· Private foundation
Sorg-Vogt Charitable Foundation Trust 3844
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k61 grants · $55k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Stone Soup Cafe | $27,737 |
| Quabbin Food Connector | $27,737 |
| Vermont Food Bank | $6,000 |
| Garden Path Elder Living | $4,000 |
| Brattleboro Memorial Hospital - Dev Off | $3,000 |
| Dummerston Congregational Church | $3,000 |
| Green Mountain Club | $3,000 |
| Northeast Wilderness Trust | $3,000 |
| Randolph Area Food Shelf | $2,000 |
| Chandler Center for the Arts | $1,500 |
| West Brookfield Village Trust | $1,500 |
| Vermont Community Foundation | $1,500 |
| Childrens Literacy Foundation | $1,000 |
| United Way Of Windham County | $1,000 |
| Friends of Brooks Memorial Library | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
60 repeat relationships — 57 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BMBrattleboro Memorial Hospital6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +16%
NORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION4× · 2022–2025 · $9k · revenue +59%- WCWellesley College6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- VMVILLAGE MICRO FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $26k · revenue +195%
- DBDetroit Black Community Food Sovereignty Networkone grant, 2024 · $26k · revenue 0%
- DBDetroit Black Community Food Security Neone grant, 2023 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Protect land along rivers, lakes and wetlands of vt; protect public access, wildlife habitat, scenic natural beauty, and ecological integrity.
To protect and enhance the natural resources of vermont in order to promote the well-being of present and future generations of vermonters and visitors; preserve and aid in the preservation of open land along rivers and lakes; protect and…
To sustain a sound economy and preserve vermont's unique quality of life by studying and making recommendations on statewide public policy issues.
To provide research and education on issues of importance to the natural, human, and economic environments of vermont citizens.
Provide nature-based education and mentoring to youth and adults in southern vermont and western massachusetts.
Vermont woodlands association's (vwa) mission is to educate and advocate for the practices of productive stewardship, use, and enjoyment of vermont's woodlands. we achieve this mission by delivering educational programs and technical…
The mission of cooperation vermont is to build thriving community economic and enviromental democracy.
See schedule othe mission of the vermont council on world affairs is to promote awareness and understanding of the world and its people, places and cultures through education and engagement. the future of vermont depends upon the world…
The mission of alliance for vermont communities, inc. is to protect working farms, forests and communities of central vermont and to promote responsible development that will sustain the rural heritage and values for present and future…
Conducts and coordinates research of critical issues affecting vermonters. also conducts public opinion research.
Vermont electric cooperative is a member owned not-for-profit whose mission is to provide safe, affordable, and reliable energy services to its members.
The mission of cooperation vermont community land trust is to reclaim the commons.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Vermont Center for Ecostudies Inc and the most unlike its peers is Village Micro Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Stone Soup Cafe Inc ↗
- Who funds QUABBIN FOOD CONNECTOR ↗
- Who funds GARDEN PATH ELDER LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE MICRO FUND ↗
- Who funds Detroit Black Community Food Sovereignty Network ↗
- Who funds North Carolina Association of Black Lawyer Land Loss Prevention Projec ↗
- Who funds THE VERMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Black Sustainability Inc ↗
- Who funds WHYHUNGER INC ↗
- Who funds Brattleboro Memorial Hospital ↗
- Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE GREEN MOUNTAIN CLUB INC DEBONIS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WINDHAM COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Wellesley College ↗
- Who funds GROUNDWORKS COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds CHANDLER CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds WINDMILL HILL PINNACLE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Brattleboro Inc ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RANDOLPH AREA FOOD SHELF ↗
- Who funds Green Mountain Camp Inc ↗
- Who funds RETREAT FARM LTD ↗
- Who funds WINSTON PROUTY CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds INTERACTION INC ↗
- Who funds KENT PLACE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BRATTLEBORO MUSEUM & ART CENTERINC ↗
- Who funds BRATTLEBORO SENIOR MEALS INC ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc ↗
- Who funds GREEN MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BRATTLEBORO AREA HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON AGING FOR SOUTHEASTERN VERMONT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · The Windham Foundation Inc · Thomas Thompson Trust · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · George W Mergens Foundation · Lintilhac Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Periwinkle Foundation Inc · Oakland Foundation Inc · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sorg-Vogt Charitable Foundation Trust 3844 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Central Vermont Council On Aging Inc — 74% of income from government
- Groundworks Collaborative Inc — 73% of income from government
- Interaction Inc — 70% of income from government
- Vermont Humanities Council — 67% of income from government
- Aids Project of Southern Vermont — 55% of income from government
- Vermont Historical Society — 51% of income from government
- Green Mountain Conservancy Incorporated — 49% of income from government
- Windmill Hill Pinnacle Association — 47% of income from government
- Vermont Youth Conservation Corps Inc — 47% of income from government
- Vermont Land Trust Inc — 42% of income from government
- United Way of Windham County Inc — 26% of income from government
- Stone Soup Cafe Inc — 26% of income from government
- Retreat Farm Ltd — 25% of income from government
- The Green Mountain Club Inc Debonis — 17% of income from government
- Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
- Friends of the Winooski River Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Vermont Center for Ecostudies Inc — 4% of income from government
- North Branch Nature Center Inc — 4% of income from government
- Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Chandler Center for the Arts Inc — 2% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- Brattleboro Museum & Art Centerinc — 1% of income from government
- Landmark College Inc — 1% of income from government
- Brattleboro Memorial Hospital — 1% of income from government
- Garden Path Elder Living Inc — 0% of income from government
- Vermont Public Co — 0% of income from government
- Vermont Institute of Natural Science Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Vermont Community Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.