Skip to content
Solomon Center Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Solomon Center Inc

To provide grants to organizations and needy individuals, and to promote jewish awareness and practice.

$514k
Granted FY2022
11
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$108k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Religion$597kEducation$551kInternational$44kHealth$40kPhilanthropy$10kHuman Services$8kOther$0
02FY2022 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $322,119, the rows itemized in this filing. The $514,150 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $192,031 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $124k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $178k
$18,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$307k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED LUBAVITCHER YESHIVOTH$108,000
EZRAT ISRAEL INC$70,019
CHESED CENTER$39,600
CHABAD OF MONTVILLE$24,000
Individual grant recipient$22,100
CHABAD LUBAVITCH HOSPITALITY$18,000
CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS VYOM T$10,000
FRIENDS OF CHABAD TZFAT$10,000
CHABAD OF TYSONS CORNER$9,000
YESHIVA GEDOLA ROCKLAND$6,000
YTTMTL INC$5,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON VKALA: $8k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 7 repeat orgs$236k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$1.0M
$139k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+79%

Still filing today

43%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
ReligionInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UL
    UNITED LUBAVITCHER YESHIVOTH INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $531k
  • AC
    AHAVAS CHESED - LOVE OF KINDNESS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $160k · revenue -56%
  • CC
    COLEL CHABAD
    4× · 2017–2021 · $147k

Funded once

  • CL
    CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTHWEST BROWARD INC
    one grant, 2021 · $54k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $36k
  • KS
    Keren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED LUBAVITCHER YESHIVOTH INC: $530,580 · OtherUNITED LUBAVITCHER YESHIVOTH INCCOLEL CHABAD: $147,390 · OtherCOLEL CHABADEZRAT ISRAEL INC: $100,019 · OtherEZRAT ISRAEL INCCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTHWEST BROWARD INC: $54,000 · OtherNATIONAL CHESED CENTER: $39,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $36,000 · OtherCHABAD OF NOTHWEST NEW JERSEY MONTVILLE TOWNSHIP INC: $34,530 · Other+8 more: $70,577 · Other+8 moreAHAVAS CHESED - LOVE OF KINDNESS INC: $159,537 · ReligionAHAVAS CHESED …JEM FOUNDATION INC: $7,450 · ReligionChabad Lubavitch Hospitality Center Eshel Hachnosas Orchim: $43,500 · InternationalFriends of Chabad Tzfas Inc: $10,000 · InternationalYTTMTL INC: $20,521 · PhilanthropyCROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyKeren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah: $7,900 · Human Services
Other$1,012,696Religion$166,987International$53,500Philanthropy$30,521Human Services$7,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAHAVAS CHESED - LOVE OF KINDNESS INC: $159,537 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetChabad Lubavitch Hospitality Center Eshel Hachnosas Orchim: $43,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetYTTMTL INC: $20,521 over 3y, 13% of budgetCROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKeren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah: $7,900 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJEM FOUNDATION INC: $7,450 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AHAVAS CHESED - LOVE OF KINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Chabad Lubavitch Hospitality Center Eshel Hachnosas Orchim ↗
  • Who funds YTTMTL INC ↗
  • Who funds CROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Chabad Tzfas Inc ↗
  • Who funds Keren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah ↗
  • Who funds JEM FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Communal FundNash Charity Foundati…The Rapoport Family F…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Committee fo…The Rav-Noy Family Fo…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ojc FundNY20× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · The Rapoport Family Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Committee for Furtherance of Jewish Education and Affilliates · The Rav-Noy Family Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Solomon Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Solomon Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Solomon Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home