Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sommers Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$304k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.1MRecreation & Sports$325kInternational$146kYouth Development$109kHuman Services$36kAnimals$31kArts & Culture$24kHealth$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $237k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$18,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP HEBRON FUND$50,000
LOVERI$48,600
GRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH$36,000
FELLOWSHIP DEACONRY MINISTRIES$30,000
CROSS POINT BAPTIST CHURCH$28,000
RIO GRANDE BIBLE MINISTRIES$23,900
STEP OF FAITH MINISTRY$18,000
THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE$15,000
TOGETHER$14,000
SANCTUARY CHURCH$13,050
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$10,000
SUSQUEHANNA CONFERENCE UNITED METHO$7,800
CRU$6,000
ROOTED IN LOVE$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LIFELINE FAMILY CENTER: $12k → 11%LIFELINE FAMILY CENTER: $12k → 11%LIFELINE FAMILY CENTER: $12k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CO
VA
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 27 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
7

Total granted

$1.7M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+26%

Still filing today

26%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    STEP OF FAITH MINISTRY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $146k · revenue +42%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $89k · revenue +18%
  • TT
    THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC
    2× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +408%

Funded once

  • CB
    CELEBRATION BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • TL
    TRUE LIFE CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • BM
    BETHESDA MISSION
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
2
Alongside Education Ministries Inc

Pastor training

—
3
A2 Ministries International Ltd
Religion
4
Gospel Lifeline Ministries

The mission is to train and equip leaders. To help all believers reach their full potential and divine destiny, that they may become all that God has called them to be.

Religion
5
TEN9 Ministries

Proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ worldwide

Religion
6
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
7
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
8
Dozen Ministries

Religious

Religion
9
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
10
Walking On Water Ministries Inc

Teach the word of god

Religion
11
Zoe International Ministries

Bring glory to god through missions

Religion
12
God of Life International Ministry

Spread the gospel through Evangelism. Give 5052 copies of the bible and gospel DVDs CDs and other books during Evangelistic meetings in various countries and around the world and support the Bible Center in Pakistan

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Step of Faith Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMP HEBRON FUND: $325,000 · OtherCAMP HEBRON FUNDCROSS POINT BAPTIST CHURCH: $274,392 · OtherCROSS POINT BAPTIST CHURCHRIO GRANDE BIBLE MINISTRIES: $111,900 · OtherRIO GRANDE BIBLE MINISTRIESDEEP RIVERS CHURCH: $97,420 · OtherDEEP RIVERS CHURCHFELLOWSHIP DEACONRY MINISTRIES: $81,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP DEACONRY MINISTRIESFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TILLMANS CO: $64,000 · OtherPRISON FELLOWSHIP: $55,000 · OtherLOVERI: $48,600 · Other+21 more: $374,030 · Other+21 moreSTEP OF FAITH MINISTRY INC: $146,040 · InternationalSTEP OF F…YOUNG LIFE: $89,050 · Youth DevelopmentASLAN INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC: $65,000 · ReligionPLAYS ON WORD INC: $24,000 · ReligionPartners In Mission: $16,200 · ReligionLIFELINE FAMILY CENTER INC: $36,000 · Human Services
Other$1,431,342International$146,040Youth Development$109,050Religion$105,200Human Services$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEP OF FAITH MINISTRY INC: $146,040 over 8y, 18% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $89,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC: $65,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetLIFELINE FAMILY CENTER INC: $36,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPLAYS ON WORD INC: $24,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetASLAN INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetPartners In Mission: $16,200 over 3y, 95% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEP OF FAITH MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PLAYS ON WORD INC ↗
  • Who funds ASLAN INC ↗
  • Who funds Partners In Mission ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sommers Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sommers Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Lifeline Family Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sommers Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph