Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sommers Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$304k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$1.1MRecreation & Sports$325kInternational$146kYouth Development$109kHuman Services$36kAnimals$31kArts & Culture$24kHealth$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $237k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$18,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP HEBRON FUND$50,000
LOVERI$48,600
GRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH$36,000
FELLOWSHIP DEACONRY MINISTRIES$30,000
CROSS POINT BAPTIST CHURCH$28,000
RIO GRANDE BIBLE MINISTRIES$23,900
STEP OF FAITH MINISTRY$18,000
THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE$15,000
TOGETHER$14,000
SANCTUARY CHURCH$13,050
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$10,000
SUSQUEHANNA CONFERENCE UNITED METHO$7,800
CRU$6,000
ROOTED IN LOVE$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LIFELINE FAMILY CENTER: $12k → 11%LIFELINE FAMILY CENTER: $12k → 11%LIFELINE FAMILY CENTER: $12k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CO
VA
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 27 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
7

Total granted

$1.7M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+26%

Still filing today

26%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    STEP OF FAITH MINISTRY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $146k · revenue +42%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $89k · revenue +18%
  • TT
    THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC
    2× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +408%

Funded once

  • CB
    CELEBRATION BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • TL
    TRUE LIFE CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • BM
    BETHESDA MISSION
    one grant, 2024 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
2
Alongside Education Ministries Inc

Pastor training

3
A2 Ministries International Ltd
Religion
4
Gospel Lifeline Ministries

The mission is to train and equip leaders. To help all believers reach their full potential and divine destiny, that they may become all that God has called them to be.

Religion
5
TEN9 Ministries

Proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ worldwide

Religion
6
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
7
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
8
Dozen Ministries

Religious

Religion
9
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
10
Walking On Water Ministries Inc

Teach the word of god

Religion
11
Zoe International Ministries

Bring glory to god through missions

Religion
12
God of Life International Ministry

Spread the gospel through Evangelism. Give 5052 copies of the bible and gospel DVDs CDs and other books during Evangelistic meetings in various countries and around the world and support the Bible Center in Pakistan

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Step of Faith Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAMP HEBRON FUND — $325,000 · OtherCAMP HEBRON FUNDCROSS POINT BAPTIST CHURCH — $274,392 · OtherCROSS POINT BAPTIST CHURCHRIO GRANDE BIBLE MINISTRIES — $111,900 · OtherRIO GRANDE BIBLE MINISTRIESDEEP RIVERS CHURCH — $97,420 · OtherDEEP RIVERS CHURCHFELLOWSHIP DEACONRY MINISTRIES — $81,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP DEACONRY MINISTRIESFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TILLMANS CO — $64,000 · OtherPRISON FELLOWSHIP — $55,000 · OtherLOVERI — $48,600 · Other+21 more — $374,030 · Other+21 moreSTEP OF FAITH MINISTRY INC — $146,040 · InternationalSTEP OF F…YOUNG LIFE — $89,050 · Youth DevelopmentASLAN INC — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC — $65,000 · ReligionPLAYS ON WORD INC — $24,000 · ReligionPartners In Mission — $16,200 · ReligionLIFELINE FAMILY CENTER INC — $36,000 · Human Services
Other$1,431,342International$146,040Youth Development$109,050Religion$105,200Human Services$36,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTEP OF FAITH MINISTRY INC — $146,040 over 8y, 18% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $89,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC — $65,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetLIFELINE FAMILY CENTER INC — $36,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPLAYS ON WORD INC — $24,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetASLAN INC — $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetPartners In Mission — $16,200 over 3y, 95% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEP OF FAITH MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC
  • Who funds LIFELINE FAMILY CENTER INC
  • Who funds PLAYS ON WORD INC
  • Who funds ASLAN INC
  • Who funds Partners In Mission
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sommers Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Lifeline Family Center Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph