Skip to content

· Private foundation

Southwestern Urban Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$31k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$75kYouth Development$32kCivil Rights$25kArts & Culture$13kHuman Services$11kCrime & Legal$5kCommunity Improvement$4kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Dragonfly Home$5,000
Langston University Foundation$5,000
Millwood School District Enrichment Foundation$3,000
Community Development Corp$3,000
Beyond the Spectrum$2,500
Young Achievers Christian Academy$2,000
Freedom Center of Oklahoma City LLC$2,000
Legacy Learning$1,000
Ada Lois Sipuel Fisher Chapter of the Black Law Students$1,000
Marcella Guthrie Scholarship Board$1,000
The Howard University$1,000
Metro Technology Foundation$1,000
Oklahoma Humanities$1,000
Classen SAS School at NE$500
Hope for the Future$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Hope for the Future inc: $3k → 16%Hope for the Future: $3k → 16%Hope for the Future: $500 → 16%Hope for the Future: $200 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$106k · 20 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
29

Total granted

$106k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
0%

Still filing today

40%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEmploymentPublic BenefitHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LANGSTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $16k · revenue +13%
  • ME
    MILLWOOD ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +593%
  • HF
    Hope For The Future Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $6k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • OU
    Oklahoma University Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • AC
    Ambassadors Children & Youth Choir
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • NA
    National Assoc of Blacks in Criminal Justice-Oklahoma Chapter
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Diversity Center of Oklahoma Inc
Health
2
Oklahoma Achieves Inc

To engage business leaders in the development of education policies that will match our K-12 education system to the needs of tomorrow's workforce.

—
3
Okmulgee Area Development Corp

Economic development in okmulgee county

Community Improvement
4
The Verge Entrepreneurship Hub Foundation
Community Improvement
5
Ok Rhythmic Empire Inc
Youth Development
6
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
7
University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma Foundation Inc

The purpose of the USAO Foundation is to support the mission of the University of Science & Arts of Oklahoma.

Education
8
Oklahoma Decides Inc

Education and issue advocacy related to helping Oklahomans understand their Constitutional right to decide issues for themselves at the ballot box.

—
9
Oklahoma Association of Community Colleges Inc

The Oklahoma Association of Community Colleges provides leadership and advocacy to advance the function, purpose, and values of community college education.

Education
10
Oklahoma Contemporary Arts Center Inc

Oklahoma contemporary arts center encourages artistic expression in all its forms through education,exhibitions, and performance.

Arts & Culture
11
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
12
Booker T Washington Foundation

It is to enhance all aspects of academic endeavors for the students, faculty, and administration at booker t washington high school in tulsa oklahoma

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Humanities Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Black Liberated Arts Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FREEDOM CENTER OF OKC LLC: $24,500 · OtherTHE FREEDOM CENTER OF OKC LLCMILLWOOD ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION: $13,000 · OtherMILLWOOD ENRICHMENT FOUNDATIONBeyond the Spectrum: $8,000 · OtherBeyond the SpectrumIndividual grant recipient: $5,700 · OtherOklahoma University Foundation: $5,300 · OtherAmbassadors Children & Youth Choir: $5,000 · OtherNational Assoc of Blacks in Criminal Justice-Oklahoma Chapter (NABCJ): $5,000 · OtherMillwood School District Enrichment: $5,000 · OtherAda Lois Sipuel Fisher Chair at OU: $5,000 · OtherThe Dragonfly Home Inc: $5,000 · Other+34 more: $60,000 · Other+34 moreLANGSTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $16,000 · EducationLANGSTON U…THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationTHE HOWARD…Black Liberated Arts Center Inc: $2,500 · Arts & CultureOklahoma Humanities Council Inc: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHICK DESCRIPTION INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureTHE AMBASSADORS CONCERT CHOIR INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureHope For The Future Inc: $5,700 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER: $3,500 · EmploymentCut it Forward Inc: $2,500 · Public BenefitEASTSIDE PRIDE WRESTLING CLUB: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$141,500Education$17,000Arts & Culture$7,500Human Services$5,700Employment$3,500Public Benefit$2,500Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FREEDOM CENTER OF OKC LLC: $24,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLANGSTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMILLWOOD ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetHope For The Future Inc: $5,700 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetThe Dragonfly Home Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBlack Liberated Arts Center Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetOklahoma Humanities Council Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMBASSADORS CONCERT CHOIR INC: $1,500 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLASS MATTERS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FREEDOM CENTER OF OKC LLC ↗
  • Who funds LANGSTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MILLWOOD ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Hope For The Future Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Dragonfly Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Black Liberated Arts Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Cut it Forward Inc ↗
  • Who funds EASTSIDE PRIDE WRESTLING CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Humanities Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds THICK DESCRIPTION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMBASSADORS CONCERT CHOIR INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK31.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southwestern Urban Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southwestern Urban Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 91%
  • Oklahoma Humanities Council Inc: 91% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Southwestern Urban Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Southwestern Urban Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Southwestern Urban’s filings →

More from the funding graph