Skip to content

· Public charity

Southwest Members Care Incorporated

The accumulation of funds through a utility round-up program to be disbursed for charitable purposes within the Southwest Tennessee area.

$222k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$193kHuman Services$107kFood & Nutrition$84kEducation$76kReligion$68kYouth Development$66kRecreation & Sports$30kCommunity Improvement$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $134,914, the rows itemized in this filing. The $222,370 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $87,456 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $61k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$47k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BoysGirls Club Hatchie River Region$10,500
Confidential Care Mobile Ministry$10,000
Chester County 4-H$10,000
Second Harvest Food Bank$10,000
RIFA$10,000
Woodland Baptist Church Brotherhood Ramp Builders$10,000
Exchange Club Carl Perkins$9,114
Beech Bluff Recreational Center$9,000
Birth Choice$8,600
Scarlet Rope Project$8,000
The Fostered Gift$8,000
Holly Grove Cumberland Presbyterian Church$7,500
Henderson Community Soup Kitchen$7,060
Friends of Tipton County Library$6,000
Haywood County 4-H$5,640
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%EXCHANGE CLUB CARL PERKINS -LAUDERD: $8k → 20%HENDERSON CO HOMELESS COALITION: $7k → 17%EXCHANGE CLUB CARL PERKINS -CHESTER: $8k → 15%SCARLET ROPE PROJECT: $10k → 15%Scarlet Rope Project: $8k → 15%TIPTON CO COMM ON AGING: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$496k · 24 repeat orgs$257k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
30

Total granted

$496k
$234k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+41%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE TN INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $27k · revenue +17%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE HATCHIE RIVER
    2× · 2023–2025 · $18k · revenue +26%
  • CC
    CHESTER COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CENT
    2× · 2022–2025 · $11k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • VH
    VISION HAYWOOD COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue ×21
  • MH
    MADISON HALL HEALTH CLINIC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • BF
    BRIGHTON FIRE DEPT
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Resource Center of Robertson County
Human Services
2
Townsend Area Volunteer Fire D

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Talladega County Child Advocacy Center Inc

Interview facility for child abuse victims.

Human Services
4
Anderson County Community Action Inc

The Anderson County Community Action Commission provides food, clothing, household foods, and essential assistance to low-income residents of Anderson County, Tennessee. The organization operates a community food pantry, clothing closet,…

—
5
Hickman County Historical Society

To Preserve and teach Local Hictory

—
6
Catons Chapel Richardson Cove Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Provides fire protection for all of Sevier County, Tennessee and more specifically, the Catons Chapel and Richardson Cove areas of unincorporated Sevier County, Tennessee.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Spay It Forward Cannon County
Animals
8
Hendersonville Chamber of Commerce

To unite business and community leaders to develop and promote hendersonville, tn.

—
9
Buckingham County Vol Fire Department Dba Dillwyn Fire Department

The purpose of the Buckingham County Vol. Fire Dept. is to provide fire protection to the citizens of Buckingham County and surrounding counties if needed. We also respond to automobile accidents as well as any other request for assistance.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Casa of Northeast Tennessee

Advocate for the best interest of abused and neglected children with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Crime & Legal
11
Cannon County Rescue Squad

Public charity rescue squad

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Blount County Youth Court Inc

Tennessee Youth Court (TYC) is a teen-driven juvenile delinquency prevention/intervention diversion program based on restorative justice.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tennessee 4-H Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Casa of Tipton County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
9/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHESTER COUNTY GOVERNMENT DBA CHESTER COUNTY SOLID WASTE & WEST TN RECYCLIN: $40,757 · OtherCHESTER COUNTY GOVERNMENT DBA CHESTER COUNTY SOLID WASTE & WEST TN RECYCLINWOODLAND BAPTIST CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherWOODLAND BAPTIST CHURCHREGIONAL INTER-FAITH ASSOCIATION INC: $31,000 · OtherHAYWOOD COUNTY DISTRICT 2 VOLUNTEER: $25,463 · OtherBROWNSVILLEHAYWOOD CO FIRE DEPT: $24,067 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $23,000 · OtherMUMFORD FIRE DEPARTMENT: $21,384 · Other+40 more: $406,408 · Other+40 moreExchange Club - Carl Perkins Center for the Prevention of Child Abuse Inc: $24,662 · Human ServicesSCARLET ROPE PROJECT: $18,000 · Human ServicesTipton County Commission On Aging: $7,500 · Human ServicesHENDERSON COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION: $7,000 · Human ServicesSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE TN INC: $27,000 · Food & NutritionBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE HATCHIE RIVER: $18,254 · Youth DevelopmentCONFIDENTIAL CARE MOBILE MINISTRY: $15,300 · Civil RightsMunford High School Boosters Inc: $6,802 · EducationGOVERNOR'S EARLY LITERACY FOUNDATION: $6,172 · EducationVISION HAYWOOD COUNTY: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$612,079Human Services$57,162Food & Nutrition$27,000Youth Development$18,254Civil Rights$15,300Education$12,974Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE TN INC: $27,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetExchange Club - Carl Perkins Center for the Prevention of Child Abuse Inc: $24,662 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE HATCHIE RIVER: $18,254 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSCARLET ROPE PROJECT: $18,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetGOLDEN AGE SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $15,660 over 2y, 12% of budgetCONFIDENTIAL CARE MOBILE MINISTRY: $15,300 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTENNESSEE 4-H FOUNDATION INC: $11,690 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CENT: $11,400 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetVISION HAYWOOD COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCASA OF TIPTON COUNTY: $9,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetBIRTH CHOICE INC: $8,600 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTipton County Commission On Aging: $7,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetMunford High School Boosters Inc: $6,802 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetGOVERNOR'S EARLY LITERACY FOUNDATION: $6,172 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChester County Chamber of Commerce: $5,780 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE TN INC ↗
  • Who funds Exchange Club - Carl Perkins Center for the Prevention of Child Abuse Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE HATCHIE RIVER ↗
  • Who funds SCARLET ROPE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN AGE SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CONFIDENTIAL CARE MOBILE MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE 4-H FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESTER COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CENT ↗
  • Who funds VISION HAYWOOD COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MASON FIRE AUXILIARY INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF TIPTON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BIRTH CHOICE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ford PhilanthropyMI16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ford Philanthropy · James E Campbell Family Foundation 26-3889180 · West Tn Healthcare Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · The Murray Foundation Inc · United Way of West Tennesseinc Starks · Delta Dental of Tennessee Inc · Robinson Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southwest Members Care Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southwest Members Care Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Southwest Members Care Incorporated?

    Find your warmest path to Southwest Members Care Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Southwest Members Care’s filings →

    More from the funding graph