Skip to content
Sorci Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Sorci Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$224kHealth$99kReligion$91kYouth Development$55kFood & Nutrition$44kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kEnvironment$26kHousing & Shelter$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NO TIME TO WASTE$10,000
KOKUA KALIHI VALLEY$10,000
NOR CAL ACADEMY$10,000
THE ECOLOGY CENTER$10,000
THE LIFE CENTER OF SANTA ANA$9,500
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$5,000
WAIMANALO HEALTH CENTER$5,000
VALLEY VERDE$5,000
NOR CAL ACADEMY$5,000
LAURA'S HOUSE$5,000
OPERATION FREEDOM PAWS$5,000
SAN JOSE AUXILIARY FOR CHILDREN$5,000
MONKEY TAIL RANCH$4,000
MORGAN AUTISM CENTER$2,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $229k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MONKEY TAIL RANCH: $4k → 7%VALLEY VERDE: $5k → 8%LAURA'S HOUSE: $5k → 10%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE: $25k → 8%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE: $25k → 8%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE: $10k → 8%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE: $10k → 8%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE: $10k → 8%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE: $10k → 8%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE: $8k → 8%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE: $2k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 8%NO TIME TO WASTE: $10k → 8%NO TIME TO WASTE: $5k → 8%NO TIME TO WASTE: $5k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $25k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $25k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $10k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$616k · 27 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
12

Total granted

$616k
$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+16%

Still filing today

70%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentReligionEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND ENPOWERMENT
    7× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue ×46
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $60k · revenue +28%
  • TN
    The NorCal Academy
    3× · 2023–2025 · $35k · revenue +69% · 45% of their budget

Funded once

  • ST
    SHINE THE LIGHT CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • ND
    NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
Gardner Family Health Network Inc

Gardner Health Services (GHS) is dedicated to providing high quality, comprehensive medical and mental healthcare, including prevention and education, early intervention, treatment and advocacy services which are affordable, respectful,…

Health
3
Equity Health

Our mission is to ensure health care access to quality comprehensive health care services for persons who are medically needy or medically under-served and have traditionally experienced difficulty in getting care from traditional sources.

—
4
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
5
Santa Cruz Community Health Centers

Our mission is to improve the health of our patients and the community and advocate the feminist goals of social, political, & economic equality.

Health
6
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
7
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc

Planned Parenthood Northern California generates healthier communities through the delivery of quality sexual and reproductive health care services.

Health
9
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
10
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
11
Valley Health Team Inc

Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically…

Health
12
Aliados Health

See schedule o.aliados health is a regional association of 17 community health centers with sites in marin, napa, sonoma, contra costa, solano, and yolo counties. the organization was formed in 1994. our mission is to improve access to,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Health Trust; the most unlike its peers is Norcal Academy of Performing Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $68,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe NorCal Academy: $35,000 · OtherThe NorCal AcademyST FRANCIS OF ASSISI: $32,000 · OtherST FRANCIS OF ASSISISHINE THE LIGHT CAMPAIGN: $30,000 · OtherSHINE THE LIGHT CAMPAIGNSAN JOSE AUXILIARY FOR CHILDREN dba THRIFT BOX: $20,000 · OtherSAN JOSE AUXILIARY FOR CHILDREN dba THRIFT BOXPARISI HOUSE: $19,010 · OtherPARISI HOUSECatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · Other+16 more: $81,500 · Other+16 moreAMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND ENPOWERMENT: $99,500 · Human ServicesAMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE …CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $60,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNT…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Const…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCNO TIME TO WASTE: $20,000 · Human ServicesNO TIME TO WASTE+4 more: $19,000 · Human Services+4 moreVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $28,000 · HealthVALLEY HEALT…KOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES: $17,500 · HealthKOKUA KALIHI…MOMENTUM FOR HEALTH: $15,000 · HealthMOMENTUM FOR…CANCER CAREPOINT INC: $14,000 · HealthCANCER CAREP…WAIMANALO HEALTH CENTER: $5,000 · HealthWAIMANALO HE…+1 more: $2,000 · HealthECOLOGY CENTER: $12,000 · EnvironmentFIBERSHED: $12,000 · EnvironmentOrange County Coastkeeper: $2,000 · EnvironmentCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $14,000 · ReligionTHE LIFE CENTER OF SANTA ANA: $9,500 · ReligionSANDY FEET INITIATIVE: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORCAL ACADEMY OF PERFORMING ARTS: $17,000 · Education
Other$309,010Human Services$251,500Health$81,500Environment$26,000Religion$23,500Youth Development$20,000Education$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND ENPOWERMENT: $99,500 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe NorCal Academy: $35,000 over 3y, 45% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $23,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOSE AUXILIARY FOR CHILDREN dba THRIFT BOX: $20,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSANDY FEET INITIATIVE: $20,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetNO TIME TO WASTE: $20,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetKOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOMENTUM FOR HEALTH: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER CAREPOINT INC: $14,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetECOLOGY CENTER: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIBERSHED: $12,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJasper Ridge Farm: $8,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMORGAN AUTISM CENTER: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetValley Verde: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGILROY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWAIMANALO HEALTH CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Monkey Tail Ranch Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOrange County Coastkeeper: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HEALTH TRUST: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Star One Credit UnionRotary Club of San Jo…San Jose Mercury News…Los Altos Mountain Vi…Agilent Technologies …The Sobrato Family Fo…The David and Lucile …Tides FoundationSosj Knights Hospital…The Health Trust
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA23× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Star One Credit Union · Rotary Club of San Jose Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Agilent Technologies Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Tides Foundation · Sosj Knights Hospitaller Priory of the Western USA · The Health Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sorci Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sorci Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sorci Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home