· Public charity
Southern Maine Agency on Aging
The Southern Maine Agency on Aging is the focal point in Cumberland and York counties for resources, services and information to empower older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers to live to their fullest potential.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $431,050 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $718,022 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $286,972 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $47k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $384k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Eastern Area Agency On Aging | $116,603 |
| Spectrum Generations | $104,179 |
| Aroostook Area Agency on Aging Inc | $83,036 |
| SeniorsPlus | $80,076 |
| Legal Services for Maine Elders | $47,156 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $677k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $431k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VTVET TO VET MAINE INC3× · 2020–2023 · $35k · revenue +151%
- FCFREEPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES3× · 2020–2023 · $35k · revenue +114%
- IHIn Her Presence3× · 2020–2023 · $35k · revenue +408%
Funded once
- MAMaine Association for New Americansone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -16%
- HFHARRISON FOOD BANKone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -59%
- SSSOUTH SUDANESE GROUP OF FRIENDSone grant, 2023 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A broad multi-disciplinary network that works to ensure we can all live healthy, engaged, and secure lives as we age in our homes and communities. With the voices of people with lived experience, we work on policy issues related to…
Providing Adult, children, and family mental health and social services. Providing home health and hospice services.
To recognize the resiliency of people who use drugs and to work in collaboration to create access points for overdose prevention and harm reduction services in Maine.
MAIN serves as a bridge and cultural broker for multilingual access to health and social services for immigrants, refugees, and asylees in our community.
Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…
To provide quality affordable housing
We strive to help individuals and families in Maine meet their basic, material needs by providing donated clothing, hygiene products, household items, and other necessities. We focus our work on those starting life over from scratch:…
Provide low-income defendants assistance in obtaining pretrial release and supervision.
Gateway Community Service seeks to encourage, support and build healthy connections with oneself and others in order to promote vibrancy and well-being, along with welcoming communities where all people feel accepted, valued and have a…
Residential, nursing care and community supports to adults with intellectual disabilities. Our mission is to enrich the lives of people with disabilities by
To enrich the quality of life of all people on Mount Desert Island through recreational, educational and social programs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Maine and the most unlike its peers is Crosswalk Community Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Eastern Area Agency on Aging ↗
- Who funds SPECTRUM GENERATIONS ↗
- Who funds Aroostook Area Agency on Aging Inc ↗
- Who funds SENIORSPLUS ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES FOR MAINE ELDERS INC ↗
- Who funds VET TO VET MAINE INC ↗
- Who funds FREEPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds In Her Presence ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Maine ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION SANFORD-SPRINGVALE ↗
- Who funds Presente Maine ↗
- Who funds Maine Association for New Americans ↗
- Who funds HARRISON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Khmer Maine ↗
- Who funds MAINE IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION ↗
- Who funds Gorham Ecumenical Food Pantry ↗
- Who funds York County Shelter Programs Inc ↗
- Who funds YORK COMMUNITY SERVICE ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds COMMONSPACE ↗
- Who funds GREATER PORTLAND IMMIGRANT WELCOME CENTER ↗
- Who funds HER SAFETY NET ↗
- Who funds AK HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds AGE FRIENDLY SACO ↗
- Who funds Portland Community Squash ↗
- Who funds CHURCH COMMUNITY OUTREACH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT GRACE ↗
- Who funds The Opportunity Alliance ↗
- Who funds Wayside Food Programs ↗
- Who funds YORK COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · John T Gorman Foundation · Good Shepherd Food Bank · United Way Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Maine Health Access Foundation Inc · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Simmons Foundation - PerkinsThompson · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Saco & Biddeford Savings Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Southern Maine Agency on Aging funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.