Skip to content
Southland Park Community Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Southland Park Community Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$101
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$101
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$21kHealth$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kArts & Culture$6kHuman Services$6kYouth Development$6kRecreation & Sports$4kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$101
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$101
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%Page Robbins Adult Day Center: $300 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$31k · 17 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
46

Total granted

$31k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+41%

Still filing today

47%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    West Memphis Animal Shelter
    3× · 2018–2021 · $3k
  • HC
    HOMETOWN CRAWFORDSVILLE
    2× · 2017–2019 · $3k
  • KC
    KIWANIS CLUB OF MEMPHIS
    3× · 2018–2021 · $3k · revenue -39%

Funded once

  • CC
    Crittenden County Sheriff's Department
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AC
    ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AUXILIARYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +29%
  • WL
    Woolfolk Library
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arkansas Family Alliance F/K/a Whitsonlife Inc

Ministry for child welfare and families in crisis.

Religion
2
Boys & Girls Club of Southwest Alabama Inc

The boys and girls club of southwest alabama actively works with local youth of all backgrounds to develop the qualities needed to become responsible citizens and future leaders in our community.

Youth Development
3
Lee County Youth Development Center

A place for change...working together, offering rays of hope for children and families...strengthening our community.

Crime & Legal
4
Eabc Kids Child Development Center

To provde families in the area a caring, christian based daycare for their young children

Human Services
5
Pip Ched-Roc Inc

Community center which also serves as a boys and girls club in cross county ar

Recreation & Sports
6
Northwest Al Mental Health Center

Community mental health center

Health
7
Economic Development Center of Washington County Inc

To promote and assist in economic development, job creation and job training for washington county, ms and surrounding areas. to promote and assist existing businesses in the area.

Community Improvement
8
Creekside Christian Academy

Childcare/education services

Education
9
Little River Learning Center Fdn

Day care facility, preschool facility and after-school program for children who live in or whose parents work in the greater little river, kansas community to enable their parents or guardians to be gainfully employed.

Human Services
10
St Louis Center

Serving individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in an intentional, faith-based community.

—
11
Children's Foundation of Memphis
Health
12
M and M Family Care Center Inc

To provide childcare

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-South Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Frank C Steudlein Learning Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Crittenden County Sheriff's Department: $10,000 · OtherCrittenden County Sheriff's DepartmentWoolfolk Library: $5,000 · OtherWoolfolk LibraryWest Memphis Animal Shelter: $3,250 · OtherHOMETOWN CRAWFORDSVILLE: $3,000 · OtherEarle Alumni Cardinal Club: $3,000 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB OF MEMPHIS: $2,950 · OtherRed Wolves Foundation: $2,750 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC 558 CHICKASAW COUNCIL: $2,500 · OtherSPEECH & HEARING CENTER OF THE MIDSOUTH DBA MEMPHIS ORAL SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF: $2,500 · Other+45 more: $32,926 · Other+45 moreARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AUXILIARY: $5,000 · PhilanthropyFRANK C STEUDLEIN LEARNING CENTER: $2,000 · EducationWEST MEMPHIS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $1,500 · EducationTHE PEER POWER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EducationSOULSVILLE FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Arts & CultureMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK: $1,000 · Food & NutritionHOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $1,000 · ReligionHOPE HOUSE: $500 · Human ServicesPAGE ROBBINS ADULT DAY SERVICES INC: $300 · Human ServicesALCY BALL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $300 · Housing & Shelter
Other$67,876Philanthropy$5,000Education$4,500Arts & Culture$3,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Religion$1,000Human Services$800Housing & Shelter$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AUXILIARY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOULSVILLE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF MEMPHIS: $2,950 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC 558 CHICKASAW COUNCIL: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPEECH & HEARING CENTER OF THE MIDSOUTH DBA MEMPHIS ORAL SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRANK C STEUDLEIN LEARNING CENTER: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTER OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDELTAARTS INC: $1,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWEST MEMPHIS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PEER POWER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHOPE HOUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHEAST ARKANSAS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAGE ROBBINS ADULT DAY SERVICES INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALCY BALL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARKANSAS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AUXILIARY ↗
  • Who funds SOULSVILLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIWANIS CLUB OF MEMPHIS ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC 558 CHICKASAW COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SPEECH & HEARING CENTER OF THE MIDSOUTH DBA MEMPHIS ORAL SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF ↗
  • Who funds FRANK C STEUDLEIN LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTER OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds DELTAARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST MEMPHIS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE PEER POWER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds MID-SOUTH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Greyhound Ow…Christian Community F…United Way of the Mid…Community Foundation …The Pfizer Foundation…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Arkansas Greyhound Owners and Breeders AssociationAR17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Greyhound Owners and Breeders Association · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · United Way of the Mid South · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southland Park Community Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southland Park Community Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Southland Park Community Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Southland Park Community Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Southland Park’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home