Skip to content

· Public charity

Sourcewise

The Mission of Sourcewise is to foster a comprehensive coordinated home and community based service delivery system to meet the needs of older persons and their caregivers in Santa Clara.

$9.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6.8M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$46MHuman Services$9.4MHealth$5.6MEducation$428kFood & Nutrition$396kPublic Benefit$308kYouth Development$50kHousing & Shelter$23k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $113k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $853k
  • $250k+4 grants · $8.3M
$85,407
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
County of Santa Clara$6,823,332
Catholic Charities of Santa Clara County$683,232
Senior Adults Legal Assistance$394,108
Live Oak Adult Day Services$370,346
Community Services Agency of Mountain View and Los Altos$197,300
Hearts and Minds Activity Center$133,785
Avenidas$115,279
San Jose State University Research Foundation - Timpany Center$92,991
Asian American Community for Involvement$85,407
Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association Inc$64,800
Peninsula Volunteers Inc$59,838
Family Caregiver Alliance$53,481
Loaves & Fishes Family Kitchen$50,015
Bloom USA Catering$49,659
West Valley Community Services$23,179
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $9.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Peninsula Volunteers Inc: $60k → 7%Avenidas: $115k → 8%Peninsula Volunteers Inc: $53k → 7%Avenidas: $26k → 8%Peninsula Volunteers Inc: $24k → 7%Outreach & Escort Inc: $24k → 8%Yu-Ai Kai: $126k → 8%Yu-Ai Kai: $77k → 8%Yu-Ai Kai: $67k → 8%Yu-Ai Kai: $64k → 8%Yu-Ai Kai: $57k → 8%Hunger at Home: $19k → 8%Avenidas: $249k → 8%Avenidas: $179k → 8%Avenidas: $165k → 8%Avenidas: $156k → 8%Avenidas: $69k → 8%Avenidas: $59k → 8%Avenidas: $24k → 8%Martha's Kitchen: $83k → 8%Martha's Kitchen: $29k → 8%Live Oak Adult Day Services: $471k → 8%Live Oak Adult Day Services: $383k → 8%Live Oak Adult Day Services: $370k → 8%Live Oak Adult Day Service: $276k → 8%Live Oak Adult Day Service: $223k → 8%Live Oak Adult Day Service: $220k → 8%Live Oak Adult Day Service: $206k → 8%Live Oak Adult Day Service: $96k → 8%Live Oak Adult Day Service: $86k → 8%Community Services Agency of Mountain View and Los Altos: $197k → 8%Catholic Charities of Santa Clara County: $805k → 8%Community Services Agency of Mountain View and Los Altos: $102k → 8%Catholic Charities of Santa Clara County: $784k → 8%Community Services Agency of Mountain View and Los Altos: $60k → 8%Catholic Charities of Santa Clara County: $683k → 8%CSA of Mt View & L Altos: $50k → 8%Catholic Charity Santa Clara: $589k → 8%CSA of Mt View & L Altos: $50k → 8%Catholic Charity Santa Clara: $545k → 8%CSA of Mt View & L Altos: $35k → 8%Catholic Charities Santa Clar: $482k → 8%CSA of Mt View & L Altos: $25k → 8%Catholic Charities Santa Clar: $394k → 8%CSA of Mt View & L Altos: $24k → 8%Catholic Charities Santa Clar: $347k → 8%CSA of Mt View & L Altos: $24k → 8%Catholic Charities Santa Clar: $326k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62M · 19 repeat orgs$289k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
4

Total granted

$62M
$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+23%

Still filing today

79%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.0M · revenue +43%
  • SA
    SENIOR ADULTS LEGAL ASSISTANCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +42% · 44% of their budget
  • LO
    LIVE OAK ADULT DAY SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +38% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • VS
    Valley Services
    one grant, 2023 · $140k
  • OE
    OUTREACH & ESCORT INC
    one grant, 2017 · $24k · revenue -68%
  • GF
    GARDNER FAMILY CARE CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $22k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
2
Asian Community Center of Sacramento Valley Inc Dba Acc Senior Services

The asian community center of sacramento valley's mission is to promote the general welfare and enhance the quality of life for our community by identifying, developing, and providing culturally sensitive health and social services for…

Health
3
Wise and Healthy Aging

The organization is a multi-service, 501c(3) not-for-profit, social services organization serving seniors throughout los angeles and san bernardio counties, with emphasis on low-income and/or underserved individuals. the organization…

Health
4
Conejo Valley Senior Concerns Inc

Senior concerns' mission is to provide programs and services which support and improve the health, well-being and quality of life for seniors and family caregivers.

Human Services
5
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
6
Meals On Wheels of San Francisco Inc

To provide isolated homebound seniors in san francisco with nutritious meals, daily human contact, and supportive services to prevent their premature institutionalization.

—
7
Institute On Aging

See schedule othe mission of the institute on aging is to enhance the quality of life for adults as they age by enabling them to maintain their health, well being, independence and participation in the community. ioa fulfills this mission…

Human Services
8
Family Bridges Inc

We empower individuals, families, and seniors to achieve wellness, stability, and independence through culturally-competent care.

—
9
Curry Senior Center

To provide services to seniors that promote independent living while maintaining their dignity and self-esteem.

Human Services
10
Sunnyvale Community Services

The mission of sunnyvale community services is to prevent homelessness and hunger for low-income sunnyvale residents facing temporary crises.

Human Services
11
Chac Fka Community Health Awareness Council

Chac seeks to improve lives and strengthen communities through access to comprehensive and culturally responsive mental health services in northern santa clara county.

Health
12
Meals On Wheels of the Salinas Valley

No senior should go hungry. nutritious meals, which are delivered by caring volunteers, improve the health and well-being of people who are homebound, elderly, or disabled and help them remain in their homes and maintain their independence.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Live Oak Adult Day Services; the most unlike its peers is Bloom Charity Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

County of Santa Clara: $43,088,719 · OtherCounty of Santa Clara+7 more: $1,734,969 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $4,955,622 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIE…LIVE OAK ADULT DAY SERVICES: $2,331,362 · Human ServicesLIVE OAK ADULT DA…AVENIDAS: $1,041,161 · Human ServicesAVENIDASCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC: $566,752 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVICE…YU-AI KAI JAPANTOWN COMMUNITY SENIOR CENTER: $390,951 · Human Services+4 more: $291,638 · Human ServicesTHE HEALTH TRUST: $2,445,863 · HealthHEARTS & MINDS ACTIVITY CENTER: $1,447,152 · HealthFAMILY CAREGIVER ALLIANCE: $282,619 · HealthTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $145,407 · HealthSENIOR ADULTS LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $2,675,336 · Crime & LegalSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $428,478 · EducationLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN: $124,564 · Food & NutritionBLOOM CHARITY NFP: $49,659 · Youth DevelopmentWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $23,179 · Housing & Shelter
Other$44,823,688Human Services$9,577,486Health$4,321,041Crime & Legal$2,675,336Education$428,478Food & Nutrition$124,564Youth Development$49,659Housing & Shelter$23,179

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $4,955,622 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetSENIOR ADULTS LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $2,675,336 over 9y, 44% of budgetTHE HEALTH TRUST: $2,445,863 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetLIVE OAK ADULT DAY SERVICES: $2,331,362 over 9y, 30% of budgetHEARTS & MINDS ACTIVITY CENTER: $1,447,152 over 9y, 14% of budgetAVENIDAS: $1,041,161 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC: $566,752 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $428,478 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetYU-AI KAI JAPANTOWN COMMUNITY SENIOR CENTER: $390,951 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetFAMILY CAREGIVER ALLIANCE: $282,619 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $145,407 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $136,699 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN: $124,564 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY HEALTH: $123,099 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARTHA'S KITCHEN: $112,506 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBLOOM CHARITY NFP: $49,659 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $23,179 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGARDNER FAMILY CARE CORPORATION: $22,280 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR ADULTS LEGAL ASSISTANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE HEALTH TRUST ↗
  • Who funds LIVE OAK ADULT DAY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS & MINDS ACTIVITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AVENIDAS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YU-AI KAI JAPANTOWN COMMUNITY SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CAREGIVER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds BLOOM CHARITY NFP ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH & ESCORT INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds GARDNER FAMILY CARE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER AT HOME ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund IncCA36.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · The Health Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Second Harvest of Silicon Valley · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · Stanford Health Care

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sourcewise funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sourcewise. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sourcewise?

    Find your warmest path to Sourcewise through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sourcewise’s filings →

    More from the funding graph