Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Song Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Philanthropy$1.7MCommunity Improvement$1.3MArts & Culture$1.1MCivil Rights$660kHuman Services$490kCrime & Legal$265kEducation$230kYouth Development$217kOther$0
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $330k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$45,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACLU FUND OF MICHIGAN$250,000
FREEDOM HOUSE$175,000
OUTLIER MEDIA$150,000
AFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL MUSEUM$150,000
MICHIGAN FOUNDERS FUND$150,000
LIGHTSHIP FOUNDATION$150,000
GENESIS HARBOR OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTING$125,000
GHOSTLIGHT ARTS INITIATIVE$125,000
MICHIGAN EDUCATION JUSTICE COALITION$100,000
CENTREPOLIS ACCELERATOR$100,000
LEADERS ADVANCING AND HELPING COMMUNITIES$100,000
YPSILANTI MEALS ON WHEELS$87,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
MOSES$75,000
DETROIT BLACK FARMER LAND FUND$70,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $285k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BASBLUE: $25k → 21%LFE LEADERS INC: $10k → 21%FREEDOM HOUSE: $175k → 21%FORCE DETROIT: $75k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 12 repeat orgs$4.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
22

Total granted

$2.2M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+23%

Still filing today

83%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MICHIGAN FOUNDERS FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $253k · revenue +61%
  • Detroit Justice Center
    2× · 2022–2023 · $250k · revenue +44%
  • PRO PUBLICA INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $200k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • AA
    Ann Arbor Spark Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue -89% · 63% of their budget
  • SD
    SCHWAB DONOR ADVISOR FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $400k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -92%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
2
Community Education Commission

CEC works with diverse stakeholders across Detroit to develop critical resources and system-level solutions that address common challenges faced by Detroit families in accessing quality education.

Education
3
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
4
Connect Detroit

To strategically solve problems through collaboratives with City of Detroit Departments, nonprofit organizations and local grant makers in order to secure the maximum federal, state, and national foundation dollars for the city Detroit.

Community Improvement
5
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
6
Detroit Economic Growth Corporation

Promotion of activities to spur economic growth and revitalization in the city of detroit

—
7
Say Detroit

Providing pathways to success for detroiters in need.

Housing & Shelter
8
Endeavor Detroit

Endeavor Detroit is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in Michigan and the wider Great Lakes region, catalyzing long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in the…

Community Improvement
9
The Youth Connection Inc

The Youth Connection is committed to connecting all youth and their families in metro Detroit to a brighter future by providing quality programs and supportive services.

Youth Development
10
Michigan State Afl-Cio Workforce Development Institute

To apply the principles of workforce development to grow michigan's economy while improving the lives of michigan workers.

Employment
11
Detroit Experience Factory

Detroit Experience Factory is a leading resource for both visitors and locals to discover, experience and learn about the people, places and projects around the city of Detroit.

Community Improvement
12
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Michigan Founders Fund and the most unlike its peers is Moses Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyRacial Equity & Economic Ju…Michigan Environmental Advo…Homeless & Housing ServicesBehavioral Health and Famil…Youth Employment & Developm…Youth Education & MentoringHospital Health SystemsArts & Cultural Organizatio…Business Development Funders
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%21%<5yr15%24%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr17%21%20–35yr12%14%35–55yr13%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%18%<5yr15%15%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr17%45%20–35yr12%9%35–55yr13%7%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 21% of your grantees by number, and just 18% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/47
the rest of the field
17%
3,179/18,867

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
21/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ACLU FUND OF MICHIGAN — $500,000 · OtherACLU FUND OF MICHIGANSCHWAB DONOR ADVISOR FUND — $400,000 · OtherSCHWAB DONOR ADVISOR FUNDWALLACE HOUSE — $200,000 · OtherWALLACE HOUSEUNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY — $200,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTYDETROIT REGIONAL CHAMBER — $180,000 · OtherDETROIT REGIONAL CHAMBERGENESIS HARBOR OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTING — $125,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY INC — $125,000 · OtherGHOSTLIGHT ARTS INITIATIVE — $125,000 · OtherMICHIGAN LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC — $195,000 · OtherMICHIGAN LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC+32 more — $1,060,000 · Other+32 moreAnn Arbor Spark Foundation — $1,020,000 · PhilanthropyAnn Arbor Spark Founda…MICHIGAN FOUNDERS FUND — $253,000 · PhilanthropyMICHIGAN FOUNDERS FUND+2 more — $51,000 · PhilanthropyOUTLIER MEDIA — $300,000 · Arts & CultureOUTLIER MEDIAPRO PUBLICA INC — $200,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA IN…AFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL & HISTORICAL MUSEUM — $150,000 · Arts & CultureAFRICAN AMERIC…LAHC - LEADERS ADVANCING AND HELPING COMMUNITIES — $100,000 · Arts & CultureLAHC - LEADERS…UNIVERSITY MUSICAL SOCIETY — $40,000 · Arts & CultureArtspace Projects Inc — $40,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $18,500 · Arts & CultureDOWNTOWN DETROIT PARTNERSHIP INC — $150,000 · Community ImprovementHillman Accelerator — $150,000 · Community ImprovementGREENLIGHT FUND INC — $50,000 · Community ImprovementDETROIT CHANGE INITIATIVE — $50,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $10,000 · Community ImprovementFREEDOM HOUSE DETROIT — $175,000 · Human ServicesFORCE Detroit Inc — $75,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK — $50,000 · Human ServicesBASBLUE INC — $25,000 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesANN ARBOR DISTRICT LIBRARY — $100,000 · Education482 FORWARD — $50,000 · EducationBLACK MALE EDUCATORS ALLIANCE — $50,000 · EducationWarrior Academy — $30,000 · EducationMoney Matters 4 Youth — $25,000 · EducationINDUSTRIAL SEWING AND INNOVATION CENTER — $15,000 · Education+1 more — $7,000 · EducationDetroit Justice Center — $250,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,110,000Philanthropy$1,324,000Arts & Culture$848,500Community Improvement$410,000Human Services$335,000Education$277,000Crime & Legal$250,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAnn Arbor Spark Foundation — $1,020,000 over 1y, 63% of budgetOUTLIER MEDIA — $300,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetMICHIGAN FOUNDERS FUND — $253,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetDetroit Justice Center — $250,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY — $200,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMICHIGAN LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC — $195,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetDETROIT REGIONAL CHAMBER — $180,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE DETROIT — $175,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL & HISTORICAL MUSEUM — $150,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetDOWNTOWN DETROIT PARTNERSHIP INC — $150,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHillman Accelerator — $150,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY INC — $125,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetANN ARBOR DISTRICT LIBRARY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLAHC - LEADERS ADVANCING AND HELPING COMMUNITIES — $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetYPSILANTI MEALS ON WHEELS — $87,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetFORCE Detroit Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget482 FORWARD — $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGREENLIGHT FUND INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLACK MALE EDUCATORS ALLIANCE — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK — $50,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetDETROIT CHANGE INITIATIVE — $50,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY MUSICAL SOCIETY — $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetArtspace Projects Inc — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTUDENT ADVOCACY CENTER OF MICHIGAN INC — $35,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetWASHTENAW HOUSING ALLIANCE — $35,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetWarrior Academy — $30,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetCOUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS — $26,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBASBLUE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetANN ARBOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER FLINT — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYOUTH ARTS ALLIANCE — $18,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetLive Coal — $15,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetINDUSTRIAL SEWING AND INNOVATION CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAssociation Of Chinese Americans Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLFE LEADERS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY PARK IN THE CITY OF DETROIT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDetroit Jews for Justice — $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetYOUTHTANK INC — $7,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMETROPOLITAN YOUTH SYMPHONY INC — $3,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Dte Energy FoundationUnited Way for Southe…The Skillman Foundati…Ford PhilanthropyMcGregor FundAnn Arbor Area Commun…The Ralph C Wilson Jr…WK Kellogg FoundationHudson-Webber Foundat…James a and Faith Kni…The Martin Family Fou…
Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI45.3× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Dte Energy Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · The Skillman Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · McGregor Fund · Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Hudson-Webber Foundation · James a and Faith Knight Foundation · The Martin Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Song Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines