Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sowing Circle

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$623k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$267k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$6.5MHuman Services$406kInternational$57kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $98k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $267k
$7,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Blue Letter Bible$267,000
Reverence Bible Church$200,449
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Enduring Word$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Understand the Times$15,960
Safe Harbor International$12,000
Hope For Today$7,500
Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa$7,200
U-Turn for Christ$7,000
The Life Network$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Pastoral Training of Asia$5,000
Wycliff Bible Translators$4,500
Young Life Abi Hoc$4,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Piedmont Women's Center: $4k → 10%Miracle Hill Ministries: $4k → 10%Miracle Hill Ministries: $2k → 10%Piedmont Women's Center: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
IA
IN
PA
CA
AZ
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.0M · 18 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
11

Total granted

$7.0M
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+27%

Still filing today

44%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BL
    BLUE LETTER BIBLE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.9M · revenue +212% · 48% of their budget
  • R2
    RUN 2 RESCUE
    4× · 2019–2022 · $400k · revenue +31% · 25% of their budget
  • EW
    Enduring Word
    8× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +822%

Funded once

  • CF
    Catalyst for Harmonygraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +27%
  • FR
    Far Reaching Ministries
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +4%
  • TL
    Training Leaders International
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
3
Tyndale Bible Translators

Bible Translation and acts of Christian Services

Religion
4
Tim Robnett Ministries Dba ETeamGlobal

To Identify, Affirm, Train, and Mobilize Ephesians 4 evangelists to equip the church for evangelism.

Religion
5
Frontlines Ministries

Connecting biblical soul care to missions through the local church.

Religion
6
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
7
Uncharted Ministries

Uncharted ministries informs, inspires and challenges the christian church to serve the people of the middle east and in uncharted lands.

Religion
8
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
9
Challenge Ministries Us

The organization exists to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ while providing support and serving the poor through benevolent assistance, medical services, education, orphan care, church planting, etc.

International
10
Ambassadors for Christ International - Usa Inc

Ambassadors for Christ International - USA is a fellowship of gospel preachers and teachers whose mission is to preach Christ, edify the Church, and to glorify God and serve as a catalyst for revival, evangelism, and training of Christians…

Religion
11
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
12
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miracle Hill Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Fellowship of Christians & Jews Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLUE LETTER BIBLE: $4,908,552 · OtherBLUE LETTER BIBLEREVERENCE BIBLE CHURCH INC: $652,949 · OtherREVERENCE BIBLE CHURCH INCCALVARY CHAPEL OF IRVINE: $264,168 · Other+21 more: $569,378 · Other+21 moreRUN 2 RESCUE: $400,000 · Human Services+2 more: $12,000 · Human ServicesEnduring Word: $200,000 · ReligionCatalyst for Harmony: $20,000 · Religion+3 more: $12,000 · ReligionSafe Harbor International Relief: $41,175 · InternationalFar Reaching Ministries: $20,000 · InternationalGO Ministries Inc: $3,000 · International
Other$6,395,047Human Services$412,000Religion$232,000International$64,175

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLUE LETTER BIBLE: $4,908,552 over 8y, 48% of budgetRUN 2 RESCUE: $400,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetEnduring Word: $200,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetUNDERSTAND THE TIMES INC: $129,220 over 8y, 12% of budgetSafe Harbor International Relief: $41,175 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetFar Reaching Ministries: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPIEDMONT WOMEN'S CENTER: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTraining Leaders International: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOpen Air Campaigners US Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLUE LETTER BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds RUN 2 RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Enduring Word ↗
  • Who funds UNDERSTAND THE TIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds Safe Harbor International Relief ↗
  • Who funds Catalyst for Harmony ↗
  • Who funds Far Reaching Ministries ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds Training Leaders International ↗
  • Who funds MIO Frontiers ↗
  • Who funds GO Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Open Air Campaigners US Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA13.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sowing Circle funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sowing Circle. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sowing Circle?

    Find your warmest path to Sowing Circle through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sowing Circle’s filings →

    More from the funding graph