· Public charity
Southern Region Emergency Medical Services Council Inc
Sremsc is a devoted team working for all the people of ems, helping them provide the best in patient care, integrating them into the health care team, and ensuring their commitment and value are recognized.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $117,302 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $126,887 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $9,585 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $103k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNALASKA FIRE DEPARTMENT | $31,318 |
| KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH | $29,245 |
| GIRDWOOD FIRE DEPARTMENT | $15,000 |
| CENTRAL ES | $14,000 |
| CORDOVA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT | $13,070 |
| SELDOVIA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT | $8,631 |
| CHIGNIK LAGOON VILLAGE COUNCIL | $6,038 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $376k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BBBristol Bay Area Health Corporation5× · 2017–2024 · $287k · revenue +152%
- CRCOPPER RIVER EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL INC5× · 2017–2021 · $267k · revenue +145% · 62% of their budget
- KAKodiak Area Native Association5× · 2017–2021 · $197k · revenue +85%
Funded once
- NVNative Village of Kanatakone grant, 2020 · $83k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $28k
- NINANWALEK IRA COUNCILone grant, 2021 · $19k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Offer assistance for emergency personnel.
To ensure the best possible emergency health care throughout southeast alaska
Our mission is to provide exceptional Advanced Life Support and medical care to our communities in Upstate New York. As a proud 501(c)3 non-profit organization, we serve the Town of Maine, Town of Nanticoke, the Village and Town of Newark…
Emergency ambulance services for 911 response. We primarily serve the three adjacent communities of Mars Hill Blaine and Bridgewater Maine and the unorganized townships nearby.
To finding and doing basic medical to people lost or have perished in the wilderness. Our goal is to bring people home safely!
To provide and facilitate appropriate and sustainable training for erm providers and the public in the region; to promote research and data collection relevant to em; to provide appropriate and sustainable equipment for ems providers and…
Providers of volunteer medical services and related training to the community of skaneateles and the surrounding areas. this organization has been providing life support services to the community for over 45 years.
Rescue and emergency medical services provided to the residents of yadkin county.
Rural Ambulance Service
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cooper Landing Emergency Services and the most unlike its peers is Ninilchik Emergency Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation ↗
- Who funds COPPER RIVER EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Kodiak Area Native Association ↗
- Who funds CHUGACHMIUT ↗
- Who funds ALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Cooper Landing Emergency Services ↗
- Who funds NINILCHIK EMERGENCY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds GIRDWOOD FIRE & RESCUE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Rasmuson Foundation · First Nations Development Institute · Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Southern Region Emergency Medical Services Council Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.