Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sonntag Family Foundation (The)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$159k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$44k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$408kPhilanthropy$177kEducation$113kRecreation & Sports$42kFood & Nutrition$41kEnvironment$20kHousing & Shelter$11kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $146k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$44,250
WOMENS BOARD OF BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION$25,000
NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$20,000
SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK$20,000
ARCS FOUNDATION PHOENIX CHAPTER$17,000
JSERRA CATHOLIC SCHOOL$10,000
ST ANNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL$10,000
ROSIE'S HOUSE MUSIC ACADEMY FOR CHILDREN$5,000
ASU FOUNDATION$2,500
ST MARY'S FOOD BANK$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
XAVIER COLLEGE PREPARATORY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$617k · 12 repeat orgs$281k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$617k
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+19%

Still filing today

42%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BN
    BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2024 · $350k · revenue +63%
  • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $53k · revenue +53%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • CG
    CHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +28%
  • University of Arizona Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +19%
  • AF
    ARCS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Arizona Food Bank Network

Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.

Food & Nutrition
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Science Foundation Arizona

Science foundation arizona's mission is to diversify arizona's economy by investing in scientific and engineering research linked to industry needs and investing in education to create a work force with 21st centrury skills.

Philanthropy
6
Waste Not Inc

Waste Not cultivates sustainable food systems that help people and the planet flourish. We do this by eliminating food waste and hunger through innovative community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
7
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
8
Vitalyst Health Foundation

To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals and communities in arizona.

Health
9
St Mary's Medical Center Foundation

St. mary's medical center foundation exists to support the mission of dignity health dba, st. mary's medical center. we do this through our encouragement of charitable giving, our stewardship of donor gifts, and our own grant making, which…

Health
10
Asu Enterprise Partners

See schedule oorganization's missionasu enterprise partners serves as the resource-raising arm of arizona state university. as the parent organization of five nonprofits that are each tasked with identifying new revenue opportunities, asu…

Education
11
Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Foundation

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

Health
12
Northern Arizona University Foundation

Advance the university through fostering relationships, inspiring investment and stewardship.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Rosies House a Music Academy for Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $350,220 · HealthBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATIONARCS FOUNDATION PHOENIX: $57,000 · OtherARCS FOUNDATION PHOENIXWOMENS BOARD OF BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherWOMENS BOARD OF BARROW NEUROLOGICAL …Individual grant recipient: $44,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASU SUN DEVIL CLUB: $31,500 · OtherASU SUN DEVIL CLUBARCS FOUNDATION PHOENIX CHAPTER: $17,000 · OtherARCS FOUNDATION PHOENIX CHAPTERIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherASU SUN DEVIL ATHLETICS: $10,500 · OtherJSERRA CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherST ANNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10,000 · Other+9 more: $35,953 · Other+9 moreCHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INC: $100,000 · EducationCHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA…ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $52,750 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSIT…University of Arizona Foundation: $30,000 · EducationUniversity of Arizona F…ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $21,000 · Food & NutritionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $20,000 · Food & NutritionNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentRosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc: $11,000 · Housing & ShelterST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human Services
Health$350,220Other$288,703Education$182,750Food & Nutrition$41,000Environment$20,000Housing & Shelter$11,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $350,220 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $52,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $21,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc: $11,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAGUNA NIGUEL MILITARY SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation of Arizona: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Rosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAGUNA NIGUEL MILITARY SUPPORT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation of Arizona ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Express FoundationNY15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sonntag Family Foundation (The) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sonntag Family Foundation (The). Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sonntag Family Foundation (The)’s filings →

    More from the funding graph