Skip to content

· Private foundation

Southeastern Christian Education Corporation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2026still arriving
9
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$222kReligion$16kOther$0
02FY2026 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k8 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$2,600
Median grant
5
States reached
$259k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREED HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY$13,000
HARDING UNIVERSITY$7,800
ASBURY UNIVERSITY$7,800
LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY$6,500
Individual grant recipient$2,600
CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY$2,600
BRYAN COLLEGE$2,600
HUNTINGTON UNIVERSITY$2,600
KENTUCKY CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$1,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FREED HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY: $13k → 10%CENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $3k → 17%LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%BRYAN COLLEGE: $3k → 14%MILLIGAN COLLEGE: $5k → 18%CHERRY STREET CHURCH: $3k → 10%HUNTINGTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 13%BETHEL UNIVERSITY: $3k → 13%CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 9%ASBURY UNIVERSITY: $10k → 12%SBTS BOYCE: $8k → 15%PORTLAND CHRISTIAN: $25k → 18%KENTUCKY CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 20%FREED HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY: $13k → 10%CENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $3k → 17%LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $7k → 14%BRYAN COLLEGE: $3k → 14%MILLIGAN COLLEGE: $3k → 18%CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 9%ASBURY UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%SBTS BOYCE: $8k → 15%PORTLAND CHRISTIAN: $25k → 18%KENTUCKY CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 20%FREED HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 10%LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 9%ASBURY UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%SBTS BOYCE: $5k → 15%PORTLAND CHRISTIAN: $25k → 18%FREED HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 10%LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 9%ASBURY UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%SBTS BOYCE: $3k → 15%FREED HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 10%LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $3k → 14%CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%ASBURY UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%SBTS BOYCE: $3k → 15%ASBURY UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%SBTS BOYCE: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$378k · 13 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$378k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
-6%

Still filing today

62%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    FREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2021–2026 · $40k · revenue +33%
  • LU
    LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2022–2026 · $33k · revenue +20%
  • CU
    Cedarville University
    5× · 2022–2026 · $29k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • CS
    CHERRY STREET CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • BU
    BETHEL UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
2
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
3
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
4
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
5
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
6
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
7
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education
8
Spring Arbor University

Spring arbor university is a community of learners distinguished by our lifelong involvement in the study and application of the liberal arts, total commitment to jesus christ as the perspective for learning and critical participation in…

Education
9
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
10
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
11
University of Mary Hardin-Baylor

The university of mary hardin-baylor prepares students for leadership, service, and faith-informed discrenment in a global society. academic excellence, personal attention, broad-based scholarship and a commitment to a baptist vision for…

Education
12
Corban University

Corban university's goal is to equip men and women who will bring character to their communities and competence to their careers, all to the glory of christ.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freed-Hardeman University; the most unlike its peers is Harding University Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHarding University Inc: $61,100 · OtherHarding University IncJOHNSON UNIVERSITY: $33,800 · OtherJOHNSON UNIVERSITYLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $32,500 · OtherLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $28,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHURCH OF CHRIST WORLDWIDE: $13,000 · Other+2 more: $8,416 · OtherASBURY COLLEGE: $42,900 · EducationASBURY COLLEGEFREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY: $40,300 · EducationFREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITYCedarville University: $28,600 · EducationCedarville UniversityMILLIGAN UNIVERSITY: $7,800 · EducationMILLIGAN UNIVERSITYBRYAN COLLEGE: $5,200 · Education+3 more: $9,100 · Education+3 more
Other$252,416Education$133,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHarding University Inc: $61,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASBURY COLLEGE: $42,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY: $40,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $32,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCedarville University: $28,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILLIGAN UNIVERSITY: $7,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRYAN COLLEGE: $5,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $3,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETHEL UNIVERSITY INC: $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Harding University Inc ↗
  • Who funds ASBURY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Cedarville University ↗
  • Who funds MILLIGAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BRYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Huntington University ↗
  • Who funds BETHEL UNIVERSITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southeastern Christian Education Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southeastern Christian Education Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Southeastern Christian Education Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to Southeastern Christian Education Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Southeastern Christian Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph