Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sophie and David Rubin Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2021
17
Grants FY2021
7
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202021.

Education$12kReligion$9kFood & Nutrition$7kHuman Services$5kHealth$2kPhilanthropy$2kInternational$2kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2021 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LEFFELL SCHOOL$7,000
JCC OF GREATER COLUMBUS$2,500
COLUMBUS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL$2,500
CONG AGUDAS ACHIM$2,000
MAZON$2,000
ACADEMY FOR JEWISH RELIGION$1,000
UNITED JEWISH FED OF NNJ$1,000
JCC OF GREATER COLUMBUS$500
JEWISH FAM AND CHILDRENS SVC$500
NECHAMA$500
THE LEFFELL SCHOOL$500
ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENT FOR THE BLIND$300
MIDNIGHT RUN$250
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID$200
FRIENDS OF OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBR$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENT FOR THE BLIND: $300 → 6%PROJECT EZRA: $500 → 17%DOROT: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
WV
MD
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11k · 3 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +115% since the first grant, against +85% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
11

Total granted

$11k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+115%
+85%

Still filing today

67%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
Human ServicesInternationalEducationEmploymentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger
    2× · 2020–2021 · $6k · revenue +45%
  • TA
    THE ACADEMY FOR JEWISH RELIGION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +115%
  • N
    NECHAMA
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k

Funded once

  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • MA
    MARBURN ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -20%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION
    one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

2
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
3
Avodah the Jewish Service Corps Inc

Avodah develops lifelong social justice leaders whose work is informed by jewish values and who inspire the jewish community to work toward a more just and equitable world.

Community Improvement
4
Joint Israel

To help build a more just society by creating model programs for disadvantaged populations. The activities focus primarily on helping Israel overcome the challenges facing five groups (cont. on sched O):

International
5
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
6
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
7
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

8
Atlanta Jewish Academy Inc

Atlanta jewish academy is a college preparatory, co-educational, preschool-12th grade, independent jewish day school, guided by modern orthodox values and principles. we embody the ideals of community, tradition, individual development and…

Education
9
The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc

Since 1914, the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (JDC) has acted on behalf of North America's Jewish communities and others to fulfill the principle that "kol Yisrael arevim zeh l'zeh" - all Jews are responsible for one…

International
10
American Jewish University

American jewish university (aju) advances and elevates the jewish journey of individuals, organizations and our community through excellence in scholarship, teaching, engaged conversation, and outreach. aju is a thriving center of jewish…

Education
11
Akiva School

At akiva, we pursue excellence, foster critical inquiry, and inspire informed jewish living. we believe in, promote, and expect academic excellence in our general studies and jewish studies curriculum. our educational program incorporates…

12
Dorot Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dorot Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE LEFFELL SCHOOL — $7,500 · OtherTHE LEFFELL SCHOOLMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $6,000 · OtherMAZON A Jewish Response to HungerTHE ACADEMY FOR JEWISH RELIGION — $3,500 · OtherTHE ACADEMY FOR JEWISH RELIGIONTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER COLUMBUS — $3,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER COLUMBUSMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER — $2,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCERCONG AGUDAS ACHIM — $2,000 · OtherCONG AGUDAS ACHIM+10 more — $6,700 · Other+10 moreTHE COLUMBUS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL — $2,500 · EducationTHE COLUMBU…MARBURN ACADEMY — $1,500 · EducationMARBURN ACA…FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC — $500 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $500 · InternationalHIAS INC — $500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $200 · InternationalDOROT INC — $500 · Human ServicesProject Ezra — $500 · Human ServicesISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $300 · Human ServicesJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyMIDNIGHT RUN INC — $250 · EmploymentALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION — $100 · Health
Other$30,700Education$4,000International$1,700Human Services$1,300Philanthropy$1,000Employment$250Health$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ACADEMY FOR JEWISH RELIGION — $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER COLUMBUS — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLUMBUS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARBURN ACADEMY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSURPRISE LAKE CAMP — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Ezra — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDNIGHT RUN INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sophie and David Rubin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 88%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sophie and David Rubin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sophie and David Rubin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph