → 15%CARING CONNECTION: $21k → 15%CARING CONNECTION: $13k → 15%CARING CONNECTION: $12k → 15%CARING CONNECTION: $8k → 15%WASHINGTON CO HARVEST OF HOPE: $7k → 15%WASHINGTON COUNTY HARVEST OF HOPE: $7k → 15%WASHINGTON COUNTY HARVEST OF HOPE: $6k → 15%WASHINGTON CO HARVEST OF HOPE: $6k → 15%WASHINGTON CO HARVEST OF HOPE: $5k → 15%BELPRE AREA MINISTRIES: $8k → 15%BELPRE AREA MINISTRIES: $6k → 15%BELPRE AREA MINISTRIES: $6k → 15%BELPRE AREA MINISTRIES: $6k → 15%COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $15k → 19%BELPRE AREA MINISTRIES: $6k → 15%BELPRE AREA MINISTRIES: $5k → 15%ARTHUR GUSTKE SHELTER FOR YOUTH: $13k → 19%COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $12k → 19%COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $12k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $11k → 19%ARTHUR GUSTKE SHELTER FOR YOUTH: $10k → 19%COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $10k → 19%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WV: $10k → 19%ARTHUR GUSTKE SHELTER FOR YOUTHCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $10k → 19%COMMUNITY RESOURCESINC: $9k → 19%PARKERSBURG AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $7k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WV: $6k → 19%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $6k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $6k → 19%PARKERSBURG AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $6k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 35 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
19

Total granted

$2.7M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+53%

Still filing today

80%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthEmploymentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    O'NEILL SENIOR CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $229k · revenue +12%
  • SR
    SW RESOURCES INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $184k · revenue +192%
  • EI
    EVE INCORPORATED
    8× · 2018–2025 · $157k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • MA
    MOUNTAINEER AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $28k · revenue +96%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS ALLOHAK COUNCIL
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • BC
    BELPRE CITY SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
2
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
3
Chances & Changes Inc

To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.

—
4
Westside Community Action Council

Provide service to assist individuals and families with food utility assistance and collaborate with other community agencies.

Community Improvement
5
Volunteers of America Western Washington

We serve and empower individuals, families, and communities. we respond to over 200,000 comprehensive human service requests for assistance each year in the following service areas: basic needs, community information & referral,…

—
6
Anderson County Community Action Inc

The Anderson County Community Action Commission provides food, clothing, household foods, and essential assistance to low-income residents of Anderson County, Tennessee. The organization operates a community food pantry, clothing closet,…

—
7
Ywca of Northwest Ohio

The ywca of northwest ohio strives to be a powerful proactive force for the support and advancement of women and girls in our community that will continue to work for peace, justice, equality, and dignity for all people.

Human Services
8
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
9
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
10
West Central Missouri Community Action Agency

West central helps people and communities reach their fullest potential by cultivating and coordinating resources, building partnerships, and advocating for change.

—
11
Volunteers of America of Western New York Inc

Enable people in the community to break the cycle of poverty and reach their full potential by encouraging positive development and promoting self-sufficiency as further described in part iii, line 4.

—
12
Payne County Youth Services Inc

Payne County Youth Services, Inc. is dedicated to providing free quality services for the positive development and recovery of children, youth, and families.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Program Corporation of Washington-Morgan Counties Ohio and the most unlike its peers is Hope House Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Support ServicesYouth Development Organizat…School & Youth Activity Boo…Community Service Organizat…Mid-Ohio Valley Community O…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%0%<5yr12%6%5–10yr18%21%10–20yr14%12%20–35yr18%21%35–55yr22%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr12%1%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr14%11%20–35yr18%32%35–55yr22%47%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/45
the rest of the field
9%
81/870

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
30/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN RED CROSS — $284,298 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSO'NEILL SENIOR CENTER INC — $228,725 · OtherO'NEILL SENIOR CENTER INCEVE INCORPORATED — $156,661 · OtherEVE INCORPORATEDMID-OHIO VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC — $127,795 · OtherMID-OHIO VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INCTHE FAMILY CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER OF REGION V INC — $120,143 · OtherTHE FAMILY CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER OF REGION V INCCONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING OF THE MID-OHIO VALLEY — $110,630 · OtherCONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING OF THE MID-OHIO VALLEYThe Arc of the Mid Ohio Valley Inc — $98,123 · OtherThe Arc of the Mid Ohio Valley IncYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PAKERSBURG WEST VIRGINIA — $82,083 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE MOV — $70,792 · OtherNORTH STAR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $68,599 · OtherMID OHIO VALLEY HEALTH DEPT — $64,071 · Other+26 more — $295,058 · Other+26 moreCARING CONNECTION INC — $103,353 · Human ServicesCARING CONNECTI…THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $80,247 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S …COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC — $63,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY RESOU…CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC — $55,284 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARIT…BELPRE AREA MINISTRIES INC — $36,397 · Human ServicesBELPRE AREA MIN…WASHINGTON COUNTY HARVEST OF HOPE — $30,629 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON COUN…PARKERSBURG AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $13,204 · Human ServicesBOYS CLUB OF PARKERSBURG INC — $146,941 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS CLUB OF…BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $97,840 · Youth DevelopmentBOY SCOUTS O…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PLEASANTS CO — $40,240 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIR…THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON CO — $25,499 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS AND…WOOD COUNTY 4 H LEADERS — $12,579 · Youth DevelopmentSW RESOURCES INC — $183,697 · EmploymentWood County Society Inc — $130,512 · HealthHOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC — $20,000 · HealthEly Chapman Education Foundation — $67,604 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $16,208 · EducationWOOD COUNTY PERMANENT 4-H CAMP ASSOCIATION — $7,500 · EducationTHE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC — $30,750 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,706,978Human Services$382,114Youth Development$323,099Employment$183,697Health$150,512Education$91,312Housing & Shelter$30,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetO'NEILL SENIOR CENTER INC — $228,725 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetSW RESOURCES INC — $183,697 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetEVE INCORPORATED — $156,661 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF PARKERSBURG INC — $146,941 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetWood County Society Inc — $130,512 over 9y, 12% of budgetMID-OHIO VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC — $127,795 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER OF REGION V INC — $120,143 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetCONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING OF THE MID-OHIO VALLEY — $110,630 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetCARING CONNECTION INC — $103,353 over 6y, 45% of budgetThe Arc of the Mid Ohio Valley Inc — $98,123 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $97,840 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PAKERSBURG WEST VIRGINIA — $82,083 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $80,247 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE MOV — $70,792 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetNORTH STAR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $68,599 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetEly Chapman Education Foundation — $67,604 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCES INC — $63,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC — $55,284 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON-MORGAN COUNTIES OHIO — $41,450 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PLEASANTS CO — $40,240 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetMARIETTA FAMILY YMCA — $36,432 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetBELPRE AREA MINISTRIES INC — $36,397 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetTHE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC — $30,750 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY HARVEST OF HOPE — $30,629 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetMOUNTAINEER AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC — $27,837 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON CO — $25,499 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGoPacks — $17,750 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $16,208 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOOD COUNTY PERMANENT 4-H CAMP ASSOCIATION — $7,500 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetBETSEY MILLS CORPORATION — $6,698 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Parkersburg Area Comm…Sisters of St Joseph …Peoples Bank Foundati…Bernard McDonough Fou…Marietta Community Fo…Deitzler Foundation I…United Way of Washing…Henry Logan Children'…Fenton Foundation IncWest Virginia First F…Oakland Foundation IncEncova Foundation of …
Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc)WV69.5× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc) · Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc · Peoples Bank Foundation · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Marietta Community Foundation Inc · Deitzler Foundation Inc · United Way of Washington County · Henry Logan Children's Home Inc · Fenton Foundation Inc · West Virginia First Foundation Inc · Oakland Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way Alliance of the Mid-Ohio Valley Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home