Skip to content

· Public charity

Southern Region Emergency Medical Services Council Inc

Sremsc is a devoted team working for all the people of ems, helping them provide the best in patient care, integrating them into the health care team, and ensuring their commitment and value are recognized.

$127k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$740kHuman Services$390kHealth$287kCommunity Improvement$138kPublic Benefit$93kEnvironment$8k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $117,302, the rows itemized in this filing. The $126,887 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,585 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $103k
$14,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNALASKA FIRE DEPARTMENT$31,318
KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH$29,245
GIRDWOOD FIRE DEPARTMENT$15,000
CENTRAL ES$14,000
CORDOVA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$13,070
SELDOVIA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$8,631
CHIGNIK LAGOON VILLAGE COUNCIL$6,038
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $376k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $40k → 8%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $39k → 8%CHUGACHMIUT INC: $50k → 10%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $39k → 8%CHUGACHMIUT INC: $50k → 10%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $39k → 8%CHUGACHMIUT INC: $46k → 10%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $39k → 8%CHUGACHMIUT INC: $33k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 10 repeat orgs$239k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$1.4M
$165k

Still filing today

70%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
HealthHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation
    5× · 2017–2024 · $287k · revenue +152%
  • CR
    COPPER RIVER EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $267k · revenue +145% · 62% of their budget
  • KA
    Kodiak Area Native Association
    5× · 2017–2021 · $197k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • NV
    Native Village of Kanatak
    one grant, 2020 · $83k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $28k
  • NI
    NANWALEK IRA COUNCIL
    one grant, 2021 · $19k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Police & Fire Chaplains

Offer assistance for emergency personnel.

—
2
Southeast Region Emergency Medical Services Council Inc

To ensure the best possible emergency health care throughout southeast alaska

Health
3
Emergency Medical Services at the University of Washington
Health
4
Maine Emergency Squad Inc

Our mission is to provide exceptional Advanced Life Support and medical care to our communities in Upstate New York. As a proud 501(c)3 non-profit organization, we serve the Town of Maine, Town of Nanticoke, the Village and Town of Newark…

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Central Aroostook County Emergency Medical Services Authority

Emergency ambulance services for 911 response. We primarily serve the three adjacent communities of Mars Hill Blaine and Bridgewater Maine and the unorganized townships nearby.

—
6
Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Association Educational Foundation Inc
Environment
7
Alaska Mountain Rescue Group

To finding and doing basic medical to people lost or have perished in the wilderness. Our goal is to bring people home safely!

—
8
Interior Region Ems Council Inc

To provide and facilitate appropriate and sustainable training for erm providers and the public in the region; to promote research and data collection relevant to em; to provide appropriate and sustainable equipment for ems providers and…

Health
9
Skaneateles Ambulance

Providers of volunteer medical services and related training to the community of skaneateles and the surrounding areas. this organization has been providing life support services to the community for over 45 years.

—
10
Yadkin County Rescue Squad and Emergency Medical Services Inc

Rescue and emergency medical services provided to the residents of yadkin county.

Health
11
Anawalt Volunteer Fire Dept Inc
Public Safety & Disaster
12
Thompson Falls Ambulance

Rural Ambulance Service

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cooper Landing Emergency Services; the most unlike its peers is Ninilchik Emergency Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation: $287,210 · HealthBristol Bay Area Health CorporationCOPPER RIVER EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $267,438 · HealthCOPPER RIVER EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVIC…KENAI PENINSULA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $129,540 · OtherKENAI PENINSULA SCHOOL DISTRICTKENAI PENINSULA EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $92,120 · OtherKENAI PENINSULA EMERGENCY SERVICE…Native Village of Kanatak: $83,174 · OtherNative Village of KanatakUNALASKA FIRE DEPARTMENT: $31,318 · OtherUNALASKA FIRE DEPARTMENTNINILCHIK EMERGENCY SERVICES: $27,959 · OtherNINILCHIK EMERGENCY SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $27,611 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNANWALEK IRA COUNCIL: $19,400 · Other+9 more: $73,843 · Other+9 moreKodiak Area Native Association: $196,835 · Human ServicesKodiak Area Native Associ…CHUGACHMIUT: $179,017 · Human ServicesCHUGACHMIUTALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC: $138,086 · Community ImprovementALEUTIAN …Cooper Landing Emergency Services: $87,969 · Public Safety & DisasterGIRDWOOD FIRE & RESCUE INC: $15,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Health$554,648Other$484,965Human Services$375,852Community Improvement$138,086Public Safety & Disaster$102,969

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBristol Bay Area Health Corporation: $287,210 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOPPER RIVER EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $267,438 over 5y, 62% of budgetKodiak Area Native Association: $196,835 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHUGACHMIUT: $179,017 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC: $138,086 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCooper Landing Emergency Services: $87,969 over 5y, 17% of budgetNINILCHIK EMERGENCY SERVICES: $27,959 over 4y, 20% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation ↗
  • Who funds COPPER RIVER EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Kodiak Area Native Association ↗
  • Who funds CHUGACHMIUT ↗
  • Who funds ALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Cooper Landing Emergency Services ↗
  • Who funds NINILCHIK EMERGENCY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds GIRDWOOD FIRE & RESCUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alaska Community FoundationAK32.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Rasmuson Foundation · First Nations Development Institute · Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southern Region Emergency Medical Services Council Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southern Region Emergency Medical Services Council Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Southern Region Emergency Medical Services Council’s filings →

    More from the funding graph