Loading…
· Public charity
SOUTH FLORIDA HUNGER COALITION CO MICHAEL FARVER
The organization works to eradicate hunger and increae child nutrition and health by acting as a resource, conserver and developer of hunger and nutrition related initiatives and programs.
$217k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants
1
Communities
$203k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of SOUTH FLORIDA HUNGER COALITION CO MICHAEL FARVER’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
housing authoritybeach housing
2021
housing authoritychurchoverbeach housingmealsdaniamethodist
2022
gospelpantrychurchoverlivesneedychildren
2023
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$202,606
Median grant
1
States reached
$636k
Total assets
Largest grants
- MOBILE SCHOOL PANTRY$202,606
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $237k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$397k · 11 repeat orgs$126k to everyone else
11 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
11
17
Total granted
$397k
$126k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+17%
+39%
Still filing today
27%
41%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesFood & NutritionReligionOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MSMOBILE SCHOOL PANTRY4× · 2021–2024 · $220k · revenue +147% · 65% of their budget
- DBDEERFIELD BEACH HOUSING AUTHORITYDEERFIELD BEACH HOUSING AUTHORITY2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +17%
- HSHOPE SOUTH FLORIDA INC2× · 2021–2022 · $14k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- JSJOSEPH'S STOREHOUSE FORT LAUDERDALE INCone grant, 2021 · $23k
- POPANTRY OF BROWARD INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue +48%
- NUNORLAND UNITED METHODIST CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $11k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Victory At Sarasota Inc
We are a church, food bank, outreach that ministers the love of Jesus to our city and the surrounding cities by preaching and teaching the word of God every Sunday. We also minister to anyone with a food need weekly through our food bank.…
Religion
2
Our Daily Bread Christian Food Ministry Inc
The purpose of this company is to provide food to homeless and indigent families in our area.
Human Services
3
Faith Outreach Ministries of the Grand Strand
Non profit ministry that seeks to improve the community through providing food, and other services for humanity
Human Services
4
Christian Faith Ministry
Feeding the hungry
Human Services
5
Star of David Outreach Ministries
Church with food pantry
Food & Nutrition
6
Blessing Room Food Pantry Inc
Food & Nutrition
7
Messengers of Hope Mission Inc
mobile food pantry
Food & Nutrition
8
Victory Life Church International
Church, religious
Religion
9
South Beach Christian Outreach
Building community through a number of programs and services... Food Distribution, Meal Program, Clothing & personal Item distribution.
Human Services
10
Joshuas Mission of Hope Inc
Giving hope to disadvantaged children
Education
11
Community Faith Outreach Ministries Inc
Community Faith Outreach Mission is to establish/foster the creation & implementation of planned activities geared to raise the economic, educational & social levels of minorities residing in Palm Beach & Broward Counties. Also promote…
Community Improvement
12
Helping Neighbors Feed Neighbors Inc
Feed food insecure residents
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope South Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Seeds Sowers of Faith Christia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
05the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$260,353Human Services$237,106Food & Nutrition$17,147Religion$8,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOBILE SCHOOL PANTRY ↗
- Who funds DEERFIELD BEACH HOUSING AUTHORITYDEERFIELD BEACH HOUSING AUTHORITY ↗
- Who funds HOPE SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds PANTRY OF BROWARD INC ↗
- Who funds NOURISHING LIVES INC ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE CENTER OF SOUTH BROWARD INC ↗
- Who funds BLESSED PROVISIONS INC ↗
- Who funds WECARE SOREF JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ARCHDIOCESAN COUNCIL OF MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds MOBILE SCHOOL PANTRY ↗
- Who funds TEAM OF LIFE (ESSIE REED THE INCREDIBLE BIG MAMA) ↗
- Who funds OUR FATHERS HOUSE SOUP KITCHEN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation of Broward IncFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Broward Inc · The Miami Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation SOUTH FLORIDA HUNGER COALITION CO MICHAEL FARVER funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MOBILE SCHOOL PANTRY.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~16 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 9 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 273012602 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on MOBILE SCHOOL PANTRY, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 16 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 65% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to South Florida Hunger Coalition Co Michael Farver?
Find your warmest path to South Florida Hunger Coalition Co Michael Farver through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines