Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Southland Park Community Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$101
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$101
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Education$21kHealth$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kArts & Culture$6kHuman Services$6kYouth Development$6kRecreation & Sports$4kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$101
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$101
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%Page Robbins Adult Day Center: $300 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$31k · 17 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
46

Total granted

$31k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+41%

Still filing today

47%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureFood & NutritionReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    West Memphis Animal Shelter
    3× · 2018–2021 · $3k
  • HC
    HOMETOWN CRAWFORDSVILLE
    2× · 2017–2019 · $3k
  • KC
    KIWANIS CLUB OF MEMPHIS
    3× · 2018–2021 · $3k · revenue -31%

Funded once

  • CC
    Crittenden County Sheriff's Department
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AC
    ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AUXILIARYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +29%
  • WL
    Woolfolk Library
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arkansas Family Alliance F/K/a Whitsonlife Inc

Ministry for child welfare and families in crisis.

Religion
2
Boys & Girls Club of Southwest Alabama Inc

The boys and girls club of southwest alabama actively works with local youth of all backgrounds to develop the qualities needed to become responsible citizens and future leaders in our community.

Youth Development
3
Lee County Youth Development Center

A place for change...working together, offering rays of hope for children and families...strengthening our community.

Crime & Legal
4
Eabc Kids Child Development Center

To provde families in the area a caring, christian based daycare for their young children

Human Services
5
Pip Ched-Roc Inc

Community center which also serves as a boys and girls club in cross county ar

Recreation & Sports
6
Northwest Al Mental Health Center

Community mental health center

Health
7
Economic Development Center of Washington County Inc

To promote and assist in economic development, job creation and job training for washington county, ms and surrounding areas. to promote and assist existing businesses in the area.

Community Improvement
8
Creekside Christian Academy

Childcare/education services

Education
9
Little River Learning Center Fdn

Day care facility, preschool facility and after-school program for children who live in or whose parents work in the greater little river, kansas community to enable their parents or guardians to be gainfully employed.

Human Services
10
St Louis Center

Serving individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in an intentional, faith-based community.

11
Children's Foundation of Memphis
Health
12
M and M Family Care Center Inc

To provide childcare

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-South Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Frank C Steudlein Learning Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Crittenden County Sheriff's Department — $10,000 · OtherCrittenden County Sheriff's DepartmentWoolfolk Library — $5,000 · OtherWoolfolk LibraryWest Memphis Animal Shelter — $3,250 · OtherHOMETOWN CRAWFORDSVILLE — $3,000 · OtherEarle Alumni Cardinal Club — $3,000 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB OF MEMPHIS — $2,950 · OtherRed Wolves Foundation — $2,750 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC 558 CHICKASAW COUNCIL — $2,500 · OtherSPEECH & HEARING CENTER OF THE MIDSOUTH DBA MEMPHIS ORAL SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF — $2,500 · Other+45 more — $32,926 · Other+45 moreARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AUXILIARY — $5,000 · PhilanthropyFRANK C STEUDLEIN LEARNING CENTER — $2,000 · EducationWEST MEMPHIS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $1,500 · EducationTHE PEER POWER FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · EducationSOULSVILLE FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Arts & CultureHOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES — $1,000 · ReligionMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK — $1,000 · Food & NutritionHOPE HOUSE — $500 · Human ServicesPAGE ROBBINS ADULT DAY SERVICES INC — $300 · Human ServicesALCY BALL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $300 · Housing & Shelter
Other$67,876Philanthropy$5,000Education$4,500Arts & Culture$3,000Religion$1,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Human Services$800Housing & Shelter$300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AUXILIARY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOULSVILLE FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF MEMPHIS — $2,950 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC 558 CHICKASAW COUNCIL — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPEECH & HEARING CENTER OF THE MIDSOUTH DBA MEMPHIS ORAL SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTER OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRANK C STEUDLEIN LEARNING CENTER — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDELTAARTS INC — $1,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWEST MEMPHIS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PEER POWER FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMARION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHEAST ARKANSAS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE HOUSE — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPAGE ROBBINS ADULT DAY SERVICES INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALCY BALL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARKANSAS INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AUXILIARY
  • Who funds SOULSVILLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KIWANIS CLUB OF MEMPHIS
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC 558 CHICKASAW COUNCIL
  • Who funds SPEECH & HEARING CENTER OF THE MIDSOUTH DBA MEMPHIS ORAL SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTER OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS INC
  • Who funds FRANK C STEUDLEIN LEARNING CENTER
  • Who funds DELTAARTS INC
  • Who funds WEST MEMPHIS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds THE PEER POWER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES
  • Who funds MARION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds MID-SOUTH FOOD BANK
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHEAST ARKANSAS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Greyhound Owners and Breeders AssociationAR17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Greyhound Owners and Breeders Association · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · United Way of the Mid South · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Southland Park Community Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Southland Park Community Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Southland Park Community Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph