· Public charity
Sourcewise
The Mission of Sourcewise is to foster a comprehensive coordinated home and community based service delivery system to meet the needs of older persons and their caregivers in Santa Clara.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $113k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $853k
- $250k+4 grants · $8.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| County of Santa Clara | $6,823,332 |
| Catholic Charities of Santa Clara County | $683,232 |
| Senior Adults Legal Assistance | $394,108 |
| Live Oak Adult Day Services | $370,346 |
| Community Services Agency of Mountain View and Los Altos | $197,300 |
| Hearts and Minds Activity Center | $133,785 |
| Avenidas | $115,279 |
| San Jose State University Research Foundation - Timpany Center | $92,991 |
| Asian American Community for Involvement | $85,407 |
| Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association Inc | $64,800 |
| Peninsula Volunteers Inc | $59,838 |
| Family Caregiver Alliance | $53,481 |
| Loaves & Fishes Family Kitchen | $50,015 |
| Bloom USA Catering | $49,659 |
| West Valley Community Services | $23,179 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $9.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY9× · 2017–2025 · $5.0M · revenue +43%
- SASENIOR ADULTS LEGAL ASSISTANCE9× · 2017–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +42% · 44% of their budget
- LOLIVE OAK ADULT DAY SERVICES9× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +38% · 30% of their budget
Funded once
- VSValley Servicesone grant, 2023 · $140k
- OEOUTREACH & ESCORT INCone grant, 2017 · $24k · revenue -68%
- GFGARDNER FAMILY CARE CORPORATIONone grant, 2017 · $22k · revenue +23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.
The asian community center of sacramento valley's mission is to promote the general welfare and enhance the quality of life for our community by identifying, developing, and providing culturally sensitive health and social services for…
Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…
The organization is a multi-service, 501c(3) not-for-profit, social services organization serving seniors throughout los angeles and san bernardio counties, with emphasis on low-income and/or underserved individuals. the organization…
To provide isolated homebound seniors in san francisco with nutritious meals, daily human contact, and supportive services to prevent their premature institutionalization.
Senior concerns' mission is to provide programs and services which support and improve the health, well-being and quality of life for seniors and family caregivers.
The mission of sunnyvale community services is to prevent homelessness and hunger for low-income sunnyvale residents facing temporary crises.
We empower individuals, families, and seniors to achieve wellness, stability, and independence through culturally-competent care.
Valley village encourages seniors to live at their highest level of independence and personal dignity by providing modestly priced and well-established housing with a variety of services.
Chac seeks to improve lives and strengthen communities through access to comprehensive and culturally responsive mental health services in northern santa clara county.
To provide services to seniors that promote independent living while maintaining their dignity and self-esteem.
No senior should go hungry. nutritious meals, which are delivered by caring volunteers, improve the health and well-being of people who are homebound, elderly, or disabled and help them remain in their homes and maintain their independence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Live Oak Adult Day Services and the most unlike its peers is Bloom Charity Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SENIOR ADULTS LEGAL ASSISTANCE ↗
- Who funds THE HEALTH TRUST ↗
- Who funds LIVE OAK ADULT DAY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HEARTS & MINDS ACTIVITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds AVENIDAS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC ↗
- Who funds SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YU-AI KAI JAPANTOWN COMMUNITY SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CAREGIVER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
- Who funds LOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds BAY AREA COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds BLOOM CHARITY NFP ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH & ESCORT INC ↗
- Who funds WEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds GARDNER FAMILY CARE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HUNGER AT HOME ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · The Health Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Second Harvest of Silicon Valley · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · Stanford Health Care
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sourcewise funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sourcewise?
Find your warmest path to Sourcewise through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.