· Public charity
Southeast Iowa Regional Medical Center Inc
Southeast iowa regional medical center is dedicated to improving the region's health by providing high-quality care, world-class customer service, and uncompromising value for our patients and their families.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 82% of SOUTHEAST IOWA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
- $250k+3 grants · $19M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREAT RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM | $16,500,000 |
| GREAT RIVER HEALTH FOUNDATION INC | $1,749,778 |
| SOUTHEASTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $330,820 |
| BURLINGTON CAPITOL THEATER | $50,200 |
| TRI STATE RODEO ASSOCIATION | $31,800 |
| GREATER BURLINGTON PARTNERSHIP | $26,000 |
| FORT MADISON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT | $25,000 |
| IOWA POISON CONTROL CENTER | $12,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against -18% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GRGREAT RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM INC4× · 2022–2025 · $26M · revenue +168%
- HCHENRY COUNTY HEALTH CENTER INC2× · 2022–2024 · $10M · revenue +64%
- GRGREAT RIVER HEALTH FOUNDATION INC2× · 2024–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +40% · 43% of their budget
Funded once
- GHGRHS HOLDINGS INCone grant, 2022 · $165M · revenue -96% · 45% of their budget
- FMFORT MADISON COMMUNITY HOSPITALone grant, 2021 · $5.7M · revenue 0%
- RSRIVERVIEW SYSTEM LTDone grant, 2024 · $3.0M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Southeast iowa regional medical center is dedicated to improving the region's health by providing high-quality care, world-class customer service, and uncompromising value for our patients and their families.
The organization promotes, develops and advances the business community in iowa city and the surrounding area. in addition, the organization connects business and industry with federal, state and local resources to enable and stimulate…
Our mission is to inspire the iowa city area to be greater by: 1) elevating business, 2) investing in strategic initiatives, and 3) advocating for the economic resiliency of the greater community.
To attract businesses to locate in madison county, iowa
The mission of the iowa business council is to engage the personal commitment of its executive members in active leadership roles on major initiatives that offer opportuinities to enhance iowa's overall economic vitality.
Promotion and advancement of activities and programs that provide community enrichment including but not limited to: fundraising, management, and enhancement of riverfront properties of burlington, iowa, and ensuring continued operation of…
To promote the common business interests of member companies without profit and without the inuring of income to the benefit of any member company or individual. to present the executive, legislative, judicial and regulatory bodies…
The iowa corn promotion board (icpb) works to develop and defend markets, fund research, and provide education about corn and corn products. icpb's mission is to create opportunities for long term iowa corn grower profitability.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grow Greater Burlington Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tri State Rodeo Association Shelby W Bearden. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 27. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GRHS HOLDINGS INC ↗
- Who funds GREAT RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds HENRY COUNTY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FORT MADISON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds GREAT RIVER HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BURLINGTON WEST BURLINGTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds THE CAPITOL THEATER FOUNDATION OF BURLINGTON IOWA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHEAST IOWA ↗
- Who funds FORT MADISON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds TRI STATE RODEO ASSOCIATION SHELBY W BEARDEN ↗
- Who funds IOWA STATEWIDE POISON CONTROL CENTER ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI VALLEY COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds GROW GREATER BURLINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds BURLINGTON CIVIC MUSIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BURLINGTON AREA YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds BURLINGTON AREA SOCCER CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds DES MOINES COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FORT MADISON RODEO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LEE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP ↗
- Who funds IOWA HEALTHIEST STATE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds PURPLE & GRAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ART GUILD OF BURLINGTON ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST IOWA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION SOUTHEAST IOWA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds BURLINGTON COMMUNITY POLICING FOUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Harry & Virginia Murray Foundation · John H Witte Jr Foundation Trust · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Great River Health System Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Southeast Iowa Regional Medical Center Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.